Good idea. Its above your reading comprehension anyway...You just posted a link to a website you created...I’ll pass.
Good idea. Its above your reading comprehension anyway...You just posted a link to a website you created...I’ll pass.
I think you're the guy postulating that Petrino would work in a job he hated...I didn’t suggest what he should do. I’m just calling out this theory that you are trying to casually pass off as fact. Your hatred of Tyra has led you down this rabbit hole of developing inane theories.
Easy to check one year's line item against the last, once the financial reports are published. You in??How are you going to verify something that hasn’t happened yet?
Uuuhh...ok. See you in 2020Easy to check one year's line item against the last, once the financial reports are published. You in??
I think you're the guy postulating that Petrino would work in a job he hated...
That's exactly what you did...I don’t claim to get inside the brain of Petrino like you are...
Relate? Lol - you’ve just described yourself to a tea.Out of touch, in his own world, looking for validation. IOW someone I can relate to...
That's exactly what you did...
We'll have a pretty good snapshot of actuals by the 1st quarter of FY2020 (9-30-2019). The ULAA will cover their quarterly financials in October. And by mid-June, we'll know what "Vince" is budgeting for 2020.Uuuhh...ok. See you in 2020
The only pattern is you believing hypotheticals and what you wanna believe...No. You are creating a false narrative once again. I see a pattern with your work here.
I don't go up and introduce myself to people...Relate? Lol - you’ve just described yourself to a tea.
“‘Zipp’ is starting to get upset!”
Your lack of self esteem most likely prevents that. It’s clear that you feel most comfortable in this type of anonymous setting leading to 40K message board posts.I don't go up and introduce myself to people...
And introduces himself to this guy.Your lack of self esteem most likely prevents that. It’s clear that you feel most comfortable in this type of anonymous setting leading to 40K message board posts.
Maybe give hypnosis a shot.
The only pattern is you believing hypotheticals and what you wanna believe...
Good idea. Its above your reading comprehension anyway...
Not even remotely.You surely realize that the lower I go, the lower hi-guess-who-I-am goes?
I raised the possibility; some people do that so they can brag about beating target when the only reason they did that was the target was too low. Attendance is largely influenced by opponent, weather, and winning. We have an excellent home schedule and Vince NQ can’t budget for weather. I expect a more competitive product by default- we could not get worse. It is fair to expect improved attendance. How much is anyone’s guess. The Mack parallel is really not relevant.We'll have a pretty good snapshot of actuals by the 1st quarter of FY2020 (9-30-2019). The ULAA will cover their quarterly financials in October. And by mid-June, we'll know what "Vince" is budgeting for 2020.
That budget will tell me 95% of what I need to know. But like last year, you'll be reminding me that "Vince" could be sandbagging. That's a guy who's draining his bank accounts, but he's sandbagging how well he'll be doing financially. The Nile River...
No, I rebutted your hypothetical. And I challenged you to find factual evidence supporting your hypothetical, which you couldn't do--as usual...This is hilarious. You posted the hypothetical and offered it as fact.
And how much was the lawsuit over, and how much of tangible value did I end up with? All of those are pertinent facts I'll be more than happy to educate you about.Nah, I already know the ending of that story, repaying money, loss of parking spaces, multi year bans of serving on boards. No reason to read you blabbering on and on about it blurting out incoherent sentence fragments. I get more than I want of that here.
So let's change the narrative again. Got it...Not even remotely.
SURELY YOU REALIZE that with your crusade like vendettas and homemade T-shirts, you have become a cultural oddity for many people who frequent this board.
It’s analogous to the natural curiosity that makes motorists drive slowly by the scene of an accident so they can get a closer look.
Then, you surely have no problem betting me that direct football revenue will increase this year. And that's to begin offsetting the ridiculous $14 million that "Vince" so casually threw away to immediately root out another Jurich holdover. Right?...I raised the possibility; some people do that so they can brag about beating target when the only reason they did that was the target was too low. Attendance is largely influenced by opponent, weather, and winning. We have an excellent home schedule and Vince NQ can’t budget for weather. I expect a more competitive product by default- we could not get worse. It is fair to expect improved attendance. How much is anyone’s guess. The Mack parallel is really not relevant.
No, I rebutted your hypothetical. And I challenged you to find factual evidence supporting your hypothetical, which you couldn't do--as usual...
You said Petrino would work in a job he hated. That's the definition of a hypothetical...Maybe you are struggling to keep up, but I didn’t posit a hypothetical. You created the thread and are spitting theories that seem to have no rational basis.
And how much was the lawsuit over, and how much of tangible value did I end up with? All of those are pertinent facts I'll be more than happy to educate you about.
And best to go to the OT forum since you've brought garbage that's WAAAAAAY off topic. Good try...
Great question...wish the idiot was still around that offered that huge buyout on a coach with a checkered past.I'll guaran-damn-tee you that football ticket revenue is down next year, and down by several million. I'm just trying to figure out when we're gonna get payback on that $14 million investment.
Fortunately, you know I'll keep tracking that. It's what I do...
You said Petrino would work in a job he hated. That's the definition of a hypothetical...
It’s only 7 mill this year, 7 next, I believe. Again, it wasn’t about removing a Jurich holdover. If Bobby goes 8-4 and goes bowling, he’s still the coach. In fact, if he goes 2-10 and is competitive in at least some of those losses, he is probably still the coach. It had nothing to do with Jurich. It was about his absolutely awful job performance. We could not afford to destroy the program.Then, you surely have no problem betting me that direct football revenue will increase this year. And that's to begin offsetting the ridiculous $14 million that "Vince" so casually threw away to immediately root out another Jurich holdover. Right?...
What does my personal history have to do with this topic?“...you’ve brought garbage that’s WAAAAAAY off topic.”
This is your classic move in every single thread.
Petrino's buyout was comparable to Mack's and LESS than Brohm's. Satterfield has also a three-year salary buyout coming from FCS football...Great question...wish the idiot was still around that offered that huge buyout on a coach with a checkered past.
I said Petrino wouldn't work in a job he hated, and no coach does, the latter being a fact. You said I don't know that factually, meaning you questioned that he would. That's a hypothetical.Quit making stuff up. I never said that. This thread is you making up unsupported hypotheticals.
So you're arguing hypotheticals too, a consistent trait among clown apologists evidently? How do we collect on our $14 million then? Is it hypothetically we would have lost it? Let me know which bank accepts hypothetical deposits, and I'll start to believe.It’s only 7 mill this year, 7 next, I believe. Again, it wasn’t about removing a Jurich holdover. If Bobby goes 8-4 and goes bowling, he’s still the coach. In fact, if he goes 2-10 and is competitive in at least some of those losses, he is probably still the coach. It had nothing to do with Jurich. It was about his absolutely awful job performance. We could not afford to destroy the program.
The problem with attendance is that there is no control experiment. We don’t know what attendance would have been with Bobby and his staff still in place. We can only speculate, but the trend was not promising. The real test is what attendance will be vs what it would have been.
As regards a wager, I doubt I could collect my winnings.
I said Petrino wouldn't work in a job he hated, and no coach does, the latter being a fact. You said I don't know that factually, meaning you questioned that he would. That's a hypothetical.
You're arguing hypotheticals as I said. Your AD made it a hypothetical by pi$$ing away $14 million...
LOL... "I wanna believe."What you said is not a fact. I asked you to provide proof (perhaps a quote from Petrino) that would support your opinion. I want to believe what you say but you offer no proof.
What does my personal history have to do with this topic?
Clown answer: _________________________________
Nonsensical response.So let's change the narrative again. Got it...
LOL... "I wanna believe."
You wanna believe in the illogical, that a person wants to work in a job he hates. AGAIN, find me one high profile football coach doing that--should be easy if you're right...
App State is FBS, and has been for several years now.Petrino's buyout was comparable to Mack's and LESS than Brohm's. Satterfield has also a three-year salary buyout coming from FCS football...