A program Turning Point
- By CardHack
- Forum: Louisville Football
- 15 Replies
I think there were multiple areas that we saw as strengths defensively Saturday night vs. the three losses, not the least of which is:Not arguing with any of the OP points, or those additional comments. As for me, we performed defensively so much better against Clemson, largely a result of not having to contend with a multi-faceted QB like what we faced against GT, BC, SMU, ND and of course Miami.
English acknowledged that he simplified our defensive schemes, something that was necessary; however in fairness to English it was a much easier task against Clemson when the QB play was primarily confined to passing and handing-off to RBs. Chasing an athletic QB can not only be exhaustive, it can reduce any defensive strategy to limited success.
1. Health of the secondary, especially cornerback. We didn't have Riley against ND and SMU. Thornton was playing with an oven mitt and forced into playing with it due to another injury (can't remember if it was Holloway). Miami went at him all day because the best he was going to do was club the ball. We had an outstanding night in coverage and that over the top, Two Deep umbrella was a big help.
2. Health on the defensive line and the emergence of the transfers Thor Griffith and Guerrad. Guerrad wasn't fully healthy until the game in Charlottesville. We missed Tramel Logan for a period after getting hurt against SMU and he really hasn't been back fully since; ditto Konga who looked like our best DT early in the year. It is VERY clear that we sure could have used a healthy Mason Reiger.
...the pass rushing lanes against Klubnik were perfectly coordinated all night and rather than arcing the defensive end pass rushes it was tight and narrow keeping Klubnik boxed in. While he isn't anything like Stephens or Cam Ward getting out the pocket, he does have escapability that creates big plays downfield when things break down and he killed NC State with it.