One incredible BB game. Your guys represented well. Don't be a stranger.
When you post, it's hard for me not to imagine that you're not Charlie Brown's school teacher.... I keep reading wahwahwahwahwah!!!!
I agree that the refereeing was not up to the calibre of the two teams on the floor, but I felt Jenkins got hosed on the 1st PF and most definitely on his 4th.
Zipp and rocky,And you know that how??
Well then,there are probably very few "honorable" programs at all.If you think about how many programs have gotten away with the slightest of infractions and knowingly,it's still cheating.Just because you get away with it,don't make you honorable.
That's right. There was one program not long ago that had never ever had any type of major infraction. It was considered THE model program for all of collegiate sports. That program was
I agree. It could have happened at any university, and any university could have covered it up while pretending to be the poster child program of integrity.
You forgot Andre.Then, welcome to the club of the dishonorable.
"Elite program", my a$$...
The university as a collective entity, no, but certain individuals involved with the university, yes. Which on certain fronts is related to our case. In UNC's case there was a concerted attempt to "assist" those who needed academic assistance. However, that got exploited further into making sure certain athletes were "eligible to participate in college athletics".
That ain't the point... When you live in a glass house, you're an idiot throwing stones. I made this point a year ago to Carolina bashers in our fanbase and before this McGee/Powell issue.
Zippisms at its best!! The first paragraph Zipp links the Carolina situation with ours and the the 2nd paragraph he scolds me for pointing out similarities and differences. Thanks for the chuckle...
If I understand your point, let's not blame the NCAA or the system for us sitting home while UNC nearly wins another championship. We gave ourselves a postseason ban, no one else did. Carolina is letting the process play out. And time will tell whether those were the right decisions by each school.
I am actually pleased that we have an AD who wanted to get out in front of this instead of waiting, and waiting, and waiting for an outcome that could end up being devastating to the program. He's being proactive to a fault according to some. UNC took a different path and it might pay off for them. It probably will. Being a brand new member to the big boy table, I don't think we had much choice but to be proactive.
Then, welcome to the club of the dishonorable.
"Elite program", my a$$...
Cue, the only issue with your POV is I'm not at all sure that Jurich was behind the ban. I'm 100% a Jurich supporter, and if I truly thought that this was his invention, I'd agree with you. But if you believe what people were saying on February 5th--and not Pitino a day later--this was Doc's decision. Supposedly, Jurich was part of the investigation and like Pitino not privy to what Ramsey and Smrt were. Only when the lynch mob was forming did this become Jurich's decision. And if you try to read people at that presser, Jurich who's the one guy we want to hear from the most, said the least.
I'm sorry but you are just nieve to think that Ramsay acted alone and then again on these sanctions. He's in so much hot water and scrutiny he would be dumb to take more action. Also Smrt is a paid consultant, he's not a U of L employee, he's not making the decision when the only person who should be is the AD. I think Tom is just fulfilling his obligations by not being able to say anything because he does not want to jeopardize the University.
Then, why did Ramsey say "I" and "my" a half dozen times during the presser and in his letter to boosters and alumni? Flies in the face of what you're saying.
