ADVERTISEMENT

Cards Back In the Top 25

Pretty simple to me, really. Latest bracketology, which is based purely on metrics without any bias (or at least as little bias as is humanly possible), has us as an 8 seed. That’s a ranking of anywhere from 29 to 32. Sounds like the AP poll having us at 30 has it about right.

After 12-52 the last two years, with more than half of those 52 not even being competitive, the name “Louisville” doesn’t give ANY poll voters a reason to rank us highly based on reputation. Call that bias if you want. We’ve got to earn all of that back, one game at a time.

The exciting news for all of us is that we’re on a 7 game winning streak currently, so we’re very much trending in the right direction, and we should begin to be ranked very soon, as long as we keep winning.
  • Love
Reactions: SoulSr

Cards Back In the Top 25

Hell, you just provided reasons why voters shouldn't rank us higher. We had Pryor when we beat IU and West Virginia and almost beat Oklahoma. He's not coming back this year so how do you convince someone that you are actually better without him? By the way, I don't believe its true, I am only left wondering how good this team could really be but I'm not going to piss and moan about it. Just going to sit back and enjoy what we have!
Because we have improved and won despite the injuries. You just don't seem to grasp the point. Each week the voters SHOULD vote for the teams for what they' have accomplished up to that week.

It's not about convincing we're better without the injuries, it's we're still good enough to win despite them and that deserves a ranking. That's it. The weekly rankings are like grades. How can you deny the Cards deserve a higher grade when they have won 7 consecutive games against the better teams in the conference?

It's common sense.

Cards Back In the Top 25

That is the current process and some are already there like Bilas and Packer, but for the most part, most pundits are just not convinced or they're reluctant to admit Louisville basketball is back.

Now I believe the current bias is due to the scandals, but UofL has always had its detractors with the pundits. The last season before covid shut down the season, Louisville reached #1 in the polls.

It was just the 2nd time in poll history that Louisville reached the top spot during the regular season. Despite all the wins, the final 4's, the three titles, and with two Hall of Fame coaches, voters were reluctant to vote the Cards #1.

Now I'm sure there's those who will give reasoning for this and I do remember when it was discussed more by Cards fans who believed there was a bias. Some even didn't mind because they liked being overlooked. Made the winning better.

For me however it was BS as programs like Memphis and Cincinnati both have been ranked #1 several times, and then there were the many times Louisville was under seeded in the big dance. I recall fans complaining about Louisville's seed in 2005 and 2014 especially.

I suppose these memories are why the current disregard bugs me so. I've been following Louisville sports for several decades now and I do realize many younger fans don't share my pessimism on this regard. So yes, keep winning and force the voters hand.

It's a Louisville basketball tradition after all.

Cards Back In the Top 25

Has Gonzaga lost two of its best players and gotten better?

Once again it shouldn't make any difference where teams were perceived in the pre-season when voting for the top 25 in mid January. If you were a voter for the AP, would you have Louisville in the top 25 today?

That's it. It's that simple. These excuses given for not voting for Louisville despite the Cards accomplishments are lame. In the coaches poll, the Cards got 3 votes.

That is bias, plain and simple.
Hell, you just provided reasons why voters shouldn't rank us higher. We had Pryor when we beat IU and West Virginia and almost beat Oklahoma. He's not coming back this year so how do you convince someone that you are actually better without him? By the way, I don't believe its true, I am only left wondering how good this team could really be but I'm not going to piss and moan about it. Just going to sit back and enjoy what we have!

Some Top NIL Programs Struggling

If money ever truly became important --- which many believe is true today --- bet against Arkansas at your own risk.

Luckily for us, it takes a helluva lot more than money to be successful.
Like any business if money isn’t spent wisely, your misevaluate talent and management sucks it won’t be successful. The reverse is true as well.

Take the Oakland A’s Moneyball. They did more with less. However eventually the entire league started using their model. The Red Sox took it to another level.

Let’s stick with Arkansas. Football they clearly aren’t pumping huge dollars into football. They are letting Pittman hang around. If they were really serious he would have been fired. Basketball, a billionaire buys a coach\friend. The game evolved the coach he bought hasn’t. His offense is archaic. The way he handles his rosters is weird and ineffective.

The SEC is struggling in football because they are seeing too much churn in their rosters. Bech left UGA let that sink in. No way that happens 3 years ago. The exact opposite happened in basketball. Their roster churn isn’t that bad and they can easily replace what they lost.

Money and leadership matter, they both have to be there to be successful. You can’t only moneyball or out spend people to win championships. Zipp is right money matters but you don’t have to over pay to find a great leaders or players. You just have enough money to obtain or retain your best talent.

Syracuse at Louisville

In one stretch, the ladies went 7 minutes without scoring, and that occurred here at home. The good news however, there were periods where our Cards kept Syracuse from scoring at the same time ….. this team can use its athleticism to execute some pretty good defense at times. I went back thinking I would see some horrible shooting percentage, but at 44%, that is not horrible. We out-rebounded the Cuse, and that was the difference.

Unrelated, Oklahoma’s Payton Velhurst scored 38 points; sorry but that sort of explosive offensive addition back at UL would make this team a huge ACC threat.

Syracuse at Louisville

Well, she's here to play basketball and Coach Walz is depending on her when he puts her in. I know she's trying but she looks like she's unsure of herself.

Are the two other freshmen "bigs" redshirting?

Unless the NCAA changes the rule for basketball, the only redshirt Hardy and Imfadon could get is a medical redshirt. Both of them are currently under the 30% threshold (9 games) for a medical redshirt, with Hardy having played 8 and Imfadon 6.

Without a medical reason, you cannot play any games during the season and earn a redshirt year in basketball - though it’s been proposed to implement a 33% (10 games) or less limit, similar to football.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT