nccardfan said:

Lunardi has us as a #7 seed and while I think we are more deserving as a 5 or 6 seed, I don't understand how Clemson is a #4 seed.

Click to expand...

Bias! Plain and simple. Louisville has one loss in 2025, beat Clemson by ten points and led most of the game against Duke.

They have dominated the ACC like a high seeded team does in a weak conference, yet unlike Duke and Clemson, that weak conference is a reason to doubt Louisville's results.

It's an absolute joke to have Louisville a #7 seed and Joe Lunardi needs to retire or be replaced by someone who obviously doesn't have a bias against certain teams.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

It's just remarkable how he can recite such dominant stats and numbers against a weak ACC conference, but doesn't give Louisville the same props against the same ACC teams.

It's not like Louisville's been squeaking by with their wins. The Cards have five 20 point + wins on the road. Why exactly is Louisville fake and Duke not?

Clemson beat Duke and Louisville beat Clemson. Other than Clemson, Louisville gave Duke It's toughest game in the ACC and that was the first conference game.

No, the only reason for Duke fans to think this way is because of how bad Louisville was the past two seasons. They simply cannot accept such a huge turn around can be legitimate. It has to be fake.

I bet Coach Schyer himself admits Kelsey should be the ACC COY. No one on the planet foresaw Louisville winning 25 games. If it wasn't due to coaching then what is it?

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

You can't tague that strike 3 w/ the bases loaded, Tague.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Louisvillian said:

I see the logic but I think with the ACC being down a 5 seed would still be fair at this point but a 7 seed? That’s ridiculous.

Then again, anyone remember in 2005 at this exact time of year we were 29-4 and ranked #6 in both polls and were given a 4 seed by the committee?

That team got a huge chip on their shoulder that fueled a Final Four run.

Click to expand...

I think we’ll likely be a 5 or the top 6 seed as long as we win our first game.

I always had the hot take that many of our own fans got way too into the 2014 team hype, declaring they were better than 2013. We played really well and the analytics loved the team, but we didn’t have many good wins. Retroactively we talk about beating UCONN because of how they did in March, but they were only a 7 seed. I wasn’t as high on that team as many, mainly due to the AAC not being as strong.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Dook isn’t taking the news so well. They are acting like entitled Ky fans that have a MUCH better dental plan…

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

2330859 said:

That #13 in both polls should qualify for consideration as a #4 seed in NCAA tournament if it were based on today.

Click to expand...

I see the logic but I think with the ACC being down a 5 seed would still be fair at this point but a 7 seed? That’s ridiculous.

Then again, anyone remember in 2005 at this exact time of year we were 29-4 and ranked #6 in both polls and were given a 4 seed by the committee?

That team got a huge chip on their shoulder that fueled a Final Four run.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

nccardfan said:

Lunardi has us as a #7 seed and while I think we are more deserving as a 5 or 6 seed, I don't understand how Clemson is a #4 seed.

Click to expand...

Clemson has wins over Duke and Kentucky that boosts them a bit higher.

I don’t think there’s much separation in the 3-7 seed lines. Big wins like that seem to be the separation.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

BREAKING: St. X linebacker Karsten Busch (@k_busch15), a top-300 prospect

???????

A 3 star is now top 300?

I don’t put much stock in “stars”, and this just confirms it.

I’d say the kid is sound and can be a player from his background.

No pressure when they play for Cal.

He’s not won it all but once in their lifetime. So if they win the NC, great. If they don’t? So what? Nobody else did either.

They get to pimp themselves, and make a ton of money, with zero pressure.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.