All right Cardinal fans
- By glassmanJ
- Forum: Louisville Men’s Basketball
- 5 Replies
and Festivus for the rest of us! Happy Holidays!
I agree about 95%. I want to get rid of any vestige of opinions and use objective criteria. I think the system at lower levels still uses a dumb committee. I’ve always believed in tie-breakers. If you have truly objective criteria, TV gets what it gets and no conference has an advantage it hasn’t earned on the field.The biggest problem is the rankings and spreads have a heavy reliance on perceived talent. That is how power rankings are determined. It is a really good indicator for odds makers and gamblers. However week to week there are upsets. Alabama losses to Vandy they don’t drop because Alabama is still very talented. Name any non brand team that isn’t as talented losses they rocket out of the rankings. They aren’t talented. Any loss can be explained away. They are still talented.
It is a very good indicator on who will ultimately play in the title game. However it isn’t perfect, you wouldn’t have Ole Miss losing to UK and Florida.
I been saying it for years it is a rigged system. Teams with higher ranked players will always be ranked higher. Then when those teams get beat by a Vandy or UK then those teams get bumped up. There is a reason they have never had a playoff.
They need to go to a NFL model. All the Power 4 teams get AQ.
AFC North-Big Ten
AFC South-SEC
NFC East-ACC
NFC West-Big 12
The AQ spots are determined by a tie breaking system. Use the ranking system that is used at the lower levels to seed the field. It is too easy. It gets complicated because of the SEC, Big Ten and TV. They have to have more representation.
God's blessing to all.
Merry Christmas.
Hopes for a season of peace, joy and happiness!
OSU 33- Oregon 31What no TB score?
We all accept that there's human beings that are picking these playoff teams. They have a stated criteria and it's not going to be perfect.I not 100% sure Louisville beats IU and if Louisville lost to IU not sure that helps IU.
The reason they were in the playoffs is because lost 1 game in a Power 4 conference. Do we really want to keep teams out of the playoff that has 1 loss over a 3 loss team? Any Louisville fan that raises their hand is crazy. Louisville was 1 year away from getting left out with 2 losses because of their perceived SOS.
They want to make this a TV show that is completely scripted. It is sports shit happens and that is why we love it. If Vandy beating Alabama doesn’t matter then let’s just let the most 5-8 most talented teams play in the playoff.
I acknowledged the Universities sports success, it's only the lack of the main prize that I'm lamenting. Now if I wanted to start a thread about how successful at sports the University of Louisville has had with several different programs, I would have had a post like yours.Hmmm... and yet only 8 schools have won more than 3 NC's in basketball. It just seems like everyone but U of L is winning championships. While playing in the Big East Conference from 2005 through 2013, the Cardinals captured 17 regular season Big East titles and 33 Big East Tournament titles totaling 50 Big East Championships across all sports. In 2016, Lamar Jackson won the school its first Heisman Trophy.
Since 2000 Louisville is the only NCAA team to win a BCS bowl game; to appear in the NCAA Division I men's basketball Final Four, the College World Series, and the NCAA Division I women's basketball Final Four; and to finish as runner-up in the Men's soccer College Cup. It is one of only six schools that has appeared more than once in each of the following events—a BCS bowl game, the men's and women's basketball Final Fours, and the College World Series—and Louisville's span of seven school years (2006–07 to 2012–13) is the shortest among other schools.
Also, it is the first school ever to win a BCS bowl game, appear in the men's and women's basketball Final Fours, and appear in the College World Series in the same school year, doing so in 2012–13.
I'm sure other schools would be glad to have the success we have had...