TouchéI always hate seeing posts like this because you know what, the next time it’s our players…
Lovie Jenkins, Shoni Schimmel…
Well it sounds as though the witness may have changed his statement could be out of fear or he didn’t give the correct facts up front. But that’s entirely different than what he told Crawford and Blankenbaker. Also if they had a gun that wasn’t registered it wouldn’t be hard to give it to someone to keep. So no gun no problem for Tinsdale. None of this shocks me. The delay by law enforcement allowed for evidence to fade away. And it’s very simple to say there were no guns found at the scene. Who knows if they even checked, the whole thing seems fishy. There is a vast difference in how issues are handled in Lexington and Louisville.UK released a 4 page transcript yesterday from the Disciplianry Board:
Two persons that were football players had been invited by someone to this party.
The person that stated he saw a firearm told the board
He saw a gun in the waistband of a person he could not identify.
After saying he could not identify the person named Vito Tisdale as the person with the gun.
The person being interviewed state Tisdale flourished the gun "so I heard" stating he had not seen the act.
The person then stated there were 4 guns.
Lexington police found no guns at the scene, and executed a search warrant on the properties of Tisdale and found no gun.
Based on the account given by the complaining party (this witness) the disciplinary board found insufficient evidence to proceed.
Now, what happens, I've no clue. The statement released by the disciplinary board from early June is certainly different in ways than what was reported to Eric Crawford. Could be many reasons for this.
The GRAND Jury supposedly meets next week.
If the prosecutor feels the Commonwealth has sufficient evidence, they convince the jury and proceed.
If not, then the prosecutor has the option to drop charges or request a different Grand Jury while more evidence is collected.
Is there any link to this 4 page transcript?UK released a 4 page transcript yesterday from the Disciplianry Board:
Two persons that were football players had been invited by someone to this party.
The person that stated he saw a firearm told the board
He saw a gun in the waistband of a person he could not identify.
After saying he could not identify the person named Vito Tisdale as the person with the gun.
The person being interviewed state Tisdale flourished the gun "so I heard" stating he had not seen the act.
The person then stated there were 4 guns.
Lexington police found no guns at the scene, and executed a search warrant on the properties of Tisdale and found no gun.
Based on the account given by the complaining party (this witness) the disciplinary board found insufficient evidence to proceed.
Now, what happens, I've no clue. The statement released by the disciplinary board from early June is certainly different in ways than what was reported to Eric Crawford. Could be many reasons for this.
The GRAND Jury supposedly meets next week.
If the prosecutor feels the Commonwealth has sufficient evidence, they convince the jury and proceed.
If not, then the prosecutor has the option to drop charges or request a different Grand Jury while more evidence is collected.
The frat boys are going to spin it an extreme way towards their side.Well it sounds as though the witness may have changed his statement could be out of fear or he didn’t give the correct facts up front. But that’s entirely different than what he told Crawford and Blankenbaker. Also if they had a gun that wasn’t registered it wouldn’t be hard to give it to someone to keep. So no gun no problem for Tinsdale. None of this shocks me. The delay by law enforcement allowed for evidence to fade away. And it’s very simple to say there were no guns found at the scene. Who knows if they even checked, the whole thing seems fishy. There is a vast difference in how issues are handled in Lexington and Louisville.
Raise your hand if your shocked at the findings? No hands, not surprised. No wonder Stoops was so positive. If the FB players did all of what their accused of I wouldn’t want interact with them in the future. They have been empowered to do whatever they want and they’ll be protected. I go back to, why would UK students make up stuff that would hurt their FB team. I just don’t buy that this was fabricated. Sorry
I will see if I can find it.Is there any link to this 4 page transcript?
Try to find the gun while you're at itI will see if I can find it.
I needed that laugh out loud moment today. Thanks! I'm still chuckling.Try to find the gun while you're at it
I like Bill he knows that but 😂I needed that laugh out loud moment today. Thanks! I'm still chuckling.