After going through a full season, Kentucky has played only 4 rpi top 50 games, only A&M from the SEC is top 50. They shouldn't call it P5 in basketball, unless #5 is the Big East.
SEC
- Thread starter rockycard
- Start date
- Status
It's true the SEC hasn't been great the past few years, fortunately it hasn't hurt UK's performance in the NCAA tournament.
And I wasn't aware of UK's number of top 50 RPI teams, (thanks for looking that up). Do you know UK's record vs. those top 50 teams?
And I wasn't aware of UK's number of top 50 RPI teams, (thanks for looking that up). Do you know UK's record vs. those top 50 teams?
Last edited:
And if you're trying to make me look obsessive, I'm not on my rivals board like some people.
Thanks. The two loses were overtime loses and true road games (KU and A&M), and the two wins were ACC teams, (UL and Duke).
Last edited:
Not at all, I just like to stop by once a week or so and read the UK/SEC threads here.
Last edited:
I was just responding to your post. And I acknowledge the SEC isn't a strong conference.
Last edited:
I just like trolling the trolls. And if you want to read this later, copy and paste now, because steelers deletes my posts every chance he gets.
Yes but recall what you rubes say about the SEC in football when we beat SEC teams (not counting the Yutcats). It's easy to get up for one game when the rest of your schedule is full of mid majors. The ACC is a grind. You'd have finished around 5 or 6 in our league. See works both ways
I have no issues with Steelers deleting posts as long as he consistently enforces the rules fairly.
You guys only have a few Superbowls each year, congrats on your two point home court win.
UK is actually going to play a ranked conference foe for the first time this season and it comes in the last game LOL. That is sad
In the last 10 years the ACC has 4 teams that have made a FF, Big East 3, Big 12 2, Big 10 5, Pac10 1, etc. SEC has 3. There's not a difference really in tournament performance as it relates to conference difficulty. Why it matters what the rest of your conference does, makes no sense. If you're good and make a run in the tourney, you do it whether or not your conference affiliates are good or not.
And if you want to say it helps out a teams' seeding well UK made it to the championship as a 7 seed two years ago.
And if you want to say it helps out a teams' seeding well UK made it to the championship as a 7 seed two years ago.
What teams and where were they played? The SEC is barely going to get 3 teams into the tournament, equivalent to the AAC.
UK isn't responsible for the rest of the conference and how it performs...just like UL isn't responsible for Wake, Syracuse, BC or UVA in football...
We went 2-0 against the best the ACC had to offer this year...went 3-0 against ACC last year...
I'm not sure what the point is...there could be a super conference of championship programs and I'll bet dollars to donuts that UK comes out on top or darn near it more often than not...
We went 2-0 against the best the ACC had to offer this year...went 3-0 against ACC last year...
I'm not sure what the point is...there could be a super conference of championship programs and I'll bet dollars to donuts that UK comes out on top or darn near it more often than not...
Last edited:
That's such a cool story. Go and tell Matty Bangs about it
well at least you responded and didn't delete my post all together...more than i can say for some...
as for "Matty Bangs"...if he was whining about the SEC i would tell him...but he's not...
long story short...you play your schedule and your conference opponents...it's not up to you how good they are throughout the season...
Feel better? It's not Louisville, I don't care. Thanks for yet another uk thread. You make UofL fans look psycho. Good going.
Hold up. When did Uk play North Carolina and Virginia this season? You know the two teams that finished #1 and #2 in the ACC this year thus being the "best the ACC had to offer?". Let's not let those pesky things called facts get in your way. UofL and Duke finished #4 and #5 in the ACC. I do appreciate the compliment toward UofL though.
Did you give UofL the same benefit of the doubt when we played in C-USA or the Big East in football? I think not, however, we still beat your SEC butt.
You play your schedule and your conference opponents year after year after year and you become the program with the most wins,its much easier to make the NCAA Tournament especially when the field was much smaller.Of course your going to have more conference championships in the sez and of course the more wins the better seed although this year the sez champion is only a 4 seed.Could you have racked up all that in another conference? Of course not! Being in the sec is the reason cayut fans have such a false sense of being above every other team.You would have to be stupid to think you could do that in any of the other conference.Basketball has ALWAYS been a joke in the sec.Truth is Louisville has been more impressive than uofk for a while now.In the Big East 16 teams and 15 of them had been to a final 4 with S.Florida being the only member to not make one.The Cards were at the top of that conf.every year except for maybe the first year 05.Winning 2 conf.championships.
IN the ACC 11 of the 15 members have been to a final 4.
IN the SEZ only 4 or 5 out of 14 teams have been to a final 4 so when you talk about the winningest team in college basketball its nothing to brag about when you realize how you got there!
- Status
Similar threads
