Sorry, my BS meter was in overload with this...
Murray was on the mid season list of 25 prospects, but he was not on the late season list of 20. Please note, Academics are not reviewed until the finalist are revealed, hence why Simmons was not eligible but was on the list of 20. (For the record, the lists are not final locks either, as players not on the list of 20 could still become a finalist.) Ultimately, here is no hint of substance to Murray not being eligible, he just was not a finalist. He was one of the 25 best (according to the Wooden people) but not one of the finalist... no big deal there. All it means is they felt there were worthier candidates (which I think everyone would agree with).
If you think Murray was not eligible, please substantiate that claim. UK has had a perfect APR for the past 3 years. I know it's not a great measure, but the only one publicly available. Since GPAs and grades are private, good luck proving your claim... and yes, you make the claim, the burden lies with you.