ADVERTISEMENT

A program Turning Point

I used to say that Louisville became a modern football program Breeder's Cup Day 2000 when they beat Southern Miss in Hattiesburg, MS against a team that was #13. Much like Clemson they spent their games against us with combinations of heartbreak and curb stomping--Mills Kills, Favre with his Hail Mary in 1989 and really little else but blowouts in between. Only an Ice Bowl win in Cardinal Stadium in 1980 to show for ourselves. Saturday night was for us like the lifting of the Curse of the Bambino or the Curse of the Billy Goat. Clemson was the last Dragon that we had to slay in the ACC and to do it at Clemson--and at night--put that to the sword:

1. The only other parallel I will draw to that game was the blocking scheme was virtually identical to Art Valero's cutblocking masterpiece which constructed in part because USM had a nasty defensive line and we had a very small wide receiving unit with Zek Parker, Deion Branch and Arnold Jackson. It was to get the ball to them unimpeded as quickly as Ragone could get it out. It serves to get the hands down of the defensive line and Clemson clearly wasn't prepared for it and really, why would they be? We hadn't shown that all year but I am going to tip my hat a little to Jeff Brohm...he was bird dogging on the Offensive line status. That is the same five man starting unit we had in BC with Mills going to RT and Brown at RG over Collins. Austin Collins did play against Clemson. I don't think Mendoza did and Sylvester had some quality blocks in tandem with Gonzalez on the left side. Nygra landed a killer block to spring Brown for his dagger.

Second straight game without a sack. Some fantastic downfield blocking whether legal or not (the issue was Ahmari Huggins block on Duke Watson's screen--already fifteen yards downfield). For offensive line sickos I'm sure like Dave Scull a Renoir on display down in Death Valley.

2. It was subtle probably to people who haven't watched Louisville passingly, but the offensive tempo was different. Frankly it's the tempo I thought we'd see from Clemson who baffled everybody with a Monday Morning QB jersey on--and the ESPN crew Wischusen and Lewis Riddick--with the complete lack of urgency to the final whistle. Heck they ran out the clock in the first half down ten knowing Louisville was getting the ball back to start the 2nd half in a preview of coming attractions. Did their scouting report say "Slow the tempo down in the complete opposite way SMU and Miami sped it up"...yeah, that level of genius really caught us.

3. A complete, all systems football game. If it weren't for Deangelo Hutchinson's unnecessary block in the back we'd have added a punt return for a score by Brooks to the Tab of Decimation that was the special teams difference. Kudos to Travelsted for shaking off his first quarter miss and maintaining momentum with his conversions. Kudos to the kick coverage unit who I'm reasonably certain didn't allow a return to the 20.

4. Tackling was substantially better. Coverage from all phases--clearly on point. You don't get 9 PBUs without preparation, anticipation and great closeouts. It seemed like Clemson was in 3rd and 2 twenty times Saturday night, and a subsequent 4th and 1 7 or 8 (they were 5/6 on 4th down, but that one missed conversion was the one that sent them to the exits). When they did convert 3rd and 2 it seemed like Mafah met a wall at the sticks and barely converted.

...and I wanted to single something else out; not only was tackling better, in some cases it was punishing. There was a tackle Clark had on Wesco on a short conversion that I was surprised he stayed on the field and I think he did in part due to thinning numbers from their WR unit. The hit on Mafah on 4th and 1 had MJ and Ramon Puryear meeting him a yard deep in the backfield high and low and Thor leaked through his gap late (as did Gillotte). There aren't many things I love more than a 4th down or a Goal Line Stand where it's just hat-on-hat and you have somebody beating a gap. It was perfect.

5. And I don't want to lose sight of something else. While Isaac Brown is just flatout different, I don't lose any confidence when Duke Watson is in the game. Two freshmen, two very different running styles but both are punishing in their own way despite neither being 190. Pump some Duke Watson on that slip screen into my veins all day.
Have to say one thing: As the 4th Qtr was running down, I posted to my text group that finally we have killed the vampire.
  • Like
Reactions: Mayoman

LOUISVILLE VS MOREHEAD STATE GAME THREAD- 7PM ACCNX

Against good defensive teams with size we may struggle to get good 3 point shots. This team will go as far as its defense takes it and that may be deep into post season play.
They'll get the looks from outstanding ball movement more so than sets. It's a higher IQ of basketball than we've seen in a minute.
They just need to stay patient against bigger and better teams and not fall into the trap of thinking every shot is a good one.
  • Like
Reactions: shadow force

LOUISVILLE VS MOREHEAD STATE GAME THREAD- 7PM ACCNX

We have a lot of shooters but I don't think anyone is an elite shooter. Smith may be but he takes some very questionable shots.

No Ryan McMahon or Taquan Dean or DeJuan Wheat.

Against good defensive teams with size we may struggle to get good 3 point shots. This team will go as far as its defense takes it and that may be deep into post season play.
Let me fill you in on a new philosophy. Take open shots if you got them. Its not a coincidence that we only had 5 turnovers. I heard Kelsey say the more passing around you have on a possession trying to find a better shot is what leads to a either bad pass or turnover. If you got an open shot, trust that you can make it but if you don't either fight like hell to get the rebound or get back on defense.

A program Turning Point

I'm not reading too much into one game when it's the best we've played this year...
I see it a little differently. I see a team that is growing up,growing together since game one. Trying to work in new faces from the portal and youngsters sometimes takes a minute. I agree about coaching teams up for these huge games,historically he's been good at. In the new age of continuous personnel turnover,it's more about getting them to buy in and execute as a group.

Sometimes that takes a few games,losses that easily could've gone our way(and there are a myriad of reasons for the losses).

What I saw Saturday is things finally coming together to overcome adversity. We won't know until the next one if it holds,but I doubt future opponents are looking forward to seeing these Cards.
  • Like
Reactions: Mayoman

Who foresees a Indiana vs Louisville bowl matchup?

Currently, Oregon is the top seed and they would play either OSU, IU or Penn State.

If IU beats OSU, the Buckeyes are out and Penn State would need IU to lose to face the Ducks.

For IU to play for the Big 10 championship with one loss they would need upset losses by the others.
I forgot about Oregon being in the Midwest lol
  • Haha
Reactions: TPACardsFan

Who foresees a Indiana vs Louisville bowl matchup?

Looking at the remaining games, here's what's likely to happen.

Oregon defeats Maryland, Wisconsin and Washington. They're the top seed in the Big 10.

OSU defeats Purdue, Northwestern, IU and Michigan. They would be the 2nd seed and play Oregon for the championship.

Penn State defeats Washington, Purdue, Minnesota and Maryland but would be behind OSU due to their loss to OSU.

Indiana defeats Michigan and Purdue but loses to OSU, eliminating them from the championship game.

So basically, IU has to be undefeated to play in the title game, unless of course there's some upsets that would definitely clutter things a bit. However, just don't see any upsets possible except maybe Minnesota beating Penn State.

I just don't see IU making the title game if they lose to OSU.
  • Like
Reactions: Mayoman
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT