ADVERTISEMENT

Nate Ament update

Sorry, but how would these folks know “who leads who” in this culture? Duke is now, as they have always been, the one school that ends up with whoever they want the most.

CPK and UL deserve so much credit to even be in this conversation given where we were with just one season removed from the Payne era.
Where is Clark Francis from the Hoop Scoop when we need him most?

Nate Ament update

Agree. What's $87k in this dynamic? It's basically like here's a free pizza for coming. LOL. Elite players get $1m+.
Its a website put together by duke grads where normal fans like me and you can donate directly to “nate ament come to louisville” as opposed to fans donating their money to NIL collectives where they have no choice in where the $$$ goes.

But ur right that fanstake stuff wont be a 1/20th of what he really gets from whatever collective

Nate Ament update

Not saying we don’t lead, but the 87,000 on Fanstake is not gonna be why we get him if we do. Definitely doesn’t hurt us but it won’t be the deciding factor. There’s a lot more to it as far as NIL packages go. Also, thought he already visited Arkansas this weekend?
Right! Thats wont be a drop on the bucket to what he ends up getting from whichever collective.
  • Like
Reactions: Hugh Tripley-Bohner

Nate Ament update

Because I read it Ament still has a trip to make to Arkansas and Calipari. He is considered a generational player so he is shopping for best offers and the article said he would announce his decision at the McDonalds All American game April 1st.
No offense, but if Ament was some kind of cooper flagg/john wall/AD level of generational recruit, why is he ranked 4th in the class? The other 3 all Michael jordan?

Im not saying hes no good, but he aint KD or cooper flagg or anthony davis either. If he was hed be ranked as number 1 recruit, not 4th.

OK, it’s time to call out this staff

Appreciate your experience and perspective Stealthy, but I am not sure how close you have been watching UL baseball, and particularly CDM and Roger Williams with respect to managing our pitching performance during the games over the last several seasons?

With all due respect, you are wrong about “saving the rotation”. Look at the number of pitchers that we have on this roster, and remember Dan’s preseason comments about “the quality of depth that we have”.

Little League, HS, College and MLB managers/coaches are expected to recognize when the pitcher has lost control, and as a rule they know it’s time to make the change before disaster hits. When a Coach or a Manager fail to make the change, the consequences affect the pitcher, the team and the fans ……. Dan not only did Forbes no favors, he allowed him to contribute to the disastrous 6th inning after a brilliant 5 innings of work. I believe that further explains the “team meetings”.

These last two games resulted in our pitchers giving up 24 runs to California; now you can either concede the rotation is simply not ready for ACC level baseball, or question our coaching staff as to whether they have an abundance of confidence in one or two pitchers, or very little confidence in the rest of the rotation. Ten runs should be enough to win an ACC game.
I disagree. This is not how you manage a pitching staff. Ask anyone who has ever competed at a high level. Not a single person would have pulled Forbes right away. Number of pitchers on the roster and actual talent do not equate. That's a casual way to view the game. I do agree in that the pitching has given up far too many runs, but again, there is a talent discrepancy not an issue of in-game management. I feel your frustration, but that's not how you manage a baseball game.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT