Cards v. PITT
- By PushupMan
- Forum: Louisville Women’s Athletics
- 15 Replies
Offensive explosion! We were 3-21 from 3pt at one point, now 7-27 and lead by 10 (51-41).
Those former Cards were before the portal. Good chance several of them may have transferred if there was a portal then.Many times post players need more time. Everyone coming in can’t make an instant All-Acc impact. Maybe we need to let them get to their Jr seasons before giving up on them. When did Engstler really blossom? How about C Walton? Shook took a while to really contribute as well. You just can’t go into the portal and pluck top-teir post players. They really cost - how much are contributing to the WBB NIL tund? Not really wanting an answer - point is, even the WBM market is expensive. Guarantee uk’s height cost a pretty penny. UofL doesn’t have the $$ to spend on a top-3 post player.
I’m really old. When I was a kid the Big 8 was the top conference, and the $EC was considered “soft”. Any time Nebraska, Oklahoma, Mizzou or anybody else would face an $EC team in a bowl or in regular season they would just crush them. My how things have changed.You can kind of tell a person's age by when they grew up watching football.
If you started getting heavy into College Football around the Petrino era and after, especially the Charlie era, then you remember SEC SEC SEC winning all the time. But if you started before that, you remember the Big Ten bias. People don't remember 2004 Auburn being undefeated out of the SEC and not making the BCS title game. People forget the time when OHio State, Michigan, and Notre Dame had all the bias. Nebraska was a powerhouse. Florida State and Miami was the biggest game of the year and the modern ACC was build on that game. The SEC star was Steve Spurrier. Then the USC, OU, and Texas years of the early 2000s.
The SEC never really had that one program that was a major draw. Like you know what I mean, a program that when they're rocking everyone is paying attention. Programs like Ohio State, USC, Texas, Michigan, & Notre Dame. The SEC programs like Georgia, Alabama, Florida, and Tennessee are all really good. The draw is that there are a bunch of really good programs and talent that makes it interesting. The league itself was the sell. Nick Saban making Bama that team every single year helped them keep that brand dominance during the years were they weren't as strong.
Remember the 2006-2007 coaching cycles? Rich Rod turned down Alabama but took Michigan. Les Miles had a national title team at LSU, but was heavily considering leaving for Michigan. Crazy to think that in this day and age, but that mindset changed ever so quickly
Right before Florida won the 2006 title, Ohio State and Michigan both played at #1 and #2. It was the defacto national title game and the clear best two teams. Florida beat OSU down in the title game. I mean the I remember the Iron Bowl just being another rivalry game and not a must watch game before Saban.
A lot of memories in there. And I can add a few more.I was in school when Ok-Neb and Ok-Tx was must see FB. (1970’s)
OU claimed the 73 title and won it in 74 and 75. This was when the had players like Billy Sims and the Selman brothers.
Nebraska was ALWAYS in the hunt from 1970-2001 winning the NC in 70, 71, 94, 95 and 97
Texas had their name in the hat most years making the above list games “must see”.
I remember watching USC and John McKay “integrate” the sec in 1970, helping it become what it is today.
A lot of change and ups and downs for a lot of teams over the years. The sec hasn’t always been top dog. Up until the early 2000’s, when bowl games really meant something to players, the sec only had a 54% winning percentage. Hardly dominating. (In fairness the acc was 48%)
But through it all, over all these years, the one constant, the one never changing fact of football, the one thing you could count on, regardless what conference was “tops”
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
uk has sucked 98% of the time. 👍🤷🏻♂️🏈
turns out maybe Coach knows how to recruit players for his system. kinda feels like this is not coincidence. that maybe he sees these kids as slightly polished but still a little rough gems that with some soothing and shaping turns them all into diamonds. versatile, defense first type of guys who are now given free reign to shoot and score, but only when you're the open guy. now they are all learning to trust each other instead of one guy having to do it every night. it's getting exciting and while we're gonna hit a bump or two, i think top four acc is realisticI was going to say in the last three games alone.
While it's a different hero every night, I swear Chucky Hepburn might be the single most critical part to our success as a team since Dejuan Wheat's senior year. He didn't score last night, but he still gave Clemson fits at both ends of the court.
I am kind of with Cycle on this one. Not sure when all this talk about conferences began, maybe when the SEC teams started dominating the college football championship or when the discussion began about having a college football playoff, but I have always had favorite "teams" and not favorite "conferences." Outside of Louisville, my favorite team growing up was the Sooners and I hated Nebraska and Texas. Billy Sims, Marcus Dupree, Greg Pruitt, Selmon brothers, the Boz.... I dislike Duke and North Carolina as much as I do Ohio St and Michigan. Out of the Big 10, I liked Purdue, mostly because of basketball. While I dislike Alabama, Florida and LSU, I like watching Georgia. I liked UCLA over USC. And as Cycle pointed out, other conferences don't really mean anything to me if Louisville doesn't win its own conference. If U of L is not playing for an ACC championship, bowl game or NC, I couldn't really less what conference wins. Sure I have my preferences.My point as a UK or Louisville fan who cares if the SEC/ACC has had more championships. I don’t care how strong the ACC is or isn’t my only concern is can Louisville win the ACC. The SEC has historically sucked in basketball does that diminish what UK have done in basketball? No, they had great teams when they won it all.
The conference talk is only used to prop up or tear down a team. The only reason you care is because you need to try explain why UK is good or bad. The truth is you don’t need it to prove either. They suck in football and are a blue blood in basketball.
Texas depends how you define dominate but I agree there are too many elite programs with NIL capital for any team to dominate like Alabama and Georgia have done the last 10 years. However they will be at the top of the league from now on.