ADVERTISEMENT

National Semifinal Picks

Since Mayo didn't do a Pic'em this week. I decided to see if I could make it so we could post our takes. No winners, no losers and most certainly no trophy! Post if you want, ignore if you want.

Penn State over Notre Dame 24-21. My original pick b4 the CFP began was Notre Dame, but wrestled mightily with this one in the last few days.

Ohio State over Texas 35-24. I picked the Buckeyes b4 the CFP started and see no reason to change now.
  • Wow
Reactions: Mayoman

Louisville vs Wake Forest

Many times post players need more time. Everyone coming in can’t make an instant All-Acc impact. Maybe we need to let them get to their Jr seasons before giving up on them. When did Engstler really blossom? How about C Walton? Shook took a while to really contribute as well. You just can’t go into the portal and pluck top-teir post players. They really cost - how much are contributing to the WBB NIL tund? Not really wanting an answer - point is, even the WBM market is expensive. Guarantee uk’s height cost a pretty penny. UofL doesn’t have the $$ to spend on a top-3 post player.
Those former Cards were before the portal. Good chance several of them may have transferred if there was a portal then.

They may stay on but if Walz signs better front court players, they will be gone which is what I suspect will happen. If not, then next season will look much like this season and I think Walz knows it.

Welcome .....the new SEC west

You can kind of tell a person's age by when they grew up watching football.

If you started getting heavy into College Football around the Petrino era and after, especially the Charlie era, then you remember SEC SEC SEC winning all the time. But if you started before that, you remember the Big Ten bias. People don't remember 2004 Auburn being undefeated out of the SEC and not making the BCS title game. People forget the time when OHio State, Michigan, and Notre Dame had all the bias. Nebraska was a powerhouse. Florida State and Miami was the biggest game of the year and the modern ACC was build on that game. The SEC star was Steve Spurrier. Then the USC, OU, and Texas years of the early 2000s.

The SEC never really had that one program that was a major draw. Like you know what I mean, a program that when they're rocking everyone is paying attention. Programs like Ohio State, USC, Texas, Michigan, & Notre Dame. The SEC programs like Georgia, Alabama, Florida, and Tennessee are all really good. The draw is that there are a bunch of really good programs and talent that makes it interesting. The league itself was the sell. Nick Saban making Bama that team every single year helped them keep that brand dominance during the years were they weren't as strong.

Remember the 2006-2007 coaching cycles? Rich Rod turned down Alabama but took Michigan. Les Miles had a national title team at LSU, but was heavily considering leaving for Michigan. Crazy to think that in this day and age, but that mindset changed ever so quickly

Right before Florida won the 2006 title, Ohio State and Michigan both played at #1 and #2. It was the defacto national title game and the clear best two teams. Florida beat OSU down in the title game. I mean the I remember the Iron Bowl just being another rivalry game and not a must watch game before Saban.
I’m really old. When I was a kid the Big 8 was the top conference, and the $EC was considered “soft”. Any time Nebraska, Oklahoma, Mizzou or anybody else would face an $EC team in a bowl or in regular season they would just crush them. My how things have changed.
  • Like
Reactions: Rollem Cards

Welcome .....the new SEC west

I was in school when Ok-Neb and Ok-Tx was must see FB. (1970’s)

OU claimed the 73 title and won it in 74 and 75. This was when the had players like Billy Sims and the Selman brothers.

Nebraska was ALWAYS in the hunt from 1970-2001 winning the NC in 70, 71, 94, 95 and 97

Texas had their name in the hat most years making the above list games “must see”.

I remember watching USC and John McKay “integrate” the sec in 1970, helping it become what it is today.

A lot of change and ups and downs for a lot of teams over the years. The sec hasn’t always been top dog. Up until the early 2000’s, when bowl games really meant something to players, the sec only had a 54% winning percentage. Hardly dominating. (In fairness the acc was 48%)

But through it all, over all these years, the one constant, the one never changing fact of football, the one thing you could count on, regardless what conference was “tops”
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

uk has sucked 98% of the time. 👍🤷🏻‍♂️🏈
A lot of memories in there. And I can add a few more.

First off, I would like to address national media bias (or laziness). Many fans worry about who is ranked where in the pre-season polls. They are totally meaningless and largely consist of the same 5or 6 teams ranked in the top ten every year - Ohio State, Notre Dame, Michigan, Texas, USC and the most recent flavor of the day - regardless of losses to graduation or up and coming teams in their respective conferences. They were familiar names and those polled took the easy way out. I can't tell you how many times I've seen Michigan being a pre-season Top 10 team, only to struggle to be ranked by years' end.

Switzer's OU teams of the 70's were something to see. If you could. His best teams were when they were on probation and not on TV. Texas was a big deal until he turned the Wishbone loose on them. They had no answer for Joe Washington, Greg Pruiit, Billy Sims and the like.

The Thanksgiving Day game vs. Nebraska in 1970 or 71 remains one of the best games that I have ever seen. Period.

I remember Bear Bryant inviting John McKay and the Trojans to an early season game knowing full well the outcome in advance. Sam Cunningham and crew did the same thing to Bama that they had done to OSU in the previous year's Rose Bowl. That game did more to integrate the SEC than any other reason. The Bear now had cover to recruit black athletes, though it would be a few years b4 he could recruit a black QB.

The college scoreboard show had a distinct East Coast bias. Ivy League, ND, Syracuse and the Big Ten dominated the coverage. You had to break out the AM radio and tune into Tele-Score 84 to get info on SEC or Big 8 games. Is Sid Jenkins still around?

Somehow, I think this bias morphed its way into the SEC! SEC! SEC! chant. The national perception was they were hayseed states that still practiced Jim Crow. So what if they play good football? I think it played a part in both polls not awarding top ranking to an undefeated Bama team in 1966, despite Notre Dame having a tie with MSU on their record. There was no way the pollsters were going to give Bama the NC three years in a row with George Wallace standing in the schoolhouse door.

Someone mentioned their weariness over Michigan/OSU in the Big Ten. When you grow up in Northern KY and work in the state of Ohio, you get tired of hearing the media and co-workers run down your hayseed state. So much so that you look to their biggest nemesis. It helped immensely when Michigan hired the coach from my short-lived college day! Bye, bye State, I'm now a Michigan fan now. And have been except for the RichRod era. Go Blue!

My experience with UK football began in 1965 or so when they beat top-ranked Ole Miss. They followed it up the next week by beating the new #1 Auburn. It's been downhill ever since! The Curci years were interesting, but they went on probation for those excesses. I finally gave up on them when they hired Claiborne i/o The Pipe. They now head up the Enemies List. Go Cards!

A bit of a ramble, but please indulge an old man.

Different Guys Stepping Up

I was going to say in the last three games alone.

While it's a different hero every night, I swear Chucky Hepburn might be the single most critical part to our success as a team since Dejuan Wheat's senior year. He didn't score last night, but he still gave Clemson fits at both ends of the court.
turns out maybe Coach knows how to recruit players for his system. kinda feels like this is not coincidence. that maybe he sees these kids as slightly polished but still a little rough gems that with some soothing and shaping turns them all into diamonds. versatile, defense first type of guys who are now given free reign to shoot and score, but only when you're the open guy. now they are all learning to trust each other instead of one guy having to do it every night. it's getting exciting and while we're gonna hit a bump or two, i think top four acc is realistic

Welcome .....the new SEC west

I am kind of with Cycle on this one.
My point as a UK or Louisville fan who cares if the SEC/ACC has had more championships. I don’t care how strong the ACC is or isn’t my only concern is can Louisville win the ACC. The SEC has historically sucked in basketball does that diminish what UK have done in basketball? No, they had great teams when they won it all.

The conference talk is only used to prop up or tear down a team. The only reason you care is because you need to try explain why UK is good or bad. The truth is you don’t need it to prove either. They suck in football and are a blue blood in basketball.

Texas depends how you define dominate but I agree there are too many elite programs with NIL capital for any team to dominate like Alabama and Georgia have done the last 10 years. However they will be at the top of the league from now on.
I am kind of with Cycle on this one. Not sure when all this talk about conferences began, maybe when the SEC teams started dominating the college football championship or when the discussion began about having a college football playoff, but I have always had favorite "teams" and not favorite "conferences." Outside of Louisville, my favorite team growing up was the Sooners and I hated Nebraska and Texas. Billy Sims, Marcus Dupree, Greg Pruitt, Selmon brothers, the Boz.... I dislike Duke and North Carolina as much as I do Ohio St and Michigan. Out of the Big 10, I liked Purdue, mostly because of basketball. While I dislike Alabama, Florida and LSU, I like watching Georgia. I liked UCLA over USC. And as Cycle pointed out, other conferences don't really mean anything to me if Louisville doesn't win its own conference. If U of L is not playing for an ACC championship, bowl game or NC, I couldn't really less what conference wins. Sure I have my preferences.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT