That's rationalizing data points, I'd argue, just to fit a "Vince" narrative. Maybe you don't understand data analysis. They are what they are. They're not ALL outliers.
You bring up Jurich's arrival...same circumstances. He was dealing with a group of coaches that he didn't hire or knew. Some were performing well and others poorly. What were his metrics the first few years? He replaced six coaches in six years. "Vince" has replaced that many in his FIRST year.
And Jurich inherited coaches that Bill Olsen hired. All Olsen cared about was banking money from basketball, which he did admirably. No one questions that. But he didn't set up his successor with great coaches.
The other element that undermines data rationalization was a key concern many had about "Vince" in this role...retaining our portfolio of coaches. That was, in fact, theorized as an eventual problem. And what's happened? He's losing them.