What sanctions have Creighton and Kansas endured prior to what's pending?
12-1 was their preseason odds as of 11-25-2020, That was six games and less than one month ago.LPT is not listed at 12-1. They are now 25-1.
I just quoted you a pretty obvious, nearby example of how wrong Vegas can be looking out a half dozen games or so. Instead of hurling insults, bring more conclusive evidence to make your case otherwise...You are being a goof-ball. This was the final odds before the season was called. To say that the 7th lowest odds wasn’t a strong Final Four contender is just stupid.
But all the good coaches don't inherit scandals and have NCAA decisions looming in their 3rd year...
My comparison was WRT to your "looming" observation.What sanctions have Creighton and Kansas endured prior to what's pending?
Plenty of bad ish going on elsewhere, some worse than ours. The DIFFERENCE is no one else laid waste to their basketball program to achieve whatever ends the current regime is shooting for.There are arent any comparable examples to this mess.
Hookers + FBI is just not an everybody else did is doing it way of operating.
As far as actual sanctions, they're irrelevant if it hasn't affected your current roster of players and coaches.
You're still not on the topic of the thread. And you need to start another thread if you wanna change it...I wasn’t happy about the loss to UK in ‘86. But if you remember we won a national title that year. Check out the dates on the banners at YUM Center. So, I kinda got over it. Some folks don’t seem to be able to let things go and move on.
Plenty of bad ish going on elsewhere, some worse than ours.
Sorry I don't give anyone much sympathy for self-inflicted injuries. Nor evidently do a lot of other fans I see and talk to...
I'm not wrong about that analysis. You lose a good player, you bring in another.Wrong, actual sanctions cost the program players - like Ramey @ Texas for example.
I don't follow recruiting as close as others but I'm sure there are countless other high profile guys that removed UofL from their list due to these off-court problems that you *shrug* about.
The current roster of players wouldn't be if not for sanctions LOL!!!!!!!!!
How about schools where there's hard evidence that current coaches are (or were) violating rules? Why doesn't that affect them now like you claim we're being affected?Baylor covered up a murder about 20 years ago I guess.
Please list all the programs in bed with hookers and the FBI in a short window that's the analysis we need here.
You continue to short change what's happened here it's just mind numbing LOL!
My anecdotal evidence was the cherry on top, and it's still evidence. It just doesn't jive with your way of looking at the world. Not my fault...I know a guy that knows a guy - analysis!
How about schools where there's hard evidence that current coaches are (or were) violating rules? Why doesn't that affect them now like you claim we're being affected?
Because your premise is flawed...
I just quoted you a pretty obvious, nearby example of how wrong Vegas can be looking out a half dozen games or so. Instead of hurling insults, bring more conclusive evidence to make your case otherwise...
12-1 was their preseason odds as of 11-25-2020, That was six games and less than one month ago.
I just quoted you a pretty obvious, nearby example of how wrong Vegas can be looking out a half dozen games or so. Instead of hurling insults, bring more conclusive evidence to make your case otherwise...
My understanding of events is that UofL went on the road to play the at full strength 12th ranked team in the country with 8 scholarship players - and among those missing were 2 of their best 3 players. Wisconsin can shoot the 3 from all 5 spots, got hot and we got blown out. Is that somehow different than your understanding?I used broad strokes. You didn’t like them because they don’t square with your understanding of events.
I would say I played sports at a higher level than most on this board, but only played high school basketball (played in KY Sweet 16). Of course, that doesn’t matter with respect to this conversation.
Our guys should not have lost the game by 40. You can make a valid case for losing or even losing soundly, but to go up there and give minimal effort is unacceptable. I promise you Bellarmine would have kept it within 20 or so and they would love to have our athletes. We took a historic beat down and it can’t be blamed on the things people are assigning blame to.
If 9 days of missed practice makes 8 of our scholarship, D1, ACC level athletes lose by 40, you better hope I’m right.
My understanding of events is that UofL went on the road to play the at full strength 12th ranked team in the country with 8 scholarship players - and among those missing were 2 of their best 3 players. Wisconsin can shoot the 3 from all 5 spots, got hot and we got blown out. Is that somehow different than your understanding?
The whole notion of margin - it somehow would have been “better” getting beat by 20 - is silly. Regardless of how it makes you feel - it counts as one loss. I’ll reserve judgment on the team when we see how they perform at something resembling full strength. If at that point they are continuing to be non-competitive - I’ll agree there’s a problem.
And I can assure you that if bellarmine would have shown up with the same set of circumstances as did UofL - they would have been beaten by 80.
I can assure you that in the same way that you could promise me that they would have kept it at 20. I agree that it wasn’t a good look for UofL for a number of different reasons - I’m just not going place more importance on it than it deserves at this point in time.So you can assure me that ?(acting like you voice). I will see how it plays out too, but if playing at Wisconsin was a big enough deal to reschedule it, I’m surprised and unimpressed we would show up looking disorganized and uninterested. The big white kid isn’t Louisville material. Sure the board will have a field day with that, but he sucks. When was the last time we lost by 40? Not sure I have seen it and I was born in 1981 and started following closely in 1993
I said nothing about such a "plan". I said there's an effort to short sell this team, downplay its shortcomings, and accept results that were previously unacceptable. You tell me if that fits into your plan...No, I understand the thread completely. I just disagree there is some sinister plan to destroy U of L athletics from within because we lost a game in December.
I agree we lost big time. Don’t believe it is part of a higher plan regardless of what a small circle of lunatics are trying to sell.
You're simply asking for an exact analog to what happened here as if the lack of it supports your premise. It doesn't.List your examples of coaches in year 3ish that inherited programs that got sanctioned for hookers and have sanctions pending for the FBI.
You're just citing a few predictions that don't square with a team playing its worst basketball at the end of the year. So what?The team was still getting a 2 seed per final bracket drop. 21% of Final Four teams come from the 2 line in the history of the tournament since they started seeding in 1979.
Obviously, the 2nd most popular seed to reach the Final Four.
NCAA Final Four Appearances by Seed
www.printyourbrackets.com
You can't have it both ways--although I'm sure you'll try... The same preseason odds that placed LPT at 12-1 have Nova, the Zags, and Baylor at the top. Six weeks in, that's where those teams are.I wouldn’t call what I said an insult. You are being intellectually dishonest and you know it. You and I both know using Uk’s preseason odds to somehow discredit real time odds that took into account 30+ games is patently ridiculous. You are better than that.
You're simply asking for an exact analog to what happened here as if the lack of it supports your premise. It doesn't.
You're just citing a few predictions that don't square with a team playing its worst basketball at the end of the year. So what?
And if you were so damn good to close out last year, WTH happened to your expectations this year?...
Facts are usually good enough for me. And we have FACTS showing U of L was playing its worst basketball of the season when last year ended. (Just like the year before I might add...)...We can’t make a conclusive statement about something that unfortunately didn’t have a result. However to argue that UofL wasn’t a strong final four contender when Vegas had them pegged at #7 is absurd...
So your stat showing 21% of teams advancing to the Final Four from a 2-seed is indicative of a "strong contender,' to use Knuckles' term? That's a reach when there's a 79% chance you don't. Hell, you have a chance of getting there just being in the tourney.I didn't cite predictions, I cited RESULTS since 1979.
Roster turnover. You return 1 guy that played over 10 min per from the prior team. The replacements are FR/SO, 5th YR SR, and some hurt guys... It is really weird you're asking WTH happened to expectations.
Your responses make you look highly uninformed about the NCAA Tourney history and the UofL program. If you can't comprehend massive roster overhaul from one year to the next, I have no idea why you are posting on a college basketball forum. Why didn't the team after Pitino's first Final Four make the NCAAs the next year??? Roster turnover my lord!
Facts are usually good enough for me. And we have FACTS showing U of L was playing its worst basketball of the season when last year ended. (Just like the year before I might add...)
If we were 30-0 when that run of games started, maybe its "worst" would have been good enough. But we were not 30-0...
So your stat showing 21% of teams advancing to the Final Four from a 2-seed is indicative of a "strong contender,' to use Knuckles' term? That's a reach when there's a 79% chance you don't. Hell, you have a chance of getting there just being in the tourney.
And before the 2012 NCAA tourney, how contented and philosophical were the fans? That's my point...Didn’t the 2012 final four team lose by 31 to an awful 15-17 Providence team that year? Also UofL lost 4 of their last 6 regular season games that year, not to mention 5 of 7 during the middle. 40 point loss is what is, but that doesn’t mean the ship is sinking. Losing by 40 to an experienced team and also being short handed is not the end of the world. It’s sports shit happens. Hell Michigan St was down by as many as 23 the other night to Northwestern. Maybe Mack wasn’t the best hire maybe he was. Time will tell.. but I can assure you Pitino wasn’t the right hire in the end either.