According to Josh Heird, that was the big driver in cancelling it. Whether that's the truth is another question.
And I've posted this before, but it helps to appreciate it in the context of an actual example like Heird's comment yesterday...
There's a slight uptick this year (FY2024) in the men's basketball budget. But it's been systematically reduced since Jurich did the last budget in 2018. Until then, the budget regularly increased and outpaced inflation.
When an endeavor that costs money loses significance, you start defunding it. Defunding is exactly what has happened to men's basketball, For the first time that I can remember anyway, an AD just said we made a specific cut for budgetary reasons. And when you look at this chart, you can see how that might happen.
In this bigger picture context, I don't see much reason to be optimistic about men's basketball. If U of L thinks it can and should be defunded, why would any thinking person await more positive outcomes? When U of L starts behaving like basketball matters--not just saying it--I will too...
And I've posted this before, but it helps to appreciate it in the context of an actual example like Heird's comment yesterday...
There's a slight uptick this year (FY2024) in the men's basketball budget. But it's been systematically reduced since Jurich did the last budget in 2018. Until then, the budget regularly increased and outpaced inflation.
When an endeavor that costs money loses significance, you start defunding it. Defunding is exactly what has happened to men's basketball, For the first time that I can remember anyway, an AD just said we made a specific cut for budgetary reasons. And when you look at this chart, you can see how that might happen.
In this bigger picture context, I don't see much reason to be optimistic about men's basketball. If U of L thinks it can and should be defunded, why would any thinking person await more positive outcomes? When U of L starts behaving like basketball matters--not just saying it--I will too...
Last edited: