Mighty SEC team UK SOS = 49 UL = 37
- Thread starter Big East Card
- Start date
- Status
I'm not saying UofL would certainly beat Vandy either....
I'm pointing out your "floor is the ceiling" perspectives about UofL football on the UofL message board aren't appreciated and are getting very old, and quite frankly have no place in these threads.
I do get a kick out of you pointing out our close wins. Great. I'm going to point out your most recent loss. To bottom feeding Vandy, who is awful. Hard to believe that could happen in the midst of a season full of such potential, but college football sure can be crazy.
Take your plastic fork arguments someplace else.
That's crazy because UK is a good football team and may have a special season.
If it wasn't for poor coaching, poor QB play, poor OL play, poor DL play, poor ST play then this truly could've been a "special season." You guys were right there. How did they have a "real chance" at 8-9 wins? Bill is so unbelievably dense.
Bill you are now failing at quote posting.
You aren't giving out reality. You're not providing any salient points.
You're just rambling.
You are the only UK fan bothering to post in any of these threads, the rest went away about a month and a half ago.
That's the weird reality you're literally living in.
You aren't giving out reality. You're not providing any salient points.
You're just rambling.
You are the only UK fan bothering to post in any of these threads, the rest went away about a month and a half ago.
That's the weird reality you're literally living in.
http://realtimerpi.com/college_football/ncaaf_power_rankings.html
Realtime RPI and schedule strength, UK's sos is 43 UofL's is 48.
My other posts were in response to the boards comments about Cardlaw's post.
Realtime RPI and schedule strength, UK's sos is 43 UofL's is 48.
My other posts were in response to the boards comments about Cardlaw's post.
And after this week Louisville will very likely have a stronger SoS...also bottom line Louisville beat it "weak" opponents...Kentucky lost to Vandy...which was crushed by Houston...
In all seriousness, there isn't a a P5 schedule in the country that UK could have gone 9-1 against.
You talkin about Sean White,who replaced Jeremy Johnson on Saturday against Georgia and produced zilch in 6-7 series?That qb?
White is injured, that's why Johnson was playing against UGA.
Apparently an injured White was a better option than a healthy Johnson.
Vanderbilt is playing better now than they were at the beginning of the season and their defense is playing really well. Playing at their place would be problematic. I agree Georgia is not as good this year as last mostly due to QB play. But, both Georgia and Mississippi State are better than UL.
Western was playing well early in the season; Vandy was not. Vandy is not exactly setting the world on fire now, but they took Florida to the wire just a couple of weeks ago. UL has a better defense than UK so I think that would give UL a chance. But, frankly, both teams' offenses are atrocious and Vandy does have a pretty good D of its own. Again, it is all about match ups. I still say it is no better than 50-50 whether UL could have won last Saturday night at Vanderbilt.
Ahh . . . the "Common Opponent" theorem rises again . . . Ole Miss beat Alabama; Memphis beat Ole Miss; ergo, Memphis would beat Alabama. Of course, Navy beat Memphis, so Navy is better than Alabama too.
Makes sense.
Look White is not a good QB, UK making him look like Joe Montana not withstanding. Your team is awful. You're even worse as a poster.
Nobody is going to hold that against you.
This is not the Alabama board though.
Nobody around here wants to read you fawn over them. Maybe if you were a good poster we'd humor you just a bit. But since you aren't, we won't.
Except I didn't draw any conclusion by citing those scores. A horrible poster (not you this time) kept shoving random Vandy talk at us (then again you were part of that too) in this thread so I shoved some random Vandy scores back.
That's it.
The only thing we've learned here is you should be posting on the Alabama board more and here less.
And even if I were to draw that conclusion based on common opponent logic (which I'm not smart guy), it would be 500x better of an argument than the one you made on page 1 where you said UK could be 9-1 with the Louisville schedule and Louisville could be 9-1 with the UK schedule. That was literally the dumbest thing ever said around here, which is really saying something.
Good job on that. I will remember you for that always.
Last edited:
He's so bad, it's just embarrassing really. I can't yell at him. Let's just hope he goes away.
Your screen name is incredibly inappropriate. I can't believe you had the audacity to create that screen name. It's a real insult to Louisville fans.
We think it's 100-0 you are awful.
The Louisville offense is miles ahead of the Vandy offense, only a complete moron would put them in the same hemisphere. Anyone putting those two units in the same breath truly does not know anything about football.
Find an SEC board, you'll make more friends on one of those.
Frankly, you're wrong.
One team's offense is rated in the 110 - 120 range nationally. (Guess who SEC homer)
One team's offense is rated in the 60s nationally. (Guess who - Hint, not Vandy)
In just about any stat site you try to use.
An offense ranked in the 60s is not atrocious. It's average.
You don't now what you're talking about. Do the right thing. Ban yourself.
I agree - a stupendously ignorant comment. I'd rank it right up there with Zipp saying that Petrino would have had Teddy running read option packages.
Probably not, but there were several outside distractions that week, and more than likely an anomaly.
Bottom line is UK let a great opportunity pass them by this year. Their schedule was set up to do really well and they missed. For UK fans, even though some won't admit it, this year is incredibly disappointing. They won't even be favored against a Louisville that completely rebuilt their offense. They can make all the excuses in the world, there were a lot of things going on that week, their staff/team has woefully underperformed. Their offense is worse than last year statistically and their defense (with a defensive minded headcoach) is still ranked outside the top 60 in year 3. That is not progress.
With that said the last game of the year is going to be a close game.
With that said the last game of the year is going to be a close game.
UK has played bad football the majority of the season, and in some games really bad football. The anomaly would be if they played a good game Bill.
If you have to use the distractions excuse to justify needing a furious rally and overtime to beat a I-AA team, you're grasping at straws.
Ok,but he still played 6-7 possessions.I saw him gimping around,but 6-7 possessions?
I doubt I have ever "fawned" over them. In fact, I am probably more critical of Alabama than any Auburn fan. I railed against the BOT for what they did to UAB a few years ago on this very board. Nice try though.
It would be better if you remembered what I actually wrote - and funny enough, it feeds into the "common opponent" silliness. Match ups matter. It may well be that UK matches up against UL's opponents better than UL; the same is true in reverse. It could also be that either matches up worse. That is why I wrote either could be 9-1 and either could be 0-10 if they played the other's schedule. Too complicated?
- Status
