ADVERTISEMENT

Louisville Women are The Sixth Seed

HiStepper

4000+
Gold Member
Aug 1, 2001
4,188
1,727
26
Louisville women wound up being the sixth seed after UNC's loss to VA. A UNC win would have made Louisville tied with FSU for the fifth seed with Louisville getting the seed as a result of their win over FSU
 
Someone please explain why UL is 6th, as that is what ESPN’s regular season standings show this morning? UNC, UL and FSU each tied with conference records at 13-5. UL defeated FSU in their head to head matchup, FSU defeated UNC, and UNC defeated UL; so all three are 1-1 in that 3 way face off. be ahead of FSU.

It appears that UL “got the short end of the seeding process”, when examining all of the numerical available data that is published. NCST and ND tied with 16-2 conference records, but NCST gets #1 as a result of having defeated ND, despite all of the other numerical data favors ND. So what was used to determine that UNC and FSU each are above UL?

This leads me to the AP rankings, as I have yet to see any published Strength of Schedule ratings that at one time was used to play a significant influence in both rankings and seeding for tournaments. Just for those interested, no team in the ACC played as many games involving top 25 AP rated teams as UL, with 12 (4-8). UNC played 8, and FSU only played 6. ND comes closest with 11, while NCST only played 9.

Aside from ACC conference games, UL played UCLA, UConn, Oklahoma and UK. If you look at the AP rankings as of this morning, UL played 5 of the top 10 teams.
 
Someone please explain why UL is 6th, as that is what ESPN’s regular season standings show this morning? UNC, UL and FSU each tied with conference records at 13-5. UL defeated FSU in their head to head matchup, FSU defeated UNC, and UNC defeated UL; so all three are 1-1 in that 3 way face off. be ahead of FSU.

It appears that UL “got the short end of the seeding process”, when examining all of the numerical available data that is published. NCST and ND tied with 16-2 conference records, but NCST gets #1 as a result of having defeated ND, despite all of the other numerical data favors ND. So what was used to determine that UNC and FSU each are above UL?

This leads me to the AP rankings, as I have yet to see any published Strength of Schedule ratings that at one time was used to play a significant influence in both rankings and seeding for tournaments. Just for those interested, no team in the ACC played as many games involving top 25 AP rated teams as UL, with 12 (4-8). UNC played 8, and FSU only played 6. ND comes closest with 11, while NCST only played 9.

Aside from ACC conference games, UL played UCLA, UConn, Oklahoma and UK. If you look at the AP rankings as of this morning, UL played 5 of the top 10 teams.

In the case of a 3-way tie where the head to head round robin is also tied, you go team by team down the standings to break the tie.

In this case, we start with the teams tied at the top of the standings (NC State and Notre Dame). UNC is 1-1 against those teams, having beaten NCSt. FSU is also 1-1, having beaten Notre Dame. UofL loses that tiebreaker and is eliminated because we went 0-3 against those teams.

The tiebreaker rules explicitly state that you do not break the ties before applying this rule, so the fact that NC State is the 1-seed and ND is the 2 doesn’t matter. Because they both finished 16-2, you consider all games UofL, FSU and UNC played against those two teams when applying this tiebreaker.

It is unfortunate for the UofL women that the tiebreaker doesn’t consider that the tie between NC State and Notre Dame is already broken, because if we just consider our games against NC State, UNC wins that tiebreaker and takes 4th, and UofL then gets 5th based on our head to head win over FSU.
 
The draw is tough. But, I think winning two games could go a long way with a favorable NCAAT seed.
 
In the case of a 3-way tie where the head to head round robin is also tied, you go team by team down the standings to break the tie.

In this case, we start with the teams tied at the top of the standings (NC State and Notre Dame). UNC is 1-1 against those teams, having beaten NCSt. FSU is also 1-1, having beaten Notre Dame. UofL loses that tiebreaker and is eliminated because we went 0-3 against those teams.

The tiebreaker rules explicitly state that you do not break the ties before applying this rule, so the fact that NC State is the 1-seed and ND is the 2 doesn’t matter. Because they both finished 16-2, you consider all games UofL, FSU and UNC played against those two teams when applying this tiebreaker.

It is unfortunate for the UofL women that the tiebreaker doesn’t consider that the tie between NC State and Notre Dame is already broken, because if we just consider our games against NC State, UNC wins that tiebreaker and takes 4th, and UofL then gets 5th based on our head to head win over FSU.
Thanks Pushup; the issue is that ESPN has seeded UL 6th, not 5th. That is what I find disconcerting
 
Thanks Pushup; the issue is that ESPN has seeded UL 6th, not 5th. That is what I find disconcerting

That’s because we ARE the 6th seed. We were eliminated in the 3-way tiebreaker because we went 0-3 against NC State and Notre Dame, while FSU and North Carolina went 1-1. So we get assigned the 6 seed, and then FSU wins the head to head against UNC to take the 4-seed.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT