Still no solutions
But there is alot of hot air.
Probably Methane. Need to cycle that.
Still no solutions
It's hard to fathom why some people think our current problems are not 100% the prior regime's fault.
Hm, not sure if serious, since I'm not familiar with you, but, I'll play along. If this were year 1, or two, or three, or perhaps even year 4, you might have a case. This is year 5. It's all Bobby.
...about a fix to a problem, athletics related anyway.
Someone please remind me of these recent examples--just in football--when I start discussing solutions to our problems on the field or court. It's so much wasted effort...[/
- "Anyone's better than Grantham."
- "We need to get Mike Summers back to fix our O-line."
- "Anyone's better than Peter Sirmon."
- "Can't wait to get back to playing 'Bobby Ball'."
It is also a wasted effort to read your post....about a fix to a problem, athletics related anyway.
Someone please remind me of these recent examples--just in football--when I start discussing solutions to our problems on the field or court. It's so much wasted effort...
- "Anyone's better than Grantham."
- "We need to get Mike Summers back to fix our O-line."
- "Anyone's better than Peter Sirmon."
- "Can't wait to get back to playing 'Bobby Ball'."
Then deny any of that...It is also a wasted effort to read your post.
I "worship" their documented accomplishments. Let's have that debate...Some worship Pitino, Petrino, Jurich and Ramsey like they are gods! Sad indeed.
The topic isn't about "solutions". It's about recognizing who else doesn't have any. Understand the difference?...Still no solutions
I "worship" their documented accomplishments. Let's have that debate...
I understand the difference. I don’t understand why that is important or even interesting. This fan base has taken one gut punch after another the last 3 years. You greet every sliver of positive news with snide dismissal. Your every post is constant negativity. There is absolutely no value in this. One need not be a “sunshine pumper” to use facts and analytical skill to argue for a way forward for the athletic department and the university as a whole. The gloom will not dissipate without positive deliberate, action.The topic isn't about "solutions". It's about recognizing who else doesn't have any. Understand the difference?...
I understand the difference. I don’t understand why that is important or even interesting. This fan base has taken one gut punch after another the last 3 years. You greet every sliver of positive news with snide dismissal. Your every post is constant negativity. There is absolutely no value in this. One need not be a “sunshine pumper” to use facts and analytical skill to argue for a way forward for the athletic department and the university as a whole. The gloom will not dissipate without positive deliberate, action.
Hm, not sure if serious, since I'm not familiar with you, but, I'll play along. If this were year 1, or two, or three, or perhaps even year 4, you might have a case. This is year 5. It's all Bobby.
Your school agreed to 'vacate a title', or more precisely, the people now in charge.I will give you TJ and BP documented accomplishments.
But you got nothing for RP except making us the first school to vacate a title and possibly worse.
That's simply the way you look at things which is unfortunate. And exaggerations and superlatives seldom gain you credibility because they're seldom true--in anything.I understand the difference. I don’t understand why that is important or even interesting. This fan base has taken one gut punch after another the last 3 years. You greet every sliver of positive news with snide dismissal. Your every post is constant negativity. There is absolutely no value in this. One need not be a “sunshine pumper” to use facts and analytical skill to argue for a way forward for the athletic department and the university as a whole. The gloom will not dissipate without positive deliberate, action.
Ditto what I just said...There is no point of arguing with Zipp. He has different wants than you. He wants the new regime to fail above all else.
You don't know much about the contract or how to analyze it...Who hired Bobby after he left us for dead once before? Who gave him the ridiculous contract extension that we are now stuck with?
You have no idea how that number compares to any other contract. You just don't like it or the guys involved with it.I'll tell you 14 million things I do know about it.
Give it up, your shtick grew old a long time ago.
Your school agreed to 'vacate a title', or more precisely, the people now in charge.
As far as most fans are concerned, Pitino won a championship and went to three F4s during his U of L tenure...
Who hired Bobby after he left us for dead once before? Who gave him the ridiculous contract extension that we are now stuck with?
You have no idea how that number compares to any other contract. You just don't like it or the guys involved with it.
Educate yourself and become a better poster...
Jurich has already said he would have fought the NCAA result. Amusing how clown show apologists try to deny that.Of all the bizarre stuff you post, you trying to pin the vacating of the title on the “new regime” might be the most entertaining. I know, I know...you are convinced TJ would’ve fought this to the death (even after taking all of Smrt’s wonderful ideas which put UofL in a terrible defensive position). Nonetheless carry on...it is fun to see you try and revise history.
How do you know this?The staff attrition since his return has been a problem. He wanted his DC at Western to come with him...
Old news. That was Petrino's issue after his first tenure...three DCs in four years....Say what you want his inability to hire the right DC has cost him big time.
Holt didn’t come with him because Jurich told him that he’d already hired Grantham to be the DC.How do you know this?
It doesn't matter because Grantham was a couple steps up from Nick Holt IMO.
Old news. That was Petrino's issue after his first tenure...three DCs in four years.
Jurich has already said he would have fought the NCAA result. Amusing how clown show apologists try to deny that.
It's also validation that you know what U of L should have done to save the banners. Otherwise, simply argue that wouldn't have been the right course of action. You can't do that...
That wasn't Jurich's call, it was Ramsey's. And it was a big mistake as I and others said at the time. Ramsey let Smrt go beyond just the investigation. He was a beleaguered Prez who was fighting to look presidential.To rehash this again, he had a chance to fight. Instead he and the rest of decision makers decided to throw themselves at the mercy of the NCAA. Tough to mount a defense when you’ve already basically admitted to everything.
Well, we got the right end of that trade...Holt didn’t come with him because Jurich told him that he’d already hired Grantham to be the DC.