Oh,here we go again.
He was a good man. I miss that man. He didn't need any fancy things or signs. He was a humble man back when racist UK wouldn't play them.
Oh,here we go again.
Troll alert..!He was a good man. I miss that man. He didn't need any fancy things or signs. He was a humble man back when racist UK wouldn't play them.
You realize it was such nonsense the paper took down the story.
Please link the retraction.Sucks that Davis was ruled ineligible........oh wait
Wasn't this the story that was retracted after the Davis family threatened to lawyer up and sue?
At some point - all stories get taken off the digital content. You realize that it was such the opposite of nonsense they printed it.You realize it was such nonsense the paper took down the story.
Slappies doin' that river-in-Egypt dance...Technically, when the topic of the FBI investigation comes up, if you have a basketball team and a shoe deal, you're involved.
Have you read past the remarks in every news account about this thing playing out over a couple years? How long has it been?And yet, nothing. Only the original 10 arrests. Even then, only 8 were indicted. You're tilting at windmills.
Smh, an angry home town writer makes up an unsubstantiated story based on "rumors" and anonymous "sources" and that's good enough huh?At some point - all stories get taken off the digital content. You realize that it was such the opposite of nonsense they printed it.
Please link the retraction.
Ther will be no more arrests or programs taken down. They are struggling with the cases they have.Have you read past the remarks in every news account about this thing playing out over a couple years? How long has it been?
![]()
You’ve got to be kidding - right? Not only is that not a retraction, your dumb link is to a story - a commentary really - written by a guy working for a nonprofit school for journalists in FLA? A guy who was hired based off of his previous gig of running a gossip blog?https://www.poynter.org/news/univer...n-times-remove-payment-rumor-recruiting-story
Found this. Rather than a retraction the sun times just went and re-wrote the article to remove all mention of the unsubstantiated rumor. That's confidence right there. They had nothing and knew it.
The story was taken down and rewritten for a reason. The first story was unsubstantiated. You can continue to believe in it but you're chasing a unicorn.You’ve got to be kidding - right? Not only is that not a retraction, your dumb link is to a story - a commentary really - written by a guy working for a nonprofit school for journalists in FLA? A guy who was hired based off of his previous gig of running a gossip blog?
The story was printed and is there for eternity. What ever happened to the lawsuit - wonder why the davis’ never pursued that? I mean there was no retraction - so he (if innocent) had damages.
I could have done better, but the most informative links were from Kentucky based websites and out of respect for your board I didn't want to link them. I'm sure I could find another link, but I was working out at the time and now I just don't care enough to look againYou’ve got to be kidding - right? Not only is that not a retraction, your dumb link is to a story - a commentary really - written by a guy working for a nonprofit school for journalists in FLA? A guy who was hired based off of his previous gig of running a gossip blog?
The story was printed and is there for eternity. What ever happened to the lawsuit - wonder why the davis’ never pursued that? I mean there was no retraction - so he (if innocent) had damages.
It was substantiated enough to publish it. You act like they made it up out of thin air. Knowing something and being able to prove that thing beyond a shadow of a doubt - don’t always go hand in hand.The story was taken down and rewritten for a reason. The first story was unsubstantiated. You can continue to believe in it but you're chasing a unicorn.
Lol - your respect knows no bounds.I could have done better, but the most informative links were from Kentucky based websites and out of respect for your board I didn't want to link them. I'm sure I could find another link, but I was working out at the time and now I just don't care enough to look again
It was altered with that part removed within a few hours, then changed completely.It was substantiated enough to publish it. You act like they made it up out of thin air. Knowing something and being able to prove that thing beyond a shadow of a doubt - don’t always go hand in hand.
I believe there is legitimacy to the reporting -particularly given the consistent “rumors” of the way that sweaty cal has run every program he’s ever been in charge of. You want to believe it’s a unicorn because it involves the yuts. You’d sing a different tune if this occurred while SC was still at Memphis and davis had ended up there.
Goodness, there has never been a valid claim that Cal has violated the rules. You can hate him and that's understandable, but you can't substantiate your belief.It was substantiated enough to publish it. You act like they made it up out of thin air. Knowing something and being able to prove that thing beyond a shadow of a doubt - don’t always go hand in hand.
I believe there is legitimacy to the reporting -particularly given the consistent “rumors” of the way that sweaty cal has run every program he’s ever been in charge of. You want to believe it’s a unicorn because it involves the yuts. You’d sing a different tune if this occurred while SC was still at Memphis and davis had ended up there.
Don’t need to - it’s taken as accepted fact everywhere outside of lexington. You’re presumably the one who’s changed direction and started swimming upstream on this issue.Goodness, there has never been a valid claim that Cal has violated the rules. You can hate him and that's understandable, but you can't substantiate your belief.
Ther will be no more arrests or programs taken down. They are struggling with the cases they have.
Oh, so group think is right, even if it's wrong. Interesting.Don’t need to - it’s taken as accepted fact everywhere outside of lexington. You’re presumably the one who’s changed direction and started swimming upstream on this issue.
Hmm. You told me, and you are correct, that I couldn't know with certainty what I claimed. It is my strong belief that nothing else will happen.Unless you work for the FBI and are involved in the cases (which I highly doubt) there is no way you could know this.
Where there is smoke.....there is usually fire. Schools with Shoe contracts, whether it be with NIKE, ADIDAS or Under Armor, and multiple 5 star recruits; have great reason to be concerned.
Time will tell. When the stuff hits the fan, big blue nation will not be immune from another mark on their illustrious history of shame. It is only a matter of time. It follows Cal wherever he goes.....no denying the sanctions UMass and U Mempiss experienced.
Says who? You?Ther will be no more arrests or programs taken down. They are struggling with the cases they have.
Yet you have zero proof. Only wishful thinking. I see "fact" tossed around so frequently on this board. But no one has any facts regarding UK cheating in the current landscape. Apparently the NCAA isn't as convinced as you guys since they just appointed him to a committee tasked to clean up college ball
Lol - Most unintentionally ironic statement in the history of the internet.Oh, so group think is right, even if it's wrong. Interesting.
Probably but that doesn't change the facts.Lol - Most unintentionally ironic statement in the history of the internet.
You are comically lacking in self awareness. Thanks for the laugh though.
That's a great movie. I really don't care what Mattie bangs says or does so you can throw that at me all you want.![]()
You have a reading comprehension.
I never said SuCkS is cheating (LoL) by signing 75 five stars since 2009.
Only one title with all those NBA players , but I digress.
Appointing crapipperi to clean up the NCAA is akin to the fox guarding the hen house.
According to the NCAA, Crapipperi's previous two stops resulted in vacated final fours
and other sanctions.
Besides, your fellow fans accused him of being dirty at Memphis.
Do you need to see Mattie bangs jones quote again.
Good for youll's big blew integrity for hiring the dirty coach......
Whatever you need to tell yourself to get to sleep sweet pea...Probably but that doesn't change the facts.
Hmm. You told me, and you are correct, that I couldn't know with certainty what I claimed. It is my strong belief that nothing else will happen.
Then you say with certainty something you can't know and support your position with a falsehood. To put it briefly, Cal has never been accused of a major NCAA violation. That's a fact.
In the UMASS situation, an NCAA investigator called Cal a "victim". The Rose situation is laughable. The transgression wasn't proven and happened well before Rose was even on the team.
As for schools being concerned, no, the contract and player ratings are irrelevant. A school who has cheated does need to worry. A school that has not cheated has nothing to worry about.
Yes, time will tell.
Did I miss any pure coincidences?
- Prior Lite coaching gigs led to vacated Final Fours.
- Lite signs twice the number of shoe kids as any other team.
- The FBI is investigating shoe companies.
![]()
I don't know, you tend to believe in things you can't see or prove. I'm a sucker for a good squatch conversation. One day we're gonna find that big bashful dude.Your point?
![]()
I don't know, you tend to believe in things you can't see or prove. I'm a sucker for a good squatch conversation. One day we're gonna find that big bashful dude.
If you can somehow link BigFoot to the list of "coincidences", I'll be glad to start including it. The other three are solid...I don't know, you tend to believe in things you can't see or prove. I'm a sucker for a good squatch conversation. One day we're gonna find that big bashful dude.
There were zero violation's given to Cal. Zero. You're welcome to prove me wrong though.You serious Clark? Fact: Cal was the coach at UMass when the NCAA sanctioned that program. Fact: Cal was the coach when the NCAA sanctioned UMemphis. What were the sanctions for? and who was the HC? or are you too stupid to link that together in your mind?
The NCAA had enough proof to level the sanctions. No revisionist history can change that. You need to step up your schtick.
Well, who could argue with that logic.Did I miss any pure coincidences?
- Prior Lite coaching gigs led to vacated Final Fours.
- Lite signs twice the number of shoe kids as any other team.
- The FBI is investigating shoe companies.
![]()
It's kinda the smoke-and-fire analysis I've heard applied to Pitino and U of L. Same standards.There were zero violation's given to Cal. Zero. You're welcome to prove me wrong though.