Doesn't the dorm that the basketball players live in have cameras all on the outside and in the halls? It would seem to me that they would be able to prove or disprove that the girls came over or not. Or who let them in a side door etc etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IF this happened and I emphasize IF.....with everyone owning a cell phone and taking pics of everything, I would not be surprised if there are pics out there. Just because she didn't put them in the book doesn't mean they don't exist. Just going to have to see how it plays out.
IF this happened and I emphasize IF.....with everyone owning a cell phone and taking pics of everything, I would not be surprised if there are pics out there. Just because she didn't put them in the book doesn't mean they don't exist. Just going to have to see how it plays out.
That's what Deener asked the guy from ESPN this morning. Why were there not more incriminating pics in this day and age? Of course the guy sounded offended at first and then said that it was a good question.Interesting point. Where are the pics? I've seen 1. Only 1, and that 1 just shows a former player at what looks to be a party. It doesn't say Minardi Hall in the background. It doesn't say this is dorm room number 232 or whatever. It just shows a former player sitting on a freaking couch with a bunch of people around him.
Lots and lots of cell phones everywhere thanks to Steve Jobs changing our world. Where are the damn pictures at? Where are the damn videos that cell phones can record?????
And all were dressed. So what?I have seen quite a few pics that have been posted. One of Montrez, a couple of the dancers in a doorway at the dorm, one with a recruit as well as the one with Russ someone mentioned. There are actually quite a few pics that show them in that dorm and were shown in the OTL segment...
I have seen quite a few pics that have been posted. One of Montrez, a couple of the dancers in a doorway at the dorm, one with a recruit as well as the one with Russ someone mentioned. There are actually quite a few pics that show them in that dorm and were shown in the OTL segment...
Obvious? To who? Those who want it to be a dorm room? Also, how do we know they had sex if they're not actually having sex? I've been around plenty of whores without having sex with them. Ever been to Vegas?The issue is that alleged prostitutes were actually in the dorm as she said and posed with recruits and players like she said. It is obvious from these pics that they were in the dorm so why the need for video?
Or even a recorded incriminating audio statementIt is hard to believe there are no pictures or video's that capture players/recruits in compromising positions or the money being thrown around to the dancers or even of the girls dancing. If she knew this day was coming then what is better than pictures and videos?
It is hard to believe there are no pictures or video's that capture players/recruits in compromising positions or the money being thrown around to the dancers or even of the girls dancing. If she knew this day was coming then what is better than pictures and videos?
That's because nothing to the degree she claimed happened. This went on for four years and no leak from a disgruntled player or a picture posted on twitter under a fake name?
We knew about a player sneaking around smoking dope and why he was suspended before it went down. I think this has a little more to it than that.
I believe the only thing that was confirmed by a non anonymous source was dancers were in the room.
Then we have the NCAA spurn. Reporting an incident does not happen that way Powell wrote about. If you call the NCAA, they'll point you to the compliance office of the school.you have a complaint against. Every complaint is investigated.
There is a procedure for how to report to one school about another.
You can even report it anonymously to UofL's compliance office.
I maintain a position that Wilder was angling for something during their meeting.
He basically went out an punched UofL right in the mouth intentionally to rattle them.
The press releases/interviews were set up first and then the meeting with UofL was conveniently scheduled afterward in order gauge UofL's reaction.
UofL came out behind Pitino. That in itself speaks volumes on what UofL knows and most important cannot confirm.
The longer this takes, the worse it becomes for Powell. They wanted a quick hit and a surrender to sell books. Once it dies down, no more demand for the book and no more money.
What point are you trying to make? If you are alleging that she is lying about calling the NCAA, then I suppose that is possible. But why would she lie about that? It doesn't help her story and adds nothing to it. Also, there is no way someone in her position would simply contact the school and expect anything to come of it. In fact, I suspect she would be scared to contact the school, regardless of whether she was telling the truth. And she couldn't contact another school to help because she would be laughed off the phone (because the allegations seem absurd on their face), which is likely what happened when she called the NCAA. Frankly, I am surprised a publisher even listened, but it paid off for them. It probably explains why a small publisher was used here because others wouldn't touch it, and the Indiana connection probably also helped get the balling rolling. Sort of a perfect storm.Just another tidbit to prove my point (courtesy of TOS, DasVille). Also did IBJ Book Publishing LLC exist back then?
"The IBJ on Monday asked the NCAA whether Powell had made such a call, but the NCAA wouldn't comment. Powell claims she made the call back in March, before she approached an IBJ sister company, IBJ Book Publishing LLC, with her story"
http://www.fox19.com/story/30191674/report-stripper-tried-to-take-uofl-sex-claims-to-ncaa-in-march
What point are you trying to make? If you are alleging that she is lying about calling the NCAA, then I suppose that is possible. But why would she lie about that? It doesn't help her story and adds nothing to it. Also, there is no way someone in her position would simply contact the school and expect anything to come of it. In fact, I suspect she would be scared to contact the school, regardless of whether she was telling the truth. And she couldn't contact another school to help because she would be laughed off the phone (because the allegations seem absurd on their face), which is likely what happened when she called the NCAA. Frankly, I am surprised a publisher even listened, but it paid off for them. It probably explains why a small publisher was used here because others wouldn't touch it, and the Indiana connection probably also helped get the balling rolling. Sort of a perfect storm.
Those are fair arguments. It is certainly possible that she is lying about what happened when she called the NCAA, and there is no question that she is in this for one thing (money), and that there is potentially a weird IU connection (or some other backer helping to orchestrate this). However, as to her call to the NCAA, I am still trying to figure out why she would lie about what was said to her. There is no motive to do so. To the contrary, it might just piss off the NCAA. Moreover, if she is trying to embellish, wouldn't it be more sensational to say that she did report this UofL but the school failed to act, and/or she did report this to the Louisville media but they failed to act? That would be juicy. It is not really juicy and serves no purpose for her to randomly say that she contacted a receptionist type person at the NCAA who basically blew her off (no pun intended).Her story changes from the book narrative too often. Not saying she lied, but that her story does appear to have some severe credibility issues at times. Even her own publisher is going back over her story AFTER the book publishing. Odd given that Cady (writer) said the information had been researched (vetted).
Read the link I posted from Michigan's Athletics Department's website. All allegations are investigated.
It's easy to contact any NCAA school in regards to filing a complaint. The NCAA would instruct you to do so since they do not investigate alleged complaints. They are done by the compliance department of the school in which the allegation is against.
UofL even has an anonymous way to do so:
http://www.gocards.com/sb_output.aspx?form=10
Powell was most likely given instructions on how to proceed and did not like it because she would not benefit from it. So she went elsewhere.
A member school would be obligated to assist her. This would be handle discreetly. The NCAA has specific guidelines in regards to what to do.
By the way, from time to time the NCAA engages compliance departments to ensure they are following the rules. I would say failing to comply would be dealt with severely.
Then we have the publisher. We know from what has been said, she looked outside of Louisville for a someone to publish her story. But why a book? Usually a book comes out after the dust settles and the punishments have been levied. It provided depth and explanation to the events.
Why not contact the CJ? It's no secret that they are not exactly fond of UofL in some respects. Pat Forde at Yahoo Sports has been at odds with UofL from time to time too.
Odd that she picked a publisher that so happened to have been supposedly outspoken in his personal dislike of Rick Pitino. Can't find a link, but enough chatter out there to make it plausible.
Was it blind luck that she found a publisher who disliked Pitino? Maybe?
I would say given how he runs his business that when this came across his desk, his eyes lit up and a smile came across his face.
I'll go even farther to say that a lot of the story has been "embellished" and eventually will dwindle to something far less than what's being assumed to be fact today.
Those are fair arguments. It is certainly possible that she is lying about what happened when she called the NCAA, and there is no question that she is in this for one thing (money), and that there is potentially a weird IU connection (or some other backer helping to orchestrate this). However, as to her call to the NCAA, I am still trying to figure out why she would lie about what was said to her. There is no motive to do so. To the contrary, it might just piss off the NCAA. Moreover, if she is trying to embellish, wouldn't it be more sensational to say that she did report this UofL but the school failed to act, and/or she did report this to the Louisville media but they failed to act? That would be juicy. It is not really juicy and serves no purpose for her to randomly say that she contacted a receptionist type person at the NCAA who basically blew her off (no pun intended).
As I believe is the case with a lot of her story, she could have said far more and made things sound far worse (in ways that were difficult to contradict) if she was really trying to make things up and embellish. She could have said there was tons of sex. She could have said she contacted UofL. She could have omitted that certain recruits did not engage in sex. She could have definitely stated that McGee told her that Pitino (or other coaches) were aware or complicit. My point is that while UofL fans understandably are trying to poke holes in her story and feel like she is lying about a lot of stuff, it seems to me that she could have safely said a lot more if she really wanted to lie to make her story even better.