A little good news and bad news in there...
The good is that the LAA simply got someone--anyone--to step up esp. in these times. I didn't think that would happen. And the dollar amount is almost the same even though I highly doubt Yum! Brands had any competition.
The bad news is that the dollar amount IS about the same. Over the time frame in the graph below, naming rights revenue will have increased about 14%, which is a paltry 0.7% annualized rate of increase. The last decade, inflation has been pretty low. So, a more or less fixed income stream was no big deal. Not necessarily so going forward when most are expecting much higher inflation.
One expense that we know will inflate and by how much is the annual debt service. I've projected expenses over the next decade reflecting ONLY that increase, i.e., all other expenses remaining flat for ten years (which we know isn't going to happen). This graph reflects a constant naming rights revenue stream--$1.48 million/yr--as a percentage of the annual expenses. Naming rights revenue will service that debt by an amount that declines from around 9% now to 6.5%.
And of course we know there will be issues with other arena revenue streams, notably the TIF which is (or was) ten times larger than the naming rights. We have revenues that are flat or declining, expenses that are increasing, and an arena net position that is barely positive, relatively speaking. Today's headline notwithstanding, that's a bad mix...