Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think so. Here is the rule... Occasionally, the defense will succeed in blocking a field goal. If a blocked field goal is in or behind the neutral zone, it is treated like a fumble and can be advanced by either team. Beyond the neutral zone, a blocked kick is treated like a punt and can be advanced only by the defense, unless a defensive player fumbles the ball, after which an offensive player can advance it.Gentlemen THAT was a live ball. We had touched the ball prior to it's reaching the LOS and he had to either recover it OR return it. Pretty simple. He's football player and you ALWAYS attempt to make plays to help your team win games.
GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!! God Bless America!!!
I don't think so. Here is the rule... Occasionally, the defense will succeed in blocking a field goal. If a blocked field goal is in or behind the neutral zone, it is treated like a fumble and can be advanced by either team. Beyond the neutral zone, a blocked kick is treated like a punt and can be advanced only by the defense, unless a defensive player fumbles the ball, after which an offensive player can advance it.
Alexander may have not know the rule regarding the field position - I'll bet most on this board didn't either. It was a live ball able to be advanced and he made an aggressive play. Besides LJ, he's the most elusive open field guy UofL has - had he taken it back 60 yards, or even scored - which he's more than capable of doing - everyone would have talked about what a fantastic play it was.It wasn't a smart play and cost UofL 20 yards of field position.
Alexander may have not know the rule regarding the field position - I'll bet most on this board didn't either. It was a live ball able to be advanced and he made an aggressive play. Besides LJ, he's the most elusive open field guy UofL has - had he taken it back 60 yards, or even scored - which he's more than capable of doing - everyone would have talked about what a fantastic play it was.
Many may remember this happened in the Alabama Auburn game the year Auburn won the NC. Last play of the game Alabama was going for a field goal Auburn blocked it and ran it back for a score giving Auburn the TD the lead and the win.
That was a different scenario though because there was no time left on the clock so there was incentive to running the ball back
Calling it right the first time is generally the fix in the case of the fumble.They didn't blow the targeting call, the NCAA blew it by making officials enforce a stupid, draconian penalty. According to the letter of the law, the officials called that correctly.
As for the disputed fumble, I just don't see how there was enough evidence to overturn.
Calling it right the first time is generally the fix in the case of the fumble.
I don't think the rule is draconian...but when the helmet contact is incidental and not a part of the "hit", it shouldn't be called.
Purdue fan and UGA grad. Can add some thoughts here.
It was 9 false starts. Pretty bad. That's terrible. You guys were definitely the more talented team but you kept us in it with silly plays and penalties. Jackson is a force. We'd have had 4-5 sacks last night facing any other QB. Refs interjected themselves too much last night IMO. They blew the targeting call big time. Blew the 3rd goal line fumble call too.
I don't think you guys compete for the ACC, but win 9 games and unless somebody on a better team has a crazy year, Jackson could easily cruise to the heisman again.
As a UGA grad I can attest, Grantham is a giant piece of human excrement. Locker room and staff room cancer. Good recruiter but both of UGAs last 2 DCs since him have been better both at scheming and recruiting. Nobody at UGA misses him. I doubt long term that you will miss him either.