Tell how you like it when we 4-8 next year.
You are riding a fence there. Tell us all, in your infinite wisdom, what is going to happen. Are we going to suck? If we do, should we fire CBP? If so, who do we hire? I am a bit surprised to see you show up here and start complaining. Are you the real MMc and if so, did you get run out of the other sites? Go on record.
MM is a well known loser troll from way back.
Jay Reimenschneider-Card Fan 1130- etc...
What next Jay? Nick Papagiorgio?
In the acc we are a 9 win program imo. We not playing uconn and usf no more. These games are tough but we have recruited a whole lot better. Think about this, we won 8 games last year and lost our bowl and we actually may get the best recruiting class I the history of our program
That's progress. All I ask each year is 10 wins and that includes the bowl. So if he goes 9-3 and wins the bowl that's a great season
If he goes 10-2 and loses the bowl that's a great season. 9 wins is a good season and 8 wins is disappointing.
I’d gladly trade a win over Clemson for a win over UK, if and only if we were going to make the ACC championship game. If our conference schedule didn’t go well, take the Uk win. If we have a chance give her to the ACCCG, no contest, take Clemson.U of L fans, all I hear are crickets...
I’d argue that the offense is at least as good as it was in Bobby 1.0. The problem is that we even the weak ACC teams pose match-up problems to us at times. See Wake forest this year, a senior QB torched our suspect secondary. BC ran right through us. If we could just balance the talent on both sides of the ball, which is beginning to happen, then we should take care of teams like these.Not really seeing this increase in talent regardless of what the recruit rankings are. I saw more talent in the program in 2004-2006 than we have now. I also saw a more polished offense and I don't think anyone can just attribute that to the schedule. The 2006 schedule was not a cake walk.
Not really seeing this increase in talent regardless of what the recruit rankings are. I saw more talent in the program in 2004-2006 than we have now. I also saw a more polished offense and I don't think anyone can just attribute that to the schedule. The 2006 schedule was not a cake walk.
Personally in think the 2017 class and this 2018 class are really good. I just don't think this 2006 team or the teddy teams would lose one game with this schedule. 2006 I remember it well. Wvu, cincy, rutgers were really good but they weren't better then clemson. I would say ncstate is better then that cincy and rutgers team from 2006. Fsu and BC I would think are better then usf and we only played 7 conference games in 2006
Kstate was mediocre that year and so was miami. Kentucky won 8 games that year so they were good. The beginning of that season that schedule looked good but in the end it was solid. This 2017 team would of went 11-1 as well with that 2006 schedule.
Except to win the conference--which is the higher goal--how does that trade help you? Losing to LPT in football is an embarrassment. It would diminish your resume as far as a national championship which is the ultimate goal.I’d gladly trade a win over Clemson for a win over UK, if and only if we were going to make the ACC championship game. If our conference schedule didn’t go well, take the Uk win. If we have a chance give her to the ACCCG, no contest, take Clemson.
That’s a fair point, but if you only lose 1 and win the ACC you can still get to and win the title. See Clemson embarrassing loss to Pitt.Except to win the conference--which is the higher goal--how does that trade help you? Losing to LPT in football is an embarrassment. It would diminish your resume as far as a national championship which is the ultimate goal.
And while you SAY that would be a good trade, I really wanna hear the fanbase unite in late-Nov after an embarrassing loss like that and re-celebrate the Atlantic Division title. It sounds like the right trade in principle--I wanna see it in practice 'cuz I don't believe you'd have much company. In fact, I can hear the Petrino-can-finally-beat-Clemson-and-still-can't-handle-LPT griping...
Yes, but we could each create all sorts of hypotheticals where winning or losing any single game doesn't matter.That’s a fair point, but if you only lose 1 and win the ACC you can still get to and win the title. See Clemson embarrassing loss to Pitt.
This is correct, but your first question was about a trading Clemson win for a Kentucky win. But yes ideally we would add a Clemson win to the fold and have a 10-11 win season.Yes, but we could each create all sorts of hypotheticals where winning or losing any single game doesn't matter.
The question is, in a vacuum, how does trading something like a Clemson win for an LPT loss help you? One sends you into orbit, the other brings you crashing to Earth. You end up about where you are now in terms of how the majority think.
The only way you make true progress is ADDING a win like Clemson to your resume. And that's simply the desire to win more games couched in a debate that Petrino can't beat ranked teams. That's a specious argument...
Tell how you like it when we 4-8 next year.
I’m a gambler too. Craps. (Rollem)I'd personally lay down 5% of my yearly salary that we will win more than 4 games next season. That wager presents excellent value and yes, I am a gambler.