You've given pretty much nothing but your anti-UK opinion rather than fact and try to back it up with cherry-picked stats... Here's a basic illustration of what you do rather than acknowledge facts...
I'm sorry, I didn't know you were logging every one of my posts. (I should have guessed that a courier job allowed for that.) I'll catch up now, scout's honor...
...In reference to fan celebrations-- I say all was not all 'peace and quiet' in the Ville. Zipp: "Find evidence otherwise." OneEarWonder then posts "Riot police had to be dispersed around campus to quell a riotous crowd." (States he has a relative working in that capacity to back it up. ) Zipp: Silence...
The Ear guy's just another slapd!ck. You're gonna need a more credible source than that, esp. if you agree with him.
...Zipp: "Tubby was run off." I point out that Tubby hired an agent in DECEMBER the year o his final season at UK. Also link an article that was account of Crum's departure from Louisville to provide a better look at what being "run off" looks like. Zipp: Silence (again)...
Unlike Pitino Lite, Tubby never missed an NCAA tournament. He left because he knew a hooded LPT lynch mob was forming. Crum had losing records two of his last three seasons. Slight difference.
...Me: Name me 1 more coach other than Coach K that has had a better past 6 years than Cal. Zipp: "Sounds like it's time to start a great run banner like all of the elite programs have hanging" (To which he is called out for clearly not wanting to answer the question)...
I'm not going back to link it, but I responded "Pitino" for one. One title and no NITs in the last six years. The banner was a reference to all of the other non-elite program garbage (e.g., "a good run") you wanna talk about.
...Zipp: "Pitino has had the better past 6 years because....no NIT's" Me: ...uh, he's taken uofl to the NIT TWICE. Zipp: Silence...
Not since Pitino Lite rolled into town. Shall we use the same timeframes to compare? You know, for consistency?
...Zipp: "All of those UK wins and conference titles came in the SEC." Me: UK currently has 923 Non-conference wins. (Conference titles...of course all in the SEC. UK hasn't ever needed to jump around to what is now 6 conferences for uofl.)
LPT clearly had what it wanted from the beginning--a basketball conference it could dominate. U of L "jumped around" to improve its conference affiliation. Another slight difference.
...Zipp: "Your conference schedule is a dumpster fire." Me: You mean like BC, Wake, FSU, Ga Tech, Va Tech, Pitt and Clemson? .....not exactly a murderer's row. Zipp: "Oh, and some of the better ACC teams are played ON THE ROAD, remember what that is?" Me: 2015-2016 Louisville schedule....Duke, ND and VA on the road. (Still not sure how 'good' VA will be next year).... so possibly 3 tough road games. Zipp: Silence...
Silence here can likely be interpreted as being dumbfounded at LPT stupidity... The 38-1 "good run" was against ONE team that barely made the Sagarin Top Ten (UNC at #10). U of L played SEVEN games against that same Top Ten. Hell, what more needs to be said?
...Zipp: "Mulder was passed over by Pitino. Pitino got the guys he wanted, you guys got Mulder." Me: Yeah, I'm sure RP didn't want the JUCO POY." Zipp: silence...
I'm sure his mother thinks he's a fine boy too. But Pitino clearly got the two guys he wanted. Wasn't room for a non-elite guy named "Mulder".
...Zipp: "NCAA Tournament bids mean nothing." Me: Uh... yes they do....they mean you had to have a good season to get one." Zipp: "Well, the other teams not named UK went 2-4 in the tournament." (So now to shift away from the fact that 5 SEC teams got bids to the tournament, now it only matters how they did after getting there.)...
Another example of LPT lowering the bar... What you do in the NCAA tourney is evidently less important.
...Zipp: "Two of the teams in your conference--a 14 team league account for all but one of those NCAA Titles." Me: "...and yet the title count between the 2 conferences is 13-11....with the ACC holding a 2 title lead." (Now that Maryland has left the ACC.... 3 ACC teams account for all but one of those 13 titles....)
Quoting out of context, naturally... The debate was about the strength of your schedule. And as I've said, you can't play against yourself. Deduct 8 from that 11. If you wanna play against a conference with 13 titles already, apply for ACC membership. Oops, there goes any shot at 40-0!!
...Me: "The SEC is a member of the Power 5 conferences on an annual basis." Zipp: "That Power 5 designation only comes from the football side of things." (Same designation is usin basketball, but apparently that doesn't matter here.)
Sorry, that's just LPT ignorance--or denial--of the basis for the Power 5 designation. I'd kinda expect that denial from a basketball school. Those are the five best football conferences, not necessarily basketball.
...Zipp: "Pitino Lite." Me: Cal is 7-1 against RP since coming to UK. Zipp: "LPT" ....Me and other UK posters: Your team is 15-33 in basketball and 13-14 in football against an alleged "play toy".
When Matt Hayes of The Sporting News comes off that moniker, so will I. Keep me updated.
...Me and other UK posters: "If Cal 'can't coach', how can he be 7-1 against RP since becoming UK's coach?" Zipp: Super Bowl...
Don't whine to us. Pitino Lite came up with that term. I just happen to agree with him. With your junk basketball schedule, who's to argue?
...Me: "It's funny how the football game between UK and uofl "matters"...and somehow the basketball game isn't all that 'important'." Zipp: Super Bowl...
Nonsensical courier-babble... You'll have to explain yourself a little better.
...As you can see....just a litany of deflecting, changing the question or simply refusing to answer. Like I said before....denial just ain't a river in Egypt.
Let me know when you think I'm ignoring you again. No reason for an LPT courier and a fan of an elite basketball program to have an inferiority complex.
"Elite program", my a$$...