CBP just wasn’t a likeable guy. That always makes it worse. Probably not fair, but people naturally cut someone they like a little slack.
- I actually agree with Zipp on the local media and fans “ dancing on Petrino’s grave.” To put it mildly, the local media sucks. Where were these harsh opinion pieces while Petrino was still in town and employed? That’s right, there weren’t any. The local media is the most mosquito-dicked bunch I’ve ever seen.
- As for the fans trashing Petrino, I get it, but try to do so with some modicum of appreciation for what that man did here. Without bias, he’s the most successful coach in program history with 3-4 of the best seasons we’ve ever had. In equivalent terms, he wasn’t much worse this year than Denny Crum’s final basketball season. Show a little respect even if the new hire and change was well-warranted
Invitation to meet him at the next women’s basketball game - or other non-revenue sport - inbound in 3, 2, 1...But if you want Vince NQ to look bad, the best way for that to happen is for his coaching hires to fail. For them to fail, UofL must lose, or be in some other way embarrassed. Therefore, you must cheer against UofL, in order for the guy you dislike (apparently for no other reason than he’s not “Tom”) to look bad. The best message board for those that wish for UofL to lose or be embarrassed is the UK board. Should you not be there, with like-minded people?
BTW, coaches, like everybody else, care about other things besides money. But, like everyone else, with other things being equal, money is a powerful motivator. Nothing wrong with that.
They care about money at the end of the day it drives all of us. I agree at some point though money stops being the driving factor. With what these coaches make unless they are stupid money is no concern.But if you want Vince NQ to look bad, the best way for that to happen is for his coaching hires to fail. For them to fail, UofL must lose, or be in some other way embarrassed. Therefore, you must cheer against UofL, in order for the guy you dislike (apparently for no other reason than he’s not “Tom”) to look bad. The best message board for those that wish for UofL to lose or be embarrassed is the UK board. Should you not be there, with like-minded people?
BTW, coaches, like everybody else, care about other things besides money. But, like everyone else, with other things being equal, money is a powerful motivator. Nothing wrong with that.
I don't care who the coach is they better have strong assistants. They better be able to develop those assistants. Ideally, they need to keep their key assistants in place for years 5 to 6 years. Pitino was terrific at identifying terrific assistants then developing them. What cost him in the end was the decision to find recruiters instead of finding great assistants coaches.
Petrino first go around he had really good assistants. The critical mistake Jurich made in bringing Petrino back was he didn't look beyond Petrino. He failed to grasp how toxic Petrino had become in the coaching world. The original staff that was brought in was terrific, but none of those key guys stayed. He had no one is his coaching tree.
Do you want the US to fail economically or militarily if you don't like Donald Trump? Do you want misfortune to come to other people in government and society? Do others question your allegiance and patriotism?But if you want Vince NQ to look bad, the best way for that to happen is for his coaching hires to fail. For them to fail, UofL must lose, or be in some other way embarrassed. Therefore, you must cheer against UofL, in order for the guy you dislike (apparently for no other reason than he’s not “Tom”) to look bad. The best message board for those that wish for UofL to lose or be embarrassed is the UK board. Should you not be there, with like-minded people?
BTW, coaches, like everybody else, care about other things besides money. But, like everyone else, with other things being equal, money is a powerful motivator. Nothing wrong with that.
No question, attending games has nothing to do with being a fan.Invitation to meet him at the next women’s basketball game - or other non-revenue sport - inbound in 3, 2, 1...
No one's feeling sorry for him. This is about mouth breathers who can't let him go quietly...Hard to feel too bad for a guy that walked away with 14 million. Give me 14 mill you can say anything you want about me true or otherwise.
The local media is superficial and self absorbed. They dislike people who disrespect them and love people who recognize them. It biases how they think and report "news". I actually enjoy it when people like Petrino hold them in disdain...Local media consists of guys like Nick Coffey. In fact, he typifies local media in this city. Weak and I’ll-informed.
The guy had us one yard from an ACC Atlantic Division title and beating the team that won the national championship that year. On their home field. In 2016, he took us to heights that we’d only approached once before (in 2006).
All of that is the reason why I absolutely hate the take that Petrino 2.0 sucked. This last year sucked. He did give up, as did the team, after the soul crushing loss to FSU. The other 4 years of V2 definitely did NOT suck.
Could be that you attend events like that because you’re bored because you’ve nothing better to do - might also explain the 40K posts - or because they’re free, or nearly so.No question, attending games has nothing to do with being a fan.
I don't recall inviting you to meet me. I recall you coming up to me and introducing yourself like I really needed to know who you are. Maybe I misled you...
Flawed analogy. If you disagree with the president, you continue to agitate for policies more aligned with your own, which includes persuading the president to change his views. You also can petition congress, and you have periodic elections in which you can participate in an effort to change policy. It isn’t necessary to wish for the president to look bad and hope for his failure in order that he be eventually replaced with someone more to your liking. A better analogy might be the national debt. In this scenario, you would be the one wishing for the debt to explode, until the point where the country suffers a financial calamity, bringing down the government and society with it. Only then would the country be re-ordered to your liking, because the “clowns” can never be trusted to do it right. I guess this would be patriotism of a sort. Not the sort I would find admirable.Do you want the US to fail economically or militarily if you don't like Donald Trump? Do you want misfortune to come to other people in government and society? Do others question your allegiance and patriotism?
I need to understand those differences...
Local media consists of guys like Nick Coffey. In fact, he typifies local media in this city. Weak and I’ll-informed.
Your way to respond or what you think is "necessary" is your business. I was asked--again--how I can be against "Vince" and a fan of U of L, and I offered a perfectly good and familiar analogy. If you don't like it, again, that's your business.Flawed analogy. If you disagree with the president, you continue to agitate for policies more aligned with your own, which includes persuading the president to change his views. You also can petition congress, and you have periodic elections in which you can participate in an effort to change policy. It isn’t necessary to wish for the president to look bad and hope for his failure in order that he be eventually replaced with someone more to your liking. A better analogy might be the national debt. In this scenario, you would be the one wishing for the debt to explode, until the point where the country suffers a financial calamity, bringing down the government and society with it. Only then would the country be re-ordered to your liking, because the “clowns” can never be trusted to do it right. I guess this would be patriotism of a sort. Not the sort I would find admirable.
Your way to respond or what you think is "necessary" is your business. I was asked--again--how I can be against "Vince" and a fan of U of L, and I offered a perfectly good and familiar analogy. If you don't like it, again, that's your business.
There's also an element of tough love to this situation. How can you love a stubborn child while hoping he/she learns life's lessons? Those lessons are painful. Maybe U of L needs to experience a little more pain...
I don't think U of L athletics is experiencing any pain, maybe a little anxiety.More pain? I don’t know if that’s possible. I’m a Jurich guy, but eventually you got to move on. Tyra is doing a good job. That’s not hard to admit.
Speaking of news flashes, you're getting them anyway. I thought you weren't clicking on my posts(?) Try the 'ignore' feature...Could be that you attend events like that because you’re bored because you’ve nothing better to do - might also explain the 40K posts - or because they’re free, or nearly so.
You absolutely didn’t need to know who I am and news flash - you still don’t. In the same sense, no one here needs, and in many cases wants, your opinions. If only they were like me saying hello - a one time thing.
The problem in all of this nonsense, Zipp, is illustrated by your own analogy. If someone doesn't like a particular President, in your example, you seem to suggest that it is still only prudent to hope for a good economy, good military responses, etc under that President because the success of the country is the most important thing. Yet you openly revel in Tyra's one "failure" so far (not landing Brohm, which he rectified by landing Satterfield), and you openly blame only him for the current financial problems faced by the athletic department (when he inherited a number of those problems), and you seem to push for some sort of return of the previous AD, all of which suggests your motivation is simply to boast about the prior regime and not move forward. I guess only time will tell, but I think Tyra has done a good job under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.Your way to respond or what you think is "necessary" is your business. I was asked--again--how I can be against "Vince" and a fan of U of L, and I offered a perfectly good and familiar analogy. If you don't like it, again, that's your business.
There's also an element of tough love to this situation. How can you love a stubborn child while hoping he/she learns life's lessons? Those lessons are painful. Maybe U of L needs to experience a little more pain...
I appreciate your tracking of what I want and don't want to see, but your understanding in just about each instance is somewhat off...The problem in all of this nonsense, Zipp, is illustrated by your own analogy. If someone doesn't like a particular President, in your example, you seem to suggest that it is still only prudent to hope for a good economy, good military responses, etc under that President because the success of the country is the most important thing. Yet you openly revel in Tyra's one "failure" so far (not landing Brohm, which he rectified by landing Satterfield), and you openly blame only him for the current financial problems faced by the athletic department (when he inherited a number of those problems), and you seem to push for some sort of return of the previous AD, all of which suggests your motivation is simply to boast about the prior regime and not move forward. I guess only time will tell, but I think Tyra has done a good job under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.
The vast majority of your posts I skip - you chose to try and call me out in this particular one and so I responded to correct your misconception on that particular topic.Speaking of news flashes, you're getting them anyway. I thought you weren't clicking on my posts(?) Try the 'ignore' feature...
I must have missed this post. I’m not sure why Mark would come back, or if he’s really any different from Nick Petrino WRT experience and level of competence. What can he do without daddy? I would definitely like to see TJ honored publicly, and maybe leveraged as a senior advisor or consultant, perhaps through the Jurich Group (I wonder if they really have any clients). That part can be done quietly so as not to further embarrass the university or Vince NQ.If there's a Jurich to consider re-hiring, it's MARK Jurich.
Perhaps I wasn’t clear enough… I wasn’t trying to recount whatever list you may have of Tyra’s “failures”, instead what I mentioned is simply my list. And again, I think his only real failure up to this point is not landing Brohm, which he seems to have mitigated if not erased by hiring Satterfield.I appreciate your tracking of what I want and don't want to see, but your understanding in just about each instance is somewhat off...
I don't believe "Vince" has had just one misstep, nor do I think the biggest one was not landing Brohm. Jeff was certainly a setback from the standpoint of how "Vince" mismanaged his recruitment and communications. But I'm not sure that Satterfield isn't a better coach. Yes, fan support would have been greatest with Brohm, but in the end, coaching is what matters most.
I'm not going into all of my issues with the new AD another time. Just pointing out that his greatest shortcoming continues to be his inability to attract money, either thru fans or donors. That is far and away his biggest "failure" thus far. Sure, he can recover, but my belief is he doesn't even recognize that as a shortcoming. His words certainly don't show any sense of urgency. And I continue to remind people that "Vince" didn't take the job with a gun to his head. If he inherited problems as you say, that also doesn't matter in the end. They're still his problems to fix. He doesn't get a pass as AD because he inherited them which I don't fully agree with anyway.
As far as a "return of the previous AD", I'm guessing that's just a misunderstanding because I never said that. U of L could ask me to recruit Jurich back, and he still wouldn't take the job. What U of L should do is recruit Jurich for his SUPPORT, not employment. And that's not just because it's the right thing to do; it's because Jurich is linked to money in this community and will be for awhile. If there's a Jurich to consider re-hiring, it's MARK Jurich. I've outlined before my idea for how this could play out. Again, it's about money that "Vince" ain't getting otherwise.
My motivation is for U of L athletics to continue to prosper. I'd like for money to continue rolling in. I'd even like to find out that Jurich wasn't so special like most of us think/thought, that a guy like "Vince" can do the job as well. But I'm not simply giving him my money to make that happen, anymore than I give money to a financial planner who mismanages it. People earn what they get, and "Vince" has to earn his. At the moment, he's evidently not...
My memory is intact on your first and only personal encounter with me...The vast majority of your posts I skip - you chose to try and call me out in this particular one and so I responded to correct your misconception on that particular topic.
A nobody called "The New York Nets"...I must have missed this post. I’m not sure why Mark would come back, or if he’s really any different from Nick Petrino WRT experience and level of competence. What can he do without daddy? I would definitely like to see TJ honored publicly, and maybe leveraged as a senior advisor or consultant, perhaps through the Jurich Group (I wonder if they really have any clients). That part can be done quietly so as not to further embarrass the university or Vince NQ.
CBP just wasn’t a likeable guy. That always makes it worse. Probably not fair, but people naturally cut someone they like a little slack.
All you say is mostly correct but the fact that he “quit” after the soul crushing loss to FSU is on him, period. That loss was on him and spelled his doom . . . and ours. And we also know that he did, in fact, suck with the local coaches and high schools. His arrogance was beyond comprehension.
GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!! God Bless America!!!
Pretty sure the local recruiting stuff is a non-issue .... Everybody who follows local recruiting knows that Louisville and the state of Kentucky produces inferior football talent in terms of quantity to other areas of the country, especially the Deep South. And everybody also knows that in college football, quantity is essential to fielding a nationally competitive team at the P5 level.
Petrino simply did what every other successful UofL coach since Schnellenberger has done, which is focus on recruiting the Deep South, and picking and choosing the local recruits very carefully, while attempting to get as many local recruits as possible to walk on to the program.
The problem with this approach is that by using it the coach at UofL is not going to be very popular with the large majority of local recruits and by extension their coaches, who are trying to get their players scholarships. Every marginal recruit in the local area is going to feel insulted that UofL didn’t offer, and those local coaches and players who disagreed with the UofL coach’s talent evaluation end up holding a grudge because of the perceived slight.
After several years using this strategy, you are going to create a lot of grudges by slighting a lot of local players and coaches, and it’s only great success at winning football games and championships which allows the UofL coaches to overcome that negative word of mouth. And as we all know, this past year we did not have any winning at all to overcome it.
All of that to say that the only reason the local recruiting is an issue is because Petrino went 2-8 in 2018.
Pretty sure the local recruiting stuff is a non-issue .... Everybody who follows local recruiting knows that Louisville and the state of Kentucky produces inferior football talent in terms of quantity to other areas of the country, especially the Deep South. And everybody also knows that in college football, quantity is essential to fielding a nationally competitive team at the P5 level.
Petrino simply did what every other successful UofL coach since Schnellenberger has done, which is focus on recruiting the Deep South, and picking and choosing the local recruits very carefully, while attempting to get as many local recruits as possible to walk on to the program.
The problem with this approach is that by using it the coach at UofL is not going to be very popular with the large majority of local recruits and by extension their coaches, who are trying to get their players scholarships. Every marginal recruit in the local area is going to feel insulted that UofL didn’t offer, and those local coaches and players who disagreed with the UofL coach’s talent evaluation end up holding a grudge because of the perceived slight.
After several years using this strategy, you are going to create a lot of grudges by slighting a lot of local players and coaches, and it’s only great success at winning football games and championships which allows the UofL coaches to overcome that negative word of mouth. And as we all know, this past year we did not have any winning at all to overcome it.
All of that to say that the only reason the local recruiting is an issue is because Petrino went 2-8 in 2018.
Most long snappers are walk on, as are most of the local players on the roster.I'm not defending Petrino, but there are 23 Louisville kids from 12 different local high schools on the roster. Did they sneak on to the team, or were they recruited? Furthermore, the recruiting classes BP brought in were historically good for Louisville. The last five classes were ranked 31st, 29th, 36th, 32nd, and 40th, Bobby's first year back. To put that into perspective, Charlie's classes were ranked, from last to first, 52nd, 42nd, 29th, and 48th. So, Petrino isn't fully leaving the cupboard bare. Where he failed, however, was that he ignored certain positions and over recruited others. There are just 8 defensive linemen on the roster. Only 7 at DE. Meanwhile, we've got 5 long snappers. FIVE! How the recruiting class was shaping up this year, I honestly believe Petrino intentionally bombed. After Jurich was gone, he lost his strongest supporter. His dad then passed. He basically said "f*** it, I've got 14M dollars to fall back on." On field performance and recruiting suffered as a result.
Vince backed up the Gold truck that was loaded by Jurich.LOL... "Vince" backed up the gold truck.
And to be clear, I'm a "fan" of just about anyone who makes him look bad. I'm not picky...
A gig with the New York Nets? That's too bad, since they ended in about 2012. Would be better to latch on with the Brooklyn Nets.A nobody called "The New York Nets"...
Why would you close that door? When recruiting out of state you are on a level playing field with other schools when recruiting a local kid you have a leg up on the competition. If we was a Clemson or Alabama I could see it where you are going to have your pick pretty much anywhere you go but unfortunately we’re not.
Not an NBA guy. Whichever NY team the Jurich Group was claiming to be "proud partners" with scrolling across the Barclays Center floor a few weeks ago. Like I said, "nobody"...A gig with the New York Nets? That's too bad, since they ended in about 2012. Would be better to latch on with the Brooklyn Nets.
Jurich got other people to put gold on that truck. "Vince" hasn't figured out who those people are, so he puts his own. Or I should sat YOURS...Vince backed up the Gold truck that was loaded by Jurich.