I might be slightly confused as to what your board policies are then. I recall being banned after a back and forth with you, which you engaged in just as extensively as I did, yet you did not get banned. That leads me to believe that I was probably banned for being a UK fan, more-so than breaking any rules, otherwise, you would have been banned as well.
Not farfetched to think that's the case. I was banned from the UNC*** boards after offering my shoulder for them to cry on in consolation for the charges that the NCAA offered up recently.
So, all in all, you may consider my "other face" to be bad, but in all actuality, it's about the same as yours in general. A lot of venom, topped off with insulting somebody's intelligence and the occasional backhanded compliment (how very seldom that makes an appearance).
But is that me being two-faced, or is it simply me having the ability to behave myself when I need to, whereas, you do not? People have something negative to say about a lot of people every once in a while, that's just human nature. It's two-faced if you don't own it.
I'll commend you on this much, Zipp. You don't seem to have that second face that you speak so much about. You're pretty one dimensional. When you speak, everybody expects the typical "LPT" or "Slapd!ck" comments (albeit, it appears that some of your fellow posters are indifferent towards it, and some discourage it) in nearly every post. So thank you for sharing your one and only face with us. It's been such a pleasure.
As for me, as much as I applaud you for "being real" or "keeping it 100", I'm going to stick with my two-faced personality, and just view it as being capable of having a nice conversation with people who I share opposing views from. It would be a dull world if everybody agreed on everything, after all.
Not farfetched to think that's the case. I was banned from the UNC*** boards after offering my shoulder for them to cry on in consolation for the charges that the NCAA offered up recently.
So, all in all, you may consider my "other face" to be bad, but in all actuality, it's about the same as yours in general. A lot of venom, topped off with insulting somebody's intelligence and the occasional backhanded compliment (how very seldom that makes an appearance).
But is that me being two-faced, or is it simply me having the ability to behave myself when I need to, whereas, you do not? People have something negative to say about a lot of people every once in a while, that's just human nature. It's two-faced if you don't own it.
I'll commend you on this much, Zipp. You don't seem to have that second face that you speak so much about. You're pretty one dimensional. When you speak, everybody expects the typical "LPT" or "Slapd!ck" comments (albeit, it appears that some of your fellow posters are indifferent towards it, and some discourage it) in nearly every post. So thank you for sharing your one and only face with us. It's been such a pleasure.
As for me, as much as I applaud you for "being real" or "keeping it 100", I'm going to stick with my two-faced personality, and just view it as being capable of having a nice conversation with people who I share opposing views from. It would be a dull world if everybody agreed on everything, after all.
