What is the point of this thread, exactly? Are you rationalizing the fact that UK has commitments from the three best in state players in the 2016 class? Are you suggesting somehow that missing on top in state talent is preferable to landing it?Ding, Ding, Ding leave it to Zipp to make my point. Kids from the sticks will always go to Lexington to make a difference. It's sad they are so brainwashed by their communities to actually make the choice that would be better for their careers.
Having grown up in Louisville, I agree that players in the city have done some great things. Brohm, Bush, Parker come to mind. There are others. Marcus (?) Green from Male played DT at Ohio St, Montrell Jones was can't miss until he couldn't stop smoking weed at UT, etc.
That being said, Couch did OK as the overall #1 draft pick. Lorenzen has a Super Bowl ring. So to answer your initial question, yes, I do think UK needs to keep the best in state players home to compete in the SEC, though it's not a direct cause and effect (winning begets recruiting begets winning...)