ADVERTISEMENT

If you're really unhappy about our 2-4 start and want someone to blame...

Zipp, Sagarin has us now at #12. I hope you knew that the 2nd toughest schedule was a dynamic stat and subject to change. What are you hanging your hat on now. That we beat the #1 defense in the country. Me thinks that will change too.
That wasn't my point. I know BC has a good defense. What I am referring to is Zipp's response for everything has been we have the #2 rated schedule as an excuse of why we were 2-4. My point is yes, we can hang our hat on it for the 1st part of the schedule but it is not the whole story. Is Auburn the No. 6 team in the country as they were ranked early in the season or are they closer to the team that is near or at the dweller in the SEC west.
Yeah, Boston College has slipped all the way to the #2 defense in the country. And it can be easily argued that the reason they slipped from #1 is because they played the U of L offense. That's the only thing that changed in the last week.

Auburn is being incorporated into our SOS based on where they are now, not based on the possibility that they were being overrated coming into the season. I don't think the calculation works the way you're alleging.

I fully expect our SOS to decline as the season finishes. And while that happens, our win total increases, and our offensive and defensive stats improve. That happened on Saturday just with the completion of one game, Boston College.

We'll see where things shake out as the schedule softens. If you're whining about the offense or defense, you may not get much help for your arguments...
 
Zipp,

That RPI SOS is a little misleading. Doesn't count FCS schools and we have only beaten the next highest (lowest ranking) team NC State by 7 points. Also that service you quote predicts us to lose to Pittsburgh and UK predicting us to go 6-6. The ESPN football power index has us with the 68th remaining strength of schedule which is a better indication of what's left. Realistically I thought we would be 3-3 now, hoped for 4-2, fantasized about 5-1.
Petrino lose to UK - never!
 
There is no limit for blame or credit. I don't think in a sport where so many people play, with so many coaches, and so many different units, that we can just point to one thing and say, "That's the problem!"

There are a number of different people that can take responsibility for the 2-4 start. Just like there were a number of people that deserved some credit for our 9 wins last year.
 
Last edited:
Final thought on this. Going 3-3 would confirm that we had a tough early schedule. Going 2-4 indicates that we under performed in some facet or another.
 
Haha. I often said that about a lot of your posts. It seems that you feel that the more numbers and sometimes simply just more stuff that you throw out makes you the most knowledgeable poster here. I think you were the one that coined it best, sometimes you see only what you want to see." The only thing is you try to make everyone see it your way or it is the wrong way. I might have more respect for you if your posts weren't always so one sided and you're always so quick to tell someone they are wrong if they don't always agree with you 100%.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BPGhost
Haha. I often said that about a lot of your posts. It seems that you feel that the more numbers and sometimes simply just more stuff that you throw out makes you the most knowledgeable poster here. I think you were the one that coined it best, sometimes you see only what you want to see." The only thing is you try to make everyone see it your way or it is the wrong way. I might have more respect for you if your posts weren't always so one sided and you're always so quick to tell someone they are wrong if they don't always agree with you 100%.
I think that's why they created the "ignore" button. Try it and stop whining about me...
 
I would if you didn't stick your nose in everything. I like to read what other posters have to say...
Admit it, I'm like a bad car accident... You know you should drive by and not look, but you can't help yourself.

BTW if you're going to quote me--"see what you want to see"--consider the entire body of work. Esp. timeless zipp-ism no. 116: Being right often means being alone... Not that that fully applies here, with ajg and others on the same side of the debate...
 
There's only one word that's important in your post.. The word is debate. Not everyone on here wants to get in a debate with zippy. Sometimes we want just to be able to discuss anything U of L but you just want to prove something, maybe to yourself how smart you think you are but what it comes down if one poster said the sky was blue you would come up with some meaningless stats to say it was green. If that doesn't fly then it is UK sucks and zippy is popular again.
 
There's only one word that's important in your post.. The word is debate. Not everyone on here wants to get in a debate with zippy. Sometimes we want just to be able to discuss anything U of L but you just want to prove something, maybe to yourself how smart you think you are but what it comes down if one poster said the sky was blue you would come up with some meaningless stats to say it was green. If that doesn't fly then it is UK sucks and zippy is popular again.
Simplistic, superficial conclusions generally proffered by someone on the losing end of a debate...
 
Well let's look at your remaining schedule. BC, at Wake, Syracuse and Virginia are all games Louisville SHOULD win. Still have to play the games. At Pitt and at Kentucky are winnable but toss ups in my opinion because they are both on the road. But the Pitt and Kentucky games are at the end of the season when you'd figure that your YOUTH has had a chance to develop more.

I always like you post schmidty.......:)
 
With Pitt looking as bad as they did tonight we will probably be favored in our remaining games. If that runs true to form we finish 8-4. Translate an 8-4 finish with our youngsters this season to 2016 an 2017. I like where we are heading !
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockycard
Zipp, haven't you stated several times in the past that Petrino could win games with YOU as the QB? I don't remember you adding that schedule caveat then. :)
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT