I don't want it bankrupt...
UofL athletics is going to be fine and very solvent.
I don't want it bankrupt...
That's not where we're headed. Down $40 million in Year Two A.J. (After Jurich)...UofL athletics is going to be fine and very solvent.
That's not where we're headed. Down $40 million in Year Two A.J. (After Jurich)...
That's an excuse. These clowns in charge are paid to run things now and run them well...Run a clean program and that doesn’t happen. Donors will return once they are confident in the integrity of the programs they are donating to.
That's an excuse. These clowns in charge are paid to run things now and run them well...
Time's up. No one's giving U of L a break because they think the clowns inherited a bad situation. They're in this mess on their own and largely of their own doing...It’s a pretty good excuse. Not sure what the exact timeframe to turn things around is, but it ain’t yet. Keep up your great works of fiction though and keep “bagging those likes”!!!
Time's up. No one's giving U of L a break because they think the clowns inherited a bad situation. They're in this mess on their own and largely of their own doing...
I don't want it bankrupt...We are all proud of Tyra’s efforts to get UofL back to where we all want it...
I said "they THINK the clowns inherited..."The only true thing you wrote is that they “inherited a bad situation “.
I want U of L to be successful. I couldn't care less about "Vince". They're two separate entities thankfully.No you don’t want him to succeed. You would rather be right than for Vince and UofL to be successful.
Mack knows he's implicated for taking adidas money. Yeah, that's squeaky clean alright...
Yet another fan card check.WTF is wrong with you? Bad mouthing our new coach. If you're NOT a UofL fan then get off this damn board!!!
Zipp, you have to understand that your Card loyalty will continue to be questioned as long as you remain constantly such a glass half empty guy. Fans can question their coaches, their AD, their BOT but still be very supportive of their team/school. But if you are constantly and consistently a negative Nellie towards your program it’s hard to consider you a true fan.Yet another fan card check.
I'll see you at Chris Mack's radio show tonite, S&SC, 7 pm...
I appreciate the perspective, I really do. But there are many people on one side of the boat here and an even larger number who are silent passengers. If one or two guys wanna sit on the OTHER side, that should be OK without the clown show apologists wanting to form a lynch mob.Zipp, you have to understand that your Card loyalty will continue to be questioned as long as you remain constantly such a glass half empty guy. Fans can question their coaches, their AD, their BOT but still be very supportive of their team/school. But if you are constantly and consistently a negative Nellie towards your program it’s hard to consider you a true fan.
Hey Zipp - could you climb down off of the cross? We need the wood.Being right often means being alone.
Mack had nothing to do with taking adidas money. But he sure as hell benefits from it.Hey Zipp - could you climb down off of the cross? We need the wood.
Looking forward to hearing you ask CCM about why he decided to become dirty and take the adidas money at his show...
There is plenty of room for opposing viewpoints on this board and I think they should be welcomed without the poster being personally attacked. I really hate when two fans of any program start savaging each other. But, that was not the point of my post. My point was that fans, regardless of their viewpoint about specific issues, still love and support their program. They don’t root against their team, they do not wish misfortune on their team and they don’t constantly harp on reasons why their team is doomed to failure. I think you see yourself as someone who brings logic and fact-based viewpoints to the discussion and that is all well and good. But, when that logic and those facts are repeatedly presented to the exclusion of any perceived good will.... well it can become tiresome and seen as rooting against your program. If you’re feeling lonely because you are always right, maybe you should seek ways to support your team and program without being on the offensive against them so often. Peace.I appreciate the perspective, I really do. But there are many people on one side of the boat here and an even larger number who are silent passengers. If one or two guys wanna sit on the OTHER side, that should be OK without the clown show apologists wanting to form a lynch mob.
Hell, there should be appreciation for opposing POVs if yours is planted in bedrock. Be confident in your position if you have a lotta friends there. That ain't what motivates me... Being right often means being alone.
Mack had nothing to do with taking adidas money. But he sure as hell benefits from it.
And some days, this place is my 'cross'...
"He" is a reference to VJ King...zipp said: ↑
Mack knows he's implicated for taking adidas money. Yeah, that's squeaky clean alright...
I appreciate the perspective, I really do. But there are many people on one side of the boat here and an even larger number who are silent passengers. If one or two guys wanna sit on the OTHER side, that should be OK without the clown show apologists wanting to form a lynch mob.Zipp, you have to understand that your Card loyalty will continue to be questioned as long as you remain constantly such a glass half empty guy. Fans can question their coaches, their AD, their BOT but still be very supportive of their team/school. But if you are constantly and consistently a negative Nellie towards your program it’s hard to consider you a true fan.
Hell, there should be appreciation for opposing POVs if yours is planted in bedrock. Be confident in your position if you have a lotta friends there. That ain't what motivates me... Being right often means being alone.
Understood. But your point is that CCM is now complicit after the fact by playing King - correct?"He" is a reference to VJ King...
Mack is playing King knowing that he's been implicated in the FBI evidence...Understood. But your point is that CCM is now complicit after the fact by playing King - correct?
Sorry, you probably wrote this mostly for me, but I stopped reading at this point. You either don't know me or you're intentionally mis-characterizing me, i.e., "every single part".Many people on this board have opposing POV, different opinions, but only you are negative about every single part of the University...
Sorry, you probably wrote this mostly for me, but I stopped reading at this point. You either don't know me or you're intentionally mis-characterizing me, i.e., "every single part".Many people on this board have opposing POV, different opinions, but only you are negative about every single part of the University...
Try again, and I promise to read it as long as it's not bull$hit...
Pro franchises are very different from college sports. However, even there winning brings dollars. The most valuable pro football franchises are Dallas and New England. Also among the winningest. New York, Chicago, LA, Philadelphia and Houston are all much bigger markets, but have lower values, and generally win less. Green Bay, Wisconsin is the smallest by far, but is the proud owner of more NFL titles than anyone, and is more valuable than over half the NFL franchises. I believe it is you who have cause and effect backwards, even as you take the debate into pro sports, which was not the original topic.So why are large-market pro franchises consistently more successful than smaller markets? Exceptions happen in a given year and sport, but they're never sustained.
You have the cause-and-effect backward...