It's simply an opinion-driven debate over whether he should have been hired or extended. No way to settle that objectively.Almost all of the posts have concerned the buyout, the extension and the original rehire. To think that Bobby was going to be paid by anybody is problematic. To think he should be extended prematurely is highly questionable. History shows that extension didn’t buy Bobby’s loyalty. He left for the Falcons months after getting a huge extension from UofL.
The omission of offset language in his buyout OTOH has been resolved. "Vince" would have saved 3% of his buyout had that offset been in place..