ADVERTISEMENT

Analysis of ULAA Net Position...

the artist FKA zipp

4500+
Gold Member
May 29, 2022
4,566
1,757
26
The ULAA balance sheet presents four components of net position that each tell their own story. The following descriptions are taken directly from the 2023 Annual Report for the components of net position…
  1. Net investment in capital assets primarily represents capital assets and right-to-use assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization and reduced by the outstanding balances of borrowings used to finance the purchase or construction of those assets.
  2. Restricted nonexpendable net position consists of endowment gifts with specific restrictions. These endowments were made by donors to support scholarship expenses.
  3. Restricted expendable net position consists of noncapital assets that must be used for a particular purpose as specified by creditors, granters or donors external to the Association. The Association’s most significant as specified by creditors, granters or donors external to the Association. The Association’s most significant gifts with donor stipulations.
  4. Unrestricted net position represents those balances from operational activities that have not been restricted by parties external to the Association, such as donors. Although unrestricted net position is not subject to externally imposed stipulations, substantially all of the Association’s unrestricted net position has been designated for various sport, academic programs, or capital projects.
Here's our numbers broken down by category for the last decade...

Categories-of-ULAA-Net-Position.jpg

We talk a lot about the far right column--the total--but it helps to know where ULAA's equity is and is not.

The "nonexpendable" column is small and relatively constant. My understanding is that $2 million or so is the principal part of ULAA's endowments. We get to spend the interest from those funds for specific purposes, but the principal remains mostly intact. Presumably as income accrues, it becomes expendable and no longer shows up as a balance in this category. So far all intents and purposes, this small amount of money is permanently unavailable to meet ULAA's cash needs.

The remaining categories hold assets that ARE available; the biggest issue is liquidity.

The first column is most of ULAA's equity that's positive, but it's entirely fixed assets that would have to be liquidated for cash. Large assets like the golf course and the football stadium. as well as small stuff like vehicles and equipment. These assets are typically shown at book value, their original cost less depreciation. My opinion is their value in total is overstated on this basis, primarily because the largest one--the football stadium--is not of great value to anyone but U of L. If U of L no longer needed it for football, the structures would have limited or no value. The underlying land which represented an environmental issue 30 years ago is where most of the value is assuming the environmental stuff doesn't "resurface." A couple hundred acres of development land east of Louisville currently occupied by the golf course obviously has value.

The "expendable" and "unrestricted" columns are where U of L would ordinarily go for available cash. And combined, they had -$22.5 million equity as of June 30, 2023. That is how much more in liabilities we have against liquid assets than the value of the assets themselves. In essence, we've emptied the cash piggybank and gone way beyond that point. The only way this huge negative balance can be explained is as money owed back to the University. It's also important to note that ULAA is keeping track of it. In other words, the University hasn't simply given that money to athletics, at least not yet.

So, ULAA is not bankrupt, but it's extremely illiquid. There is no available cash for anything large and unforeseen. It's pretty clear we're not doing much in the way of capital projects or building anything, nor should we. We can't afford it. And while U of L shows "gifts" on its income statement, any money of consequence that comes ULAA's way for a specific purpose is apparently accounted for as more debt, and not as a gift.

If anyone else has a different take, I'm interested in hearing it...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan__of__Swine
Very insightful for those of us who know there are serious financial limitations and issues at UL, but most like myself, quit providing any financial support after witnessing the self-destructive decisions that were clearly beyond our control. Like so many, I did nothing to try and stop the foolishness, as I could see those inside the University, joining those outsiders in Frankfort, who were intent on dismantling UL leadership.

Once the BOT appointments became increasingly influenced by Frankfort, the CJ Editorial Board was able to use its own pressure by forcing Dr Ramsey out as President; in hindsight, these consequences were predictable.
 
The ULAA balance sheet presents four components of net position that each tell their own story. The following descriptions are taken directly from the 2023 Annual Report for the components of net position…
  1. Net investment in capital assets primarily represents capital assets and right-to-use assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization and reduced by the outstanding balances of borrowings used to finance the purchase or construction of those assets.
  2. Restricted nonexpendable net position consists of endowment gifts with specific restrictions. These endowments were made by donors to support scholarship expenses.
  3. Restricted expendable net position consists of noncapital assets that must be used for a particular purpose as specified by creditors, granters or donors external to the Association. The Association’s most significant as specified by creditors, granters or donors external to the Association. The Association’s most significant gifts with donor stipulations.
  4. Unrestricted net position represents those balances from operational activities that have not been restricted by parties external to the Association, such as donors. Although unrestricted net position is not subject to externally imposed stipulations, substantially all of the Association’s unrestricted net position has been designated for various sport, academic programs, or capital projects.
Here's our numbers broken down by category for the last decade...

Categories-of-ULAA-Net-Position.jpg

We talk a lot about the far right column--the total--but it helps to know where ULAA's equity is and is not.

The "nonexpendable" column is small and relatively constant. My understanding is that $2 million or so is the principal part of ULAA's endowments. We get to spend the interest from those funds for specific purposes, but the principal remains mostly intact. Presumably as income accrues, it becomes expendable and no longer shows up as a balance in this category. So far all intents and purposes, this small amount of money is permanently unavailable to meet ULAA's cash needs.

The remaining categories hold assets that ARE available; the biggest issue is liquidity.

The first column is most of ULAA's equity that's positive, but it's entirely fixed assets that would have to be liquidated for cash. Large assets like the golf course and the football stadium. as well as small stuff like vehicles and equipment. These assets are typically shown at book value, their original cost less depreciation. My opinion is their value in total is overstated on this basis, primarily because the largest one--the football stadium--is not of great value to anyone but U of L. If U of L no longer needed it for football, the structures would have limited or no value. The underlying land which represented an environmental issue 30 years ago is where most of the value is assuming the environmental stuff doesn't "resurface." A couple hundred acres of development land east of Louisville currently occupied by the golf course obviously has value.

The "expendable" and "unrestricted" columns are where U of L would ordinarily go for available cash. And combined, they had -$22.5 million equity as of June 30, 2023. That is how much more in liabilities we have against liquid assets than the value of the assets themselves. In essence, we've emptied the cash piggybank and gone way beyond that point. The only way this huge negative balance can be explained is as money owed back to the University. It's also important to note that ULAA is keeping track of it. In other words, the University hasn't simply given that money to athletics, at least not yet.

So, ULAA is not bankrupt, but it's extremely illiquid. There is no available cash for anything large and unforeseen. It's pretty clear we're not doing much in the way of capital projects or building anything, nor should we. We can't afford it. And while U of L shows "gifts" on its income statement, any money of consequence that comes ULAA's way for a specific purpose is apparently accounted for as more debt, and not as a gift.

If anyone else has a different take, I'm interested in hearing it...
I think your analysis is correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the artist FKA zipp
Very insightful for those of us who know there are serious financial limitations and issues at UL, but most like myself, quit providing any financial support after witnessing the self-destructive decisions that were clearly beyond our control. Like so many, I did nothing to try and stop the foolishness, as I could see those inside the University, joining those outsiders in Frankfort, who were intent on dismantling UL leadership.

Once the BOT appointments became increasingly influenced by Frankfort, the CJ Editorial Board was able to use its own pressure by forcing Dr Ramsey out as President; in hindsight, these consequences were predictable.
Exactly!!!
 
The ULAA balance sheet presents four components of net position that each tell their own story. The following descriptions are taken directly from the 2023 Annual Report for the components of net position…
  1. Net investment in capital assets primarily represents capital assets and right-to-use assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization and reduced by the outstanding balances of borrowings used to finance the purchase or construction of those assets.
  2. Restricted nonexpendable net position consists of endowment gifts with specific restrictions. These endowments were made by donors to support scholarship expenses.
  3. Restricted expendable net position consists of noncapital assets that must be used for a particular purpose as specified by creditors, granters or donors external to the Association. The Association’s most significant as specified by creditors, granters or donors external to the Association. The Association’s most significant gifts with donor stipulations.
  4. Unrestricted net position represents those balances from operational activities that have not been restricted by parties external to the Association, such as donors. Although unrestricted net position is not subject to externally imposed stipulations, substantially all of the Association’s unrestricted net position has been designated for various sport, academic programs, or capital projects.
Here's our numbers broken down by category for the last decade...

Categories-of-ULAA-Net-Position.jpg

We talk a lot about the far right column--the total--but it helps to know where ULAA's equity is and is not.

The "nonexpendable" column is small and relatively constant. My understanding is that $2 million or so is the principal part of ULAA's endowments. We get to spend the interest from those funds for specific purposes, but the principal remains mostly intact. Presumably as income accrues, it becomes expendable and no longer shows up as a balance in this category. So far all intents and purposes, this small amount of money is permanently unavailable to meet ULAA's cash needs.

The remaining categories hold assets that ARE available; the biggest issue is liquidity.

The first column is most of ULAA's equity that's positive, but it's entirely fixed assets that would have to be liquidated for cash. Large assets like the golf course and the football stadium. as well as small stuff like vehicles and equipment. These assets are typically shown at book value, their original cost less depreciation. My opinion is their value in total is overstated on this basis, primarily because the largest one--the football stadium--is not of great value to anyone but U of L. If U of L no longer needed it for football, the structures would have limited or no value. The underlying land which represented an environmental issue 30 years ago is where most of the value is assuming the environmental stuff doesn't "resurface." A couple hundred acres of development land east of Louisville currently occupied by the golf course obviously has value.

The "expendable" and "unrestricted" columns are where U of L would ordinarily go for available cash. And combined, they had -$22.5 million equity as of June 30, 2023. That is how much more in liabilities we have against liquid assets than the value of the assets themselves. In essence, we've emptied the cash piggybank and gone way beyond that point. The only way this huge negative balance can be explained is as money owed back to the University. It's also important to note that ULAA is keeping track of it. In other words, the University hasn't simply given that money to athletics, at least not yet.

So, ULAA is not bankrupt, but it's extremely illiquid. There is no available cash for anything large and unforeseen. It's pretty clear we're not doing much in the way of capital projects or building anything, nor should we. We can't afford it. And while U of L shows "gifts" on its income statement, any money of consequence that comes ULAA's way for a specific purpose is apparently accounted for as more debt, and not as a gift.

If anyone else has a different take, I'm interested in hearing it...
C'mon, you couldn't make that into a graph?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BPGhost
Not that it is a major issue in this discussion, but the residual environmental contamination beneath the stadium complex is no longer an issue due to a change in the way that the Kentucky Division of Waste Management views environmental risk. The days of forcing cleanup of sites in this situation have been replaced with environmental restrictive covenants and risk exposure mitigation. The stadium and parking lots are acting as engineering controls, with vapors now being the primary concern since it is not located in a sensitive groundwater zone. Any redevelopment of the site would only likely require vapor barriers and sub-slab vapor depressurization systems to be installed in any occupied structures. Neither mitigative methods are particularly expensive to implement in new construction.
 
Good to know on the environmental. I didn’t wanna assume that regs and laws from three decades ago were no more stringent in 2024.

Did some rough estimating on the property value for the stadium property and the golf course. Appears that comparable property is in the range of $100K per acre. If anyone in the biz can improve on that number, speak up.

Turns out that both sites are around 200 acres each. That’s $40 million in value excl. the cost of clearing the stadium, field house, etc. Property along the west side of the interstate where the track & field, softball and field hockey stadiums, and tennis center are situated have value. Another $20 million?

Still half of what we show net capital assets on the balance sheet…
 
Good to know on the environmental. I didn’t wanna assume that regs and laws from three decades ago were no more stringent in 2024.

Did some rough estimating on the property value for the stadium property and the golf course. Appears that comparable property is in the range of $100K per acre. If anyone in the biz can improve on that number, speak up.

Turns out that both sites are around 200 acres each. That’s $40 million in value excl. the cost of clearing the stadium, field house, etc. Property along the west side of the interstate where the track & field, softball and field hockey stadiums, and tennis center are situated have value. Another $20 million?

Still half of what we show net capital assets on the balance sheet…
Best comparison would be the former Kentucky Trailer site that my understanding also had some environmental issues. Kentucky is better than many states when it comes to brownfield redevelopment. They take a more pragmatic that focuses on exposure risk and prioritizing sensitive sites instead wasting millions on cleanup of sites with minimal exposure risk to human health and the environment.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT