ADVERTISEMENT

We give Jeff another year. That’s all.

CardX

Five-Star Poster
May 29, 2001
23,585
5,150
26
502
How long has that MFer been a HC? Does he feel so safe in his job security that he can coach like that, his team plays like that, and there are no consequences? This isn’t the first time, either. Though, today was particularly the worst. Maybe I’ll cool off tomorrow, but that was epically, historically, bad. Very bad. God awful. No ****ing excuse for that.

He needs to win out or there will be a revolt, I don’t care what his last name is. Total crap.
 
Honestly one of the worst coached games I’ve ever witnessed. Brohm needs to get his shit together. We could’ve dominated the game running it down their throats instead he decided to play cute. F’ing abomination.

Obviously Ron English needs to be fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cardiac Red
It was a textbook example on how to blow a game. I don't think I care what happens the rest of this season. Of course I want to win but so what if we don't.
 
How long has that MFer been a HC? Does he feel so safe in his job security that he can coach like that, his team plays like that, and there are no consequences? This isn’t the first time, either. Though, today was particularly the worst. Maybe I’ll cool off tomorrow, but that was epically, historically, bad. Very bad. God awful. No ****ing excuse for that.

He needs to win out or there will be a revolt, I don’t care what his last name is. Total crap.
I didn't quite get to that in the other thread but yeah,I can't believe some of the things I saw at the end,nevermind the rest of the game 😳
 
During the 4th quarter of our win at Clemson, I remarked that Brohm’s decision to go conservative and “run the clock” may be following the old textbook that was used 20 years ago. However, the game as evolved significantly and letting off the accelerator only gives the opponent a huge advantage when trying to make up a couple of TDs.

In fairness, the defensive penalties certainly gave Stanford a boost, but I believe Brohm going conservative offensively in the third and fourth quarter contributed to Stanford’s ability to come back, just as Clemson did. Running the football on 1st and 2nd down puts a lot of pressure on Shough and our receivers to complete a pass on 3rd down to sustain the series. We did that successfully several times, until we didn’t ……… giving the ball back to the opponent, who will most assuredly use all 4 downs, is just an invitation to help them have a chance to get back in the game.

I have no interest in talking about a coaching change, despite these unexpected and humiliating upsets like yesterday. Personally, I believe that Jeff needs to learn a lesson here …….. don’t let off the offensive accelerator when ahead. Shough was picking Stanford’s secondary apart, and we should have added to the 15 point advantage, rather than going conservative when trying to eat up the clock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayoman
Offensive playing calling is really based off production. Vegas implied score was 38-17 The offense produced 35 points. They didn’t produce when they really needed it.

Brown gets hurt but Watson is a stud. It really boils down to the passing game again is OK. Not awful not great.

Tyler is good but he is zero threat to run. When the other team covers he doesn’t even look to run. How many times does a running QB on 3-5 or 3-10 make a play with their legs. Those extend drives. He done that maybe once or twice all year.

Receiver depth is a problem again. They are either no scheming people open or the receivers aren’t separating.

Line wasn’t the problem.

The defense is the problem. The offense isn’t good enough to cover for it. Not sure how anyone can watch that Stanford offense that can’t run the ball and a QB that was been a turnover machine say Louisville’s play calling was the issue. Our defense had to scheme up 2 guys to defend and the staff/players couldn’t do it. Again Riley a NFL corner, supposedly, was torched.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayoman
Offensive playing calling is really based off production. Vegas implied score was 38-17 The offense produced 35 points. They didn’t produce when they really needed it.

Brown gets hurt but Watson is a stud. It really boils down to the passing game again is OK. Not awful not great.

Tyler is good but he is zero threat to run. When the other team covers he doesn’t even look to run. How many times does a running QB on 3-5 or 3-10 make a play with their legs. Those extend drives. He done that maybe once or twice all year.

Receiver depth is a problem again. They are either no scheming people open or the receivers aren’t separating.

Line wasn’t the problem.

The defense is the problem. The offense isn’t good enough to cover for it. Not sure how anyone can watch that Stanford offense that can’t run the ball and a QB that was been a turnover machine say Louisville’s play calling was the issue. Our defense had to scheme up 2 guys to defend and the staff/players couldn’t do it. Again Riley a NFL corner, supposedly, was torched.
Good post. You kind of touched on this but I think in the college game you have to have a QB that is some threat to run. When the defense has to account for the QB as a runner it opens up so much. And for the sake of everything good can Brohm stop running an option play. He ran it one time when we were methodically moving down the field and it lost yardage. An option play with a qb that can’t or won’t run is just bizarre.
 
During the 4th quarter of our win at Clemson, I remarked that Brohm’s decision to go conservative and “run the clock” may be following the old textbook that was used 20 years ago. However, the game as evolved significantly and letting off the accelerator only gives the opponent a huge advantage when trying to make up a couple of TDs.

In fairness, the defensive penalties certainly gave Stanford a boost, but I believe Brohm going conservative offensively in the third and fourth quarter contributed to Stanford’s ability to come back, just as Clemson did. Running the football on 1st and 2nd down puts a lot of pressure on Shough and our receivers to complete a pass on 3rd down to sustain the series. We did that successfully several times, until we didn’t ……… giving the ball back to the opponent, who will most assuredly use all 4 downs, is just an invitation to help them have a chance to get back in the game.

I have no interest in talking about a coaching change, despite these unexpected and humiliating upsets like yesterday. Personally, I believe that Jeff needs to learn a lesson here …….. don’t let off the offensive accelerator when ahead. Shough was picking Stanford’s secondary apart, and we should have added to the 15 point advantage, rather than going conservative when trying to eat up the clock.
Yeah, you could see the results of this BS approach in the 4th Qtr of the Clemson game. Terrible offensive strategy. Bad bad coaching.
 
He needs to win out or there will be a revolt, I don’t care what his last name is. Total crap.
Oh I think the revolt is underway already. We have a tailgate group text with around 30 people in and the they all had the pitchforks out lastnight. He can save some grace by winning out but if he doesn't and we get pounded by a weak ass ky team we will start next season with an empty stadium..
 
Oh I think the revolt is underway already. We have a tailgate group text with around 30 people in and the they all had the pitchforks out lastnight. He can save some grace by winning out but if he doesn't and we get pounded by a weak ass ky team we will start next season with an empty stadium..
Just curious who would you replace him with?

He is not going anywhere, but he is going to have to figure out his defensive philosophy.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT