![www.wdrb.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com%2Fwdrb.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2Fv3%2Feditorial%2Fe%2F64%2Fe64f59ae-0d70-11ed-b1b1-d3be35ade392%2F62e0d3dd55f14.image.jpg%3Fcrop%3D1920%252C1008%252C0%252C35%26resize%3D1200%252C630%26order%3Dcrop%252Cresize&hash=a2effe62f2eac1bd032dfb79ddfa78f2&return_error=1)
CRAWFORD | Louisville's 502Circle collective names first advisory board members
The Louisville collective has sparked much interest as it ramps up its activities.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well i by no means like any of this NIL crap. However the Genie has been let out the bottle no matter what stipulations the NCAA puts in effect too late. And if this school expects to be competitive and relevant in the major sports landscape we are going to need this. It's the new norm. Now i do expect over time for this to kinda level out . Their is no way alot of these business will think it's a profitable thing for them. Especially the kids in BB that will be one and done. But people with money to burn don't think like a regular person does.Not interested, and I'm curious what kind of reaction they get from other fans. The LAST thing I will help college athletes do is become more like pro players.
I may end up watching a team that looks like Bellarmine representing U of L. High basketball IQ and marginal athletic ability. So be it...
233 even though I "like" most of what your post indicates I must disagree with your last sentence. NO school is going drop out of a conference simply because they cannot "compete athletically" and I think that is what you are implying. Money drives the bus and that is the fact of the situation. The perfect example is Uahkay football. They, for years and years, did not compete in the SEC (along with Vandy) but the paycheck at the end of the season kept them coming back for more drubbings. We, at UofL, are actually not much different as we've taken a ton of football butt kickings for checks over the years. You always gotta figure out a way to pay the bills including high coaching costs.The best way the vast majority of student athletes will earn money is by obtaining a good education that prepares them for a job that provides career earnings. The percentage of student athletes who eventually earn a living playing professional sports is very small compared to the overall numbers.
Selfishly, I too will enjoy UL using its NIL as a way to attract the level of talent that makes us more competitive, but everything becomes relative ……. ultimately there will always be someone who is willing to out bid the other, and I do not expect UL will beat UK (just an example of a close rival) or other larger fanbases when it comes to who will pay the most.
There are going to be winners and losers, and much like before NIL, there will be the vast majority who either cannot, or will choose not to be as competitive. We are seeing some of this now with the conference realignment. Just my own speculation, but once the majority of schools recognize they cannot compete equally, the numbers of schools participating will decline significantly.
That's true in our current context. What if Vandy's share of the SEC pie declines significantly because of a new performance based, revenue sharing model which I think is coming for everyone eventually? No way Vandy deserves the same share of SEC money as schools like Bama and aTm.233 even though I "like" most of what your post indicates I must disagree with your last sentence. NO school is going drop out of a conference simply because they cannot "compete athletically" and I think that is what you are implying. Money drives the bus and that is the fact of the situation...
Under your proposal what would happen to the Vandys, Northwesterns, and Wake Forests of the world? Would they be left out? And you can add several top level schools to that list (Rutgers, Syracuse, Kansas, Stanford, etc.). This is why I don't truly believe we are headed for the two super conferences any time soon. Those type schools still yield some influence on the decision making process and as long as that is the situation it will be a loooonnnnngggg time before any major changes happen. Just my opinion here.That's true in our current context. What if Vandy's share of the SEC pie declines significantly because of a new performance based, revenue sharing model which I think is coming for everyone eventually? No way Vandy deserves the same share of SEC money as schools like Bama and aTm.
I think you're gonna see a lotta changes in the next decade that feed the big dogs and starve the small ones throughout college football. Then let's see what schools decide to do that are hopelessly mired at the bottom of their conferences...
I think the financials will eventually "leave them out" or pay them what they bring to the table financially.Under your proposal what would happen to the Vandys, Northwesterns, and Wake Forests of the world? Would they be left out?...