Just out of curiosity, why do you think the conference auto-bid should be revoked? I get that you think the conference isn't good, but do you want to take away every auto bid from every lower-tier conference?Originally posted by zipp:
Nothing inaccurate in the OP... Being down at halftime in an NCAA play-in game is embarrassing. Enough to cause America to turn the channel.
And just what I'd expect from an SEC team. They should all be in play-in games, and the conference auto-bid should be revoked.
"Elite program", my a$$...
oopsOriginally posted by zipp:
...Ole Miss down 17 points at halftime of their play-in game.
Originally posted by Atwood8665:
Just out of curiosity, why do you think the conference auto-bid should be revoked? I get that you think the conference isn't good, but do you want to take away every auto bid from every lower-tier conference?Start another thread on the subject. But in a nutshell, there should be far fewer teams invited--maybe sixteen--so most auto-bids should be eliminated. Each contest should be decided in a three- or five-game series. Legit teams will advance, no more cinderellas.
"Elite program", my a$$...
It's not important enough for a separate thread, I was just curious because I had seen you mention taking away auto bids before. And I don't disagree with your ideas, especially the three- or five-game series. It would make sure the best teams were the ones that won the tournaments, but would make less money for the TV companies and the NCAA.Originally posted by zipp:
Originally posted by Atwood8665:
Just out of curiosity, why do you think the conference auto-bid should be revoked? I get that you think the conference isn't good, but do you want to take away every auto bid from every lower-tier conference?Start another thread on the subject. But in a nutshell, there should be far fewer teams invited--maybe sixteen--so most auto-bids should be eliminated. Each contest should be decided in a three- or five-game series. Legit teams will advance, no more cinderellas.
"Elite program", my a$$...
Jimmy Valvano say "KMA"Originally posted by zipp:
Originally posted by Atwood8665:
Just out of curiosity, why do you think the conference auto-bid should be revoked? I get that you think the conference isn't good, but do you want to take away every auto bid from every lower-tier conference?Start another thread on the subject. But in a nutshell, there should be far fewer teams invited--maybe sixteen--so most auto-bids should be eliminated. Each contest should be decided in a three- or five-game series. Legit teams will advance, no more cinderellas.
"Elite program", my a$$...
Originally posted by Atwood8665:
It's not important enough for a separate thread, I was just curious because I had seen you mention taking away auto bids before. And I don't disagree with your ideas, especially the three- or five-game series. It would make sure the best teams were the ones that won the tournaments, but would make less money for the TV companies and the NCAA. That's not true. A sixteen team tourney with three-game 1st round contests, five-game 2nd rounds, and a best-of-seven final would have between 32 and 51 games total vs. 63 presently. But half of the games now overlap to where most people don't get to watch them. In fact, 75% of them (48 games) will be over by Sunday nite.
A multiple elimination format would allow games to be spread over several weeks during primetime evening and weekend time slots, and you'd get to watch a majority of them. It would be fantastic.
More importantly--as is happening in football--you get a legit national champion. Not simply the winner of a cinderella tournament like last year.
"Elite program", my a$$...
Sounds like I missed what turned out to be a good game. BYU nor Ol'e Miss interest me so I watched a NBA game last night.Originally posted by zipp:
...Ole Miss down 17 points at halftime of their play-in game.
The problem is Spring football practice has already started.
"Elite program", my a$$...
Me too, I really like Andy Kennedy.Originally posted by BooneCo_Card:
Glad to see AK and Ole Miss get the win after he got hosed at UC. I can't stand BYU. The rest of the SEZ can go pound salt.
Yeah, that perplexes me as well. It's an unfair disadvantage to be an 11 seed, then be forced to play an additional game that two other 11 seeds, no 12, no 13, no 14, no 15 and two 16 seeds don't have to play . It would make more sense to have the first 4 out play the last 4 in.Originally posted by KB55:
The thing that gets me is your in a play in game but yet your 11 seed??
It's not rocket science. The four lowest seeded conference champions are in two play-in games. The four lowest seeded at-large teams are in the other two play-in games.Originally posted by Steelers2012:
Yeah, that perplexes me as well. It's an unfair disadvantage to be an 11 seed, then be forced to play an additional game that two other 11 seeds, no 12, no 13, no 14, no 15 and two 16 seeds don't have to play . It would make more sense to have the first 4 out play the last 4 in.Originally posted by KB55:
The thing that gets me is your in a play in game but yet your 11 seed??
This post was edited on 3/18 2:45 PM by Steelers2012
I know that's how they do it, but just seems weird an 11 seed playing in the play in game. let the 8 lowest seeds play it outOriginally posted by PushupMan:
It's not rocket science. The four lowest seeded conference champions are in two play-in games. The four lowest seeded at-large teams are in the other two play-in games.Originally posted by Steelers2012:
Yeah, that perplexes me as well. It's an unfair disadvantage to be an 11 seed, then be forced to play an additional game that two other 11 seeds, no 12, no 13, no 14, no 15 and two 16 seeds don't have to play . It would make more sense to have the first 4 out play the last 4 in.Originally posted by KB55:
The thing that gets me is your in a play in game but yet your 11 seed??
This post was edited on 3/18 2:45 PM by Steelers2012
I tend to agree. An 11 seed like Dayton should not be in a play in game IMO. Seems like the lowest seed 8 teams should battle it out in the extra games as you said.Originally posted by KB55:
I know that's how they do it, but just seems weird an 11 seed playing in the play in game. let the 8 lowest seeds play it outOriginally posted by PushupMan:
It's not rocket science. The four lowest seeded conference champions are in two play-in games. The four lowest seeded at-large teams are in the other two play-in games.Originally posted by Steelers2012:
Yeah, that perplexes me as well. It's an unfair disadvantage to be an 11 seed, then be forced to play an additional game that two other 11 seeds, no 12, no 13, no 14, no 15 and two 16 seeds don't have to play . It would make more sense to have the first 4 out play the last 4 in.Originally posted by KB55:
The thing that gets me is your in a play in game but yet your 11 seed??
This post was edited on 3/18 2:45 PM by Steelers2012
Originally posted by Rockfly78:
You can throw the "power 5" thing out the window in March. Last year The SEC accounted for 50% of the Final Four and a team from the AAC or CUSA or something won the title. I'm not a fan of the current NCAA tourney format. And all your point proves is that a OAD tourney with parity among the teams delivers flukey results. Look at the two teams in the final last year: 7TH seeded UConn and 8TH seeded LPT.
But the teams INVITED and SEEDED are based on the SEASON'S RESULTS. Except for the AQs, there's nothing flukey about that.
And why would I expect a fan of the one legit SEC basketball program to discredit the validity of the P5? To the contrary, the SEC should lose its NCAA auto-bid.
"Elite program", my a$$...