Deferred comp has to be averaged over the period of deferral. Not counted in the year of distribution as agendists try to do.
And if Ramsey's compensation was excessive, the IRS would be levying excise taxes which to may knowledge hasn't happened.
So again, your info and conclusions are wrong...
I haven't backtracked on anything. Are other university presidents not receiving deferred comp? If you have better data, provide it. But I think we covered that already...you don't have data, just opinions.Not surprised you'd backtrack and skew. What alternative could you have? The deferrred comp made him an unjustifiably rich SOB and it was all set up to deceive the public, foundation employees, donors, and just about everyone else. If you are good with that then enjoy the bliss of ignorance.
Damage? The damage was ongoing when he started in the position. He helped relieve the university and community of chronic damage producers.Without knowing, I'm guessing the higher paid guy didn't do nearly as much damage. I'm also assuming there's less money to go around nowadays...
I already gave you data...you just don't like them, and you have nothing to counter with.What exactly do you have?...
And I do have an update on "contentions"... No lawsuits filed against Ramsey, no criminal charges entered, no IRS levies or audits....The contention was that he mismanaged money and that is the cause of the ongoing investigation by the AG as well as a lawsuit by U of L. You have any updates on those?
And I do have an update on "contentions"... No lawsuits filed against Ramsey, no criminal charges entered, no IRS levies or audits.
And the statute of limitations on those keep ticking by...
Just where I wanted you...on the same side as these guys. LOLWhat's great about bantering with you is just how frequently wrong and misguided you are. No need to worry about the statute of limitations now eh Zippy?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.courier-journal.com/amp/547643002
Just where I wanted you...on the same side as these guys. LOL
![]()