Why did Pinto's lawyer not mention the fact that the NCAA conclusion was based entirely on their investigation, completely disregarding the legal determination by the District Attorney and a Grand Jury there was insufficient evidence to even indict any of the parties who might committed these acts? The NCAA assumed these acts were committed based on their investigation giving little credence to any rebuttal evidence Louisville presented in their response
Where actions even arose to a violation of the law and a breaking of their regulations?
Where actions even arose to a violation of the law and a breaking of their regulations?