ADVERTISEMENT

NCAA considers moving back 3 point arc and resetting clock to 20 after shot

glassmanJ

2500+
Jan 26, 2007
2,905
1,515
26
https://collegebasketball.nbcsports...proposes-moving-threes-to-international-line/

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — The NCAA men’s basketball rules committee is proposing moving the 3-point line to the international distance and resetting the shot clock to 20 seconds following offensive rebounds.

Both rules could take effect next season in Division I. College basketball’s other two divisions would wait until 2020-21 to move the 3-point line because of the cost.

The Playing Rules Oversight Panel will vote on the recommendations June 5.

Rules committee members made their proposals after receiving feedback from the coaches who competed in the NIT each of the past two years, which used the international line on an experimental basis.

The international 3-point distance is 22 feet, 1.75 inches, a little more than a foot back from the current college line.

“Freedom of movement in the game remains important, and we feel this will open up the game,” said Colorado coach Tad Boyle, the committee’s chairman. “We believe this will remove some of the congestion on the way to the basket.”

The line moved out a foot to 20 feet, 9 inches before the 2008-09 season. The NCAA said the 3-point percentage dipped from 35.2% in 2007-08 to 34.4% in 2008-09 with that change, though it eventually climbed back to 35.2% in Division I by the 2017-18 season.

The proposal for the shot-clock change was designed to improve the pace of the game, with the NCAA stating the committee believes the full 30-second clock isn’t needed when the offensive team securing the rebound already is in the front court.

As with the current rule, the clock reset would take place only when a shot has hit the rim.

The committee also proposed:

— Assessing Flagrant 2 fouls, which include ejections, if derogatory epithets are used.

— Allowing coaches to call live-ball timeouts during the final two minutes of regulation or overtime.

— Expanding replay reviews to include basket interference or goaltending calls in the final two minutes of regulation or overtime.
 
I don't mind the 3 point shot getting moved back, and the attempt to clean up the trash talking, but the rest of that stuff I could do without especially the replay. Part of the game is the human factor plus replays just slows down the game they want to go faster.
 
Last edited:
Damn few three pointers anymore are shot with the players' toes on the line. Most of these guys look like they're trying to prove they can hit NBA threes...
 
  • Like
Reactions: glassmanJ
really no reason why ncaa doesn't adopt full international rules or at least full nba with longer shot clock. if you are training them for the next level put the same rules in at lower levels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cue Card
really no reason why ncaa doesn't adopt full international rules or at least full nba with longer shot clock. if you are training them for the next level put the same rules in at lower levels.
For the simple reason we don’t want college BB to look exactly like the NBA. Might as well go to 4 quarters like the women do...
 
I don’t want to see NBA rules in college I hate the NBA game that’s why I never watch it. Who ever gets the rebound is going to shoot the ball it doesn’t matter what end of the floor they are on,
 
Ever since the use of the 3-pt line by the ABA back in the 60’s and 70’s, I have thought that there should be a 4-pt line, too. And it’s already painted on the court: the half-court line.

Make it happen, experimental NIT rules!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CommodoreCard
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT