The Ville comes in @ #14....
http://floridastate.247sports.com/Bolt/FSU-a-top-10-team-in-Lindys-preseason-poll-45449479
http://floridastate.247sports.com/Bolt/FSU-a-top-10-team-in-Lindys-preseason-poll-45449479
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lordy, that pretty much makes the Atlantic Division of the ACC the toughest in America.The Ville comes in @ #14....
http://floridastate.247sports.com/Bolt/FSU-a-top-10-team-in-Lindys-preseason-poll-45449479
Only the SEC West is tougher...
Myself...just pointing out that both divisions have by many accounts 3 of the Top 15 teams heading into the 2016 season...the ACC Atlantic with Clemson, FSU & Louisville...the SEC West with Alabama, LSU & Ole Miss...not really going to get into the rest of the hypotheticals but will just say IMO The SEC West from schools 4 through 7 is deeper and better...it is what it is...both divisions appear to be tough at the top
Maybe I'm reading your statement wrong, but didn't PE state that the SEC west is stronger?Interesting take by you and Senore2006. But, it is off season so let me pose a question to you both (and others).
Premise: The premise of my question is you both reacted to the SEC West and ACC Atlantic having three teams in the top 14. Fair enough. In truth I think it is possible that all seven teams in the SEC West will be in someone's pre-season top 25. But, forget that for now. Let's say all agree that UL, FSU and Clemson along with Alabama, Ole Miss, and LSU are in everyone's top 14. Let's also assume for now that no other team in either division is in anyone's top 40.
Question: Let's suppose based on the premise that such is the case. Let us also suppose that the Southwestern Eastern Division of the Big 63.5 Conference has seven teams. Let's suppose that all of those teams are generally in everyone's top 35 ranked variously from 15th to 33rd. In your view, which would be the tougher division? (And as a matter of full disclosure, I don't have an answer myself. I am not really sure from which perspective I would answer it if I could.)
Maybe I'm reading your statement wrong, but didn't PE state that the SEC west is stronger?
Interesting take by you and Senore2006. But, it is off season so let me pose a question to you both (and others).
Premise: The premise of my question is you both reacted to the SEC West and ACC Atlantic having three teams in the top 14. Fair enough. In truth I think it is possible that all seven teams in the SEC West will be in someone's pre-season top 25. But, forget that for now. Let's say all agree that UL, FSU and Clemson along with Alabama, Ole Miss, and LSU are in everyone's top 14. Let's also assume for now that no other team in either division is in anyone's top 40.
Question: Let's suppose based on the premise that such is the case. Let us also suppose that the Southwestern Eastern Division of the Big 63.5 Conference has seven teams. Let's suppose that all of those teams are generally in everyone's top 35 ranked variously from 15th to 33rd. In your view, which would be the tougher division? (And as a matter of full disclosure, I don't have an answer myself. I am not really sure from which perspective I would answer it if I could.)
Maybe I'm reading your statement wrong, but didn't PE state that the SEC west is stronger?
He did. As he noted below your post. My only point is his and the OP made me think: what makes a division "tough" or even "good"? Is it three teams at the top? Or is it tougher if all the teams are about equal and all pretty good. I am not sure which is the answer.
Gotcha...myself it is overall...what makes the SEC West the toughest is the bottom 4...Mississippi State, Arkansas, Texas A&M and Auburn would be near the top of a division like the SEC East, B1G West or ACC Coastal
For pure humor value, this is a colossal post.I'm surprised that no one mentioned that the ACC Atlantic division has been bolstered by the addition of the wizarding world of Harry Potter...
That's true but on the other hand, those teams can take a loss and it won't dent their chances of making the 4 team play-off . In other leagues, 1 loss knocks you out of the running.Agreed. But, ironically, the closer the teams are, the less likely any of them makes the playoff (even if expanded). In theory, everyone in the SEC west could go 9-3 (5-3 in conference). That won't happen, but it is possible. In that scenario, even if they are the best seven teams in the country, none of them get to play for a title.[/QUOTE}
Or is it tougher if all the teams are about equal and all pretty good.
Such a scenario has never existed. If it has, point us to the year and the league. I don't think it ever has happened before. And, I don't think it ever will happen. So it's a rather pointless thing to consider.
What if something that has never happened and never will happen ends up happening.
No sale.
An interesting thinkpiece would be just which of the nine (9) P5 "divisions" is WEAKEST at their bottom! ACC Atlantic might get some votes there with Wake, BC and Syracuse.He did. As he noted below your post. My only point is his and the OP made me think: what makes a division "tough" or even "good"? Is it three teams at the top? Or is it tougher if all the teams are about equal and all pretty good. I am not sure which is the answer.
Came pretty close to that the last two years in the SEC West. .
An interesting thinkpiece would be just which of the nine (9) P5 "divisions" is WEAKEST at their bottom! ACC Atlantic might get some votes there with Wake, BC and Syracuse.
The ACC Atlantic may be the most "bi-polar" division.