I agree. And I wouldn't be disappointed to see him end up being the guy. It'll be a lot easier to sell the new coach to the fans if you can tell he really wants to be here and if he can connect with the community (and if he wins), and I think Schertz fits the bill there.Here’s my take on Schertz. It would be a huge gamble. However, of all the coaches we are looking for I think he might be the best fit for Louisville. Winning is most important of course. He runs an up tempo high octane offense. He’s a gym rat. He has a chip on his shoulder. I see him as a low floor, high ceiling guy. Not sure we can afford to gamble but I think he could win big here.
I promise the days of cradling rebounds like they're a huge chunk of gold and walking it up the court will be over. Excitement from the first tip to the end.He runs an up tempo high octane offense
It is crazy 🤪 but these are crazy times. You know the Big Dance is chocked full of guys that are going on to NBA careers but who aren't great college players and guys who won't sniff the NBA but have great success in the tournament. Give me 2-3 great shooters,a couple of blue collar guys and roll it out.but it feels crazy to me to hire a coach that has never had to recruit 4/5 star prospects at any of his stops the last 25 years.
All good points. I will say that anymore it’s the coach saying who he wants and then the collective gets to work acquiring the talent. I hate the system but that’s what it is these days.I like Josh Schertz, but it feels crazy to me to hire a coach that has never had to recruit 4/5 star prospects at any of his stops the last 25 years. At least Dusty was at Florida, Holloway at Hall, & Amir was on Power 5 staffs. Now I understand that money talks, but these players also have pro aspirations that he could only pretend to relate to.
Outside of that reaction ^^ this guy can flat out coach and if you have watched them any more than the highlights of their big white guy, they have these guards that seem like our brand of hoops. I think we could get 3-4 of their starting 5 to transfer here because they still are eligible. I'm not sure Cream would work as the starting center in the ACC, but he would be my new favorite Card.
The portal is probably more important to programs like UofL now, than the HS recruits. UofL has rarely been a factor for a T10 player out of HS, in this era. Those guys just aren't coming here unless you switch to NIKE and go all-in on that approach.
So the question is, can the next HC work the portal and mix that with just a few HS guys that he can convince to stick with him a few years and contribute.
I get what you're saying. Danny Hurley probably didn't recruit too many of those guys at Rhode Island, but he was able to do it when he got to UCONN. It's hard to say what HC from mid-major is or isn't going to be able to do that.I'm not claiming we need to pop off these top 10 classes, but the majority of the top teams have been a solid mix of recruits and transfers. The next coach needs to have some experience recruiting top 50 guys in my mind.
I knew we were in trouble early on with KP when he decided he didn't need to go after guards in the portal,relying on a guy that loved to shoot more than anybody since RS.I think if you can do some winning through the portal year one
I don’t think he knows anything either but you’re right, he’s pushing for Schertz like he’s his agent.Valvano has been pimping Schertz all day on his show. Went as far to say, “Unless something drastic happens…he’s your next coach”.
I don’t think he knows this and he sure doesn’t speak for Heird. Valvano over the top as often happens.
I knew we were in trouble at his first press conference then disappeared when he should have been putting a staff together.I knew we were in trouble early on with KP when he decided he didn't need to go after guards in the portal,relying on a guy that loved to shoot more than anybody since RS.
Both of those St Peter's guards were available and either one would've improved that team last season.