So you haven't done anything but perform to the level of your talent. While everyone else--with the possible exception of Duke--OUTPERFORMS when they make the Final Four.
And when did the Final Four become satisfactory for an 'elite' program? When you couldn't win the last game or two??
"Elite program', my a$$...
You're the only person in the world who considers a final four a loss. Regardless of talent.
He's an uninteresting, slappy apologist.
"Elite program", my a$$...
Your problem with me is that I root for Kentucky. Nothing more. Nothing less.
As a college basketball fan, your statement is really sad. Having a random one and done player is great, a roster full of them is just not college ball, that is more D league than collegiate.
I've said it before and I'm sure I'll be here to say it again... I would love to mix our incoming frosh with some upper class players. This year we actually have three seniors that get quality minutes (Mulder, Hawkins, Willis), two of those being from
Kentucky. We have sophomores that get good minutes (Briscoe, Hump) and obviously the four freshman. Now what was the problem again?