ADVERTISEMENT

Georgia Tech Facing Recruiting Violations For Visit To Strip Club

You mean besides being a key figure in the corruption of college basketball? Oh wait, Lite and most of college basketball haven't done anything wrong...
Ok, so how is he a key figure? (Waiting for the goals posts to immediately move)
 
Ask UMass what? The NCAA investigator even said Cal was a victim.
Ask Memphis what? Rose wasn't even on campus yet when his alleged cheating happened. Again, no charges against Cal from the NCAA.
Ellen is his first wife.
The FBI has nothing on Cal but I guess you can keep hoping.

https://coachcal.com/news/2018/10/3...ceive-award-from-basketball-hall-of-fame.aspx

For starters, he also raised a million for Letcher County after the tornados. And let's not forget the million he was just paid by Facebook is all being donated. There is more but you get the point.



The point is you are a Blue Kool Aid drinking moron idiot....could not decide which one. If you don't work for the FBI you know not of what you speak.

UMass probation, Memphis probation because of his being the victim in all this. Fool me once shame on you, twice, shame on me. Does being naive ring any bells in that dim witted brain of yours?

Donations he makes sure you know about. Good for him. Charity is best done in private....not public...unless you are Cow lover.
 
When Louisville got in trouble because of the whore and her whore daughters Coach Cow said that the head coach CRP definitely knew this was going on. Insinuating that the head coach of any program knows when things like this are going on. That would mean he knew about the cheating at UMass and Memphis. I can tell you first hand that no one in Memphis believes he didn't know about the cheating.
 
The point is you are a Blue Kool Aid drinking moron idiot....could not decide which one. If you don't work for the FBI you know not of what you speak.

UMass probation, Memphis probation because of his being the victim in all this. Fool me once shame on you, twice, shame on me. Does being naive ring any bells in that dim witted brain of yours?

Donations he makes sure you know about. Good for him. Charity is best done in private....not public...unless you are Cow lover.
He set up telethons for much of it. Keeping that quiet doesnt work well.
 
The point is you are a Blue Kool Aid drinking moron idiot....could not decide which one. If you don't work for the FBI you know not of what you speak.

UMass probation, Memphis probation because of his being the victim in all this. Fool me once shame on you, twice, shame on me. Does being naive ring any bells in that dim witted brain of yours?

Donations he makes sure you know about. Good for him. Charity is best done in private....not public...unless you are Cow lover.

I'll take it you can't support anything that you claimed, just innuendo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bouncebackcats
Son, el chapo did charities. Now get back to fantasyland and jerk on each other about how great and clean BBN is while the rest of the world shakes their head and laughs.

No logical person believes the shit you’re spewing. I’m not even that blind about our university
 
That conflating you're doing doesn't make me sense and doesn't make Cal guilty of anything other than recruiting 5*'s.
I think you're trying to argue--since you won't say it--that recruiting blue chip kids doesn't make anyone guilty of anything. Unfortunately, that's a bit like saying "I didn't know it was stolen property". It doesn't mean you're off the hook.

If you want me to post evidence that higher rated kids are involved in pay for play, I can easily do that--and you know it. If you want me to show examples where head coaches claim they "didn't know", I can do that too. NONE OF THAT removes the smoke around programs that have recruited these kids but who so far haven't been directly implicated. Only if you're in slapd!ck denial do you go around saying "all is well" unless you're the guy in freefall from the skyscraper.

And like a few of my U of L friends, don't be vulnerable to the argument from ignorance... Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
 
I think you're trying to argue--since you won't say it--that recruiting blue chip kids doesn't make anyone guilty of anything. Unfortunately, that's a bit like saying "I didn't know it was stolen property". It doesn't mean you're off the hook.

If you want me to post evidence that higher rated kids are involved in pay for play, I can easily do that--and you know it. If you want me to show examples where head coaches claim they "didn't know", I can do that too. NONE OF THAT removes the smoke around programs that have recruited these kids but who so far haven't been directly implicated. Only if you're in slapd!ck denial do you go around saying "all is well" unless you're the guy in freefall from the skyscraper.

And like a few of my U of L friends, don't be vulnerable to the argument from ignorance... Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Actually you're incorrect Zipp. One can innocently buy stolen property and it's yours to keep. In and of itself, recruiting top players doesn't mean anything other than you recruited top players. If Cal cheated I'll insist he's fired just the same as in the Sutton days.

As for what you can post to support your position, actually post something that Cal did wrong and I'll agree with you, otherwise its wishful thinking by those who hate him. Where there's smoke only becomes fire when some evidence actually exists. I'm not big on innuendo, bias or wishful thinking.
 
God bless, bro. Innocently buying stolen goods doesn’t mean it’s yours, it means that shit gets seized and you’re out of your innocent money.

You legitimately believe that everyone else is involved in the scandal but UKaaay. GTFOH and try to use some sort of common sense. Everyone is in on this.
 
God bless, bro. Innocently buying stolen goods doesn’t mean it’s yours, it means that shit gets seized and you’re out of your innocent money.

You legitimately believe that everyone else is involved in the scandal but UKaaay. GTFOH and try to use some sort of common sense. Everyone is in on this.
Mostly true - unless you are a pawnbroker in Kentucky. Then the stolen goods have to be purchased (typically by the person they were stolen from) from you - or they're yours.
 
Actually you're incorrect Zipp. One can innocently buy stolen property and it's yours to keep...
Possession of Stolen Property Law and Legal Definition
...As for what you can post to support your position, actually post something that Cal did wrong and I'll agree with you, otherwise its wishful thinking by those who hate him. Where there's smoke only becomes fire when some evidence actually exists. I'm not big on innuendo, bias or wishful thinking.
Of course a slapd!ck is not. You were fine with that when Lite was at Memphis.

And again, you don't understand with your "post something wrong" comment what an Argument from Ignorance means. There's more circumstantial evidence around your program than any other program in the country based simply in how many blue chip kids your coach has signed.

4d0d5fb2b98082fac758cdb3a8431c7a--history-activities-the-egyptian.jpg
 
Possession of Stolen Property Law and Legal Definition

Of course a slapd!ck is not. You were fine with that when Lite was at Memphis.

And again, you don't understand with your "post something wrong" comment what an Argument from Ignorance means. There's more circumstantial evidence around your program than any other program in the country based simply in how many blue chip kids your coach has signed.

4d0d5fb2b98082fac758cdb3a8431c7a--history-activities-the-egyptian.jpg
To be "in possession of stolen property" means you knew or had specific reason to know it was stolen. As I said, if one innocently buys something that happens to be stolen, its yours, at least here in Georgia. In some states they make you give it back and then the thief owes you, which is absurd on its face.
 
To be "in possession of stolen property" means you knew or had specific reason to know it was stolen. As I said, if one innocently buys something that happens to be stolen, its yours, at least here in Georgia. In some states they make you give it back and then the thief owes you, which is absurd on its face.
Are you saying that it's unreasonable to suspect that a blue chip college basketball player is taking money? And for a coach who has purposely exposed himself to that very culture and dynamic? I'll bet I can guess how an objective 3rd party sees those questions.

But none of that matters as far as the NCAA. All that has to be proven is whether you benefited from it, whether you knew or not. And in their context of "should have known", that won't serve as much of a defense.

You play in the mud, you get a little muddy. No one but a slapd!ck will question that...
 
Are you saying that it's unreasonable to suspect that a blue chip college basketball player is taking money? And for a coach who has purposely exposed himself to that very culture and dynamic? I'll bet I can guess how an objective 3rd party sees those questions.

But none of that matters as far as the NCAA. All that has to be proven is whether you benefited from it, whether you knew or not. And in their context of "should have known", that won't serve as much of a defense.

You play in the mud, you get a little muddy. No one but a slapd!ck will question that...
Is it unreasonable to have suspicions? Nope. But that isn't what is usually said here, by you and others. You convict without evidence or a trial. That is my issue. I believe an objective third party, which you guys on this board are not, would wait for some hint of evidence before pronouncing guilt.
 
Is it unreasonable to have suspicions? Nope. But that isn't what is usually said here, by you and others. You convict without evidence or a trial. That is my issue. I believe an objective third party, which you guys on this board are not, would wait for some hint of evidence before pronouncing guilt.
You're in a dream world where you think you likely dodged FIFTY 5-star bullets.

And when you've already seen several of your recruits mentioned in FBI evidence.

Slappy denial is a special kinda denial...
 
I’m proud of the Birdgang. We let a delusional UKaaay Billy come into our world and speak irrational nonsense and were decent towards the poor guy.

Meanwhile, speaking logic on the Lair is instant ban.

I pray that dude picks up some sense while he’s here but i doubt it

That cat is one strange bird for sure...
 
Fact or anecdotal? Have the right people been told?
Plenty of media reports still available should you care to Google it. By the “right people” I’m assuming you mean Brainfart? It seems that he was told - which is why he didn’t hire Cow the first go around and only caved after the failed experiment with the drunken Irishman.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT