Almost all the finals in any college sport are nationally televised. I watched Florida women's tennis win the national championship (for whatever reason) back in 2012. So i guess according to your standards its also relevant....
But counting women's basketball because 1. Your team made it to the finals and 2. because it was nationally televised, are pretty stupid reasons for saying its relevant, its not, don't be like Zipp and try to make it happen, its not going to happen. (LPT).
Here's the deal. If it is "relevant" to enough of an audience that it is nationally televised, it IS relevant. Nobody is claiming it is relevant to the majority of general sports fans nation wide. But it, and UofL's achievements in those fields, are relevant and respected in those sports. Title games in women's basketball and men's soccer, CWS in men's baseball, and BCS bowls in football are absolutely significant achievements in those sports. If BBN in little ole Kentucky doesn't care because they don't have the same level of success in those sports, that doesn't make them irrelevant. Guess what, success in college cheerleading and women's track & field IS televised and significant in those fields, and to those audiences. Claiming otherwise is just sour grapes. Maybe you should appreciate your school's other success stories, instead of futilely trying to downplay someone else's. And FTR, I guaruntee Matthew Mitchell and Gary Henderson would trade every single win over Louisville for a title game or CWS appearance.
Last edited: