There's plenty of talent posting on this board. The field which the talent is in is the only true question.Originally posted by ACCCard:
We have a lot more critics than talent on this board.
hahahahaOriginally posted by steve0UL:
no doubt. the "10 minutes into the game i am going to throw my hands up and say i am done with this team and then come to louisville rivals page and cry" is overplayed here.
Originally posted by ACCCard:
I get that this venue is a place to brag, poke rivals, argue and complain, but when amateurs pretend they know more than professionals, that is where it becomes both amusing and annoying to me. Not that they shouldn't share their opinions, but sometimes it just gets ridiculous.J/K
Sports brings out the devil in a lot of people. Too many associate the worth of their own lives to the outcome of a game. Sad but true.
Originally posted by Rob_deVille:
These threads have a little bit of irony to them.
Complain about UofL basketball: Scorn. Complain about UofL fans: Applause.Well, let's analyze that a little bit...
If you have played or coached college basketball at this level, you would deserve a little more space to criticize. And if this applies to you, please identify yourself for that consideration.
If you've been a fan of a college basketball team at this level, being able to legitimately criticize other fans should similarly apply. Most of us here probably meet this test.
Note that in these cases, you can simply criticize without qualification and you can criticize legitimately. There's a difference that results in scorn or applause. And I see no paradox therein...
You mean complain about Coach Pitino-scorn.Originally posted by Rob_deVille:
These threads have a little bit of irony to them.
Complain about UofL basketball: Scorn. Complain about UofL fans: Applause.
Originally posted by Rob_deVille:
Zipp, give your internet identity a rest. Shut the laptop and hangout with your family. They miss you.
You're like Louisville Rivals.com's own personal Lawnmower Man.Thanks for the suggestion, but I'd stay with the topic unless you have nothing else to contribute...
Originally posted by zipp:
Sports are entertainment. You're supposed to either enjoy it as a participant or as an observer.
If you're paid to either play or watch, you have more on the line than simply entertainment value. For that person, it may be a business. If someday you may be paid in those capacities, it should/could be taken as a future business endeavor. I doubt that applies to any of us here. For us, it's simply entertainment.
When you take something too seriously, it moves beyond the realm of reality. It has side effects. You take losing personally and look for someone or something to blame. You react emotionally and irrationally. You posture as someone you're not, like a basketball coach. And my experience is that typically, you don't like it when someone points that stuff out. You get personal with whoever it is that disagrees with you.
It's possible to criticize without resorting to those tactics, a point that most of our persistent critics here gloss over. Those of you in this camp want to simplify the world as rational critics vs. pollyannas. It helps you feel better characterizing the rest of us as eternally optimistic, glass-half-full types. It's a defensive tactic on your part. But it's part of your delusion.
Keep up the effort if you want--doesn't matter to me 'cuz I love a good debate. Just don't expect me to ignore what's at the root of your issue: you take it too seriously...
This post was edited on 3/22 7:18 PM by zipp
This post was edited on 3/22 8:12 PM by zippOriginally posted by Kratz:
I have no problem criticizing Lord Pitino when he deserves it.
Do I have to be an "expert" or have "talent" to see that he has some recruiting issues? Or can I simply point out the obvious? This team can't shoot. Pitino didn't do a good job in recruiting a shooter for this team.
Senior night consisted of 1 senior: Blackshear. No Ware, Behanan, Jones, Zach Price or Angel Nunez. To lose that many players is a recruiting issue.
But then again I'm no expert...Too many of you guys assign cause and effect with no research behind it. Case in point...no seniors.
How many seniors who get quality PT are on Duke, Kansas, and Arizona? One...COMBINED. So that's obviously not a determinant of a quality team or recruiting class. LPT thinks it's good to not have any seniors. And many here--not me in particular--would love to have their players.
I do think Pitino may have recruiting issues. But it's not as simplistic as "no seniors".
Our problem is also not shooting accuracy, technically speaking. Our per-game field goal percentage is not statistically different than it was during our 2013 championship run. (A good comparison unless you think THAT team had shooting issues...) Rather, it's shooting CONSISTENCY. Our variation in per-game FG % is statistically higher than it was in 2013. I'm not even sure Pitino is aware of that since I've never heard him mention it. And before you call that semantics, it's not. Better shooting is maybe something you recruit for. More consistent shooting is likely based on taking good shots and offensive execution. IOW, something that's probably attainable with the players we have now.
Offbase criticism is the same thing as bad data. Bad data is usually worse than no data at all. Try to know WTH you're talking about esp. if you wanna criticize...
Zipp - apparently the entertainment value of the tourney has gone up again this year. Thursday and Friday set ratings records. Looks like the "demise" of the tourney may be premature.Originally posted by zipp:
Sports are entertainment. You're supposed to either enjoy it as a participant or as an observer.
If you're paid to either play or watch, you have more on the line than simply entertainment value. For that person, it may be a business. If someday you may be paid in those capacities, it should/could be taken as a future business endeavor. I doubt that applies to any of us here. For us, it's simply entertainment.
When you take something too seriously, it moves beyond the realm of reality. It has side effects. You take losing personally and look for someone or something to blame. You react emotionally and irrationally. You posture as someone you're not, like a basketball coach. And my experience is that typically, you don't like it when someone points that stuff out. You get personal with whoever it is that disagrees with you.
It's possible to criticize without resorting to those tactics, a point that most of our persistent critics here gloss over. Those of you in this camp want to simplify the world as rational critics vs. pollyannas. It helps you feel better characterizing the rest of us as eternally optimistic, glass-half-full types. It's a defensive tactic on your part. But it's part of your delusion.
Keep up the effort if you want--doesn't matter to me 'cuz I love a good debate. Just don't expect me to ignore what's at the root of your issue: you take it too seriously...
This post was edited on 3/22 7:18 PM by zipp
Originally posted by Cardiac Red:
...if I come on here and I'm pissed because Rick doesn't play freshman, or doesn't play someone because they can't play D, or their body fat is more than 7%, or he recruits too many projects, or just because I don't like him, that's my perogative as long as I don't violate the rules of this board, you rarely come back with a counterpoint, you come back with a psychological evaluation and tell me (and others) I'm investing myself too much in a game, and I'm not qualified to have my opinion or I'm talking out school because I'm not a multi-million dollar HOF coach, I say Bullshit, I'm only on this board to converse with other Louisville fans, most of my friends are either slapdick or IU fans, or don't even follow sports. It's ok to have different opinions, and if the people some of you complain about didn't come here to post this board would be dead.I'd challenge you to find examples of what you're crediting me with above. For example, find where I've dodged any of your critical points. Or where I've said you weren't qualified to have an opinion. That's different BTW than my saying your opinions are wrong and presenting arguments to that effect. Of course, you take that personally, which is part and parcel to what I'm talking about.
Just like admitting you come here "pi$$ed" is... It also explains exaggeration on your part, which you've just done. Again. If you're gonna be irrational and not conduct rational debate, you're gonna go head to head with me just about all the time. And knowing why you come here doesn't cause me to change that tact.
Ultimately, it's your choice...
Originally posted by Knucklehank1:
Zipp - apparently the entertainment value of the tourney has gone up again this year. Thursday and Friday set ratings records. Looks like the "demise" of the tourney may be premature.So, are you confused with which thread you're on?
Bring that one forward, and I'll be glad to pick up where we left off...
The mighty midget has spoken. Only one out of 5- 6 potential seniors actually made it to senior night, but Zipp blindly doesn't see an issue with that. Since you want to break it down to data, roughly 20% of the players Pitino recruited for this year actually made it to Senior night. Is 20% a satisfactory statistic for you?Originally posted by zipp:
This post was edited on 3/22 8:12 PM by zippOriginally posted by Kratz:
I have no problem criticizing Lord Pitino when he deserves it.
Do I have to be an "expert" or have "talent" to see that he has some recruiting issues? Or can I simply point out the obvious? This team can't shoot. Pitino didn't do a good job in recruiting a shooter for this team.
Senior night consisted of 1 senior: Blackshear. No Ware, Behanan, Jones, Zach Price or Angel Nunez. To lose that many players is a recruiting issue.
But then again I'm no expert...Too many of you guys assign cause and effect with no research behind it. Case in point...no seniors.
How many seniors who get quality PT are on Duke, Kansas, and Arizona? One...COMBINED. So that's obviously not a determinant of a quality team or recruiting class. LPT thinks it's good to not have any seniors. And many here--not me in particular--would love to have their players.
I do think Pitino may have recruiting issues. But it's not as simplistic as "no seniors".
Our problem is also not shooting accuracy, technically speaking. Our per-game field goal percentage is not statistically different than it was during our 2013 championship run. (A good comparison unless you think THAT team had shooting issues...) Rather, it's shooting CONSISTENCY. Our variation in per-game FG % is statistically higher than it was in 2013. I'm not even sure Pitino is aware of that since I've never heard him mention it. And before you call that semantics, it's not. Better shooting is maybe something you recruit for. More consistent shooting is likely based on taking good shots and offensive execution. IOW, something that's probably attainable with the players we have now.
Offbase criticism is the same thing as bad data. Bad data is usually worse than no data at all. Try to know WTH you're talking about esp. if you wanna criticize...
Originally posted by Kratz:
The mighty midget has spoken. Only one out of 5- 6 potential seniors actually made it to senior night, but Zipp blindly doesn't see an issue with that. Since you want to break it down to data, roughly 20% of the players Pitino recruited for this year actually made it to Senior night. Is 20% a satisfactory statistic for you?
And it's not like any of these kids left for the NBA. They either left on their own or were dismissed. There's also been rumblings that Aaron and Gill could be gone after this season. You ok with adding two more to the list? Hey, it's just data, right?
So come back with your next flippant, apologist, red shaded glasses answer that ignores the FACT that Pitino has recruiting issues. Tell us how a 20% rate isn't an indicator that Pitino is making some serious mistakes in his recruiting process.Never said we don't have some recruiting issues. In fact, I hinted we did. I just didn't offer unsubstantiated opinions, i.e., conclusions and cause-and-effect without evidence. Like some of my favorite whiners in this space do.
Let's keep exaggerating and getting personal. Like it when the other guy does that...
Originally posted by Rob_deVille:
Zipp, again, trying his hardest to become the focus of a thread.
The loneliness is strong in this one...
Forgot to mention, my "family" said thanks for your help. I told them you didn't know what else to say...
This post was edited on 3/22 11:43 PM by zippOriginally posted by Kratz:
Please do tell me what unsubstantiated opinions, cause and effect claims that I made. Everything I said was FACT. Roughly 20% of the players that were supposed to be seniors on this years team didn't make it, and it's not because any of them went to the NBA. They either left or were dismissed.
Where's the exaggeration in that statement? Where's the lack of evidence? It's all right there in hard core statistics. Nice try at a deflection though. Oh, that's right, you HINTED. I guess when presented with irrefutable facts you have to at least hint that someone other than you may have a valid point.You first need to show how the percentage of seniors on our team indicates recruiting issues. I don't recall that stat ever used in the past to indicate anything. The 2011 team was a team of overachievers and a fan favorite with ONE senior (Knowles) in the class. I think Pitino has said that team re-energized him.
You have no data indicating that cause and effect. Even a correlation doesn't prove causation. And I've given you several examples where there likely isn't even correlation. I could argue that you have BAD data (proving the opposite). Unlike some of you guys, I "hint" when I don't know for sure instead of spew my emotional garbage.
"The mighty midget has spoken"... Beautiful stuff, if you're an LPT fan.
"So come back with your next flippant, apologist, red shaded glasses answer that ignores the FACT that Pitino has recruiting issues. Tell us how a 20% rate isn't an indicator that Pitino is making some serious mistakes in his recruiting process"...
All that bull$hit is exaggeration. Either about me or the real focus of your hate, Pitino. A damn shame some of you guys can't appreciate what you have instead of b!tch and whine about what you want or feel you're entitled to. Like the big guy said... "No talent."
Originally posted by Rob_deVille:
Lawnmower Man.To reiterate, nothing else to say.
Originally posted by Rob_deVille:
Lawnmower Man.And STILL, nothing else to say.
Thanks for proving my "mighty midget" analogy. I presented you with cold, hard facts and the only thing you've got is "you're an LPT fan" or a "Pitino hater". LOL. So who's the one doing the name calling?Originally posted by zipp:
This post was edited on 3/22 11:43 PM by zippOriginally posted by Kratz:
Please do tell me what unsubstantiated opinions, cause and effect claims that I made. Everything I said was FACT. Roughly 20% of the players that were supposed to be seniors on this years team didn't make it, and it's not because any of them went to the NBA. They either left or were dismissed.
Where's the exaggeration in that statement? Where's the lack of evidence? It's all right there in hard core statistics. Nice try at a deflection though. Oh, that's right, you HINTED. I guess when presented with irrefutable facts you have to at least hint that someone other than you may have a valid point.You first need to show how the percentage of seniors on our team indicates recruiting issues. I don't recall that stat ever used in the past to indicate anything. The 2011 team was a team of overachievers and a fan favorite with ONE senior (Knowles) in the class. I think Pitino has said that team re-energized him.
You have no data indicating that cause and effect. Even a correlation doesn't prove causation. And I've given you several examples where there likely isn't even correlation. I could argue that you have BAD data (proving the opposite). Unlike some of you guys, I "hint" when I don't know for sure instead of spew my emotional garbage.
"The mighty midget has spoken"... Beautiful stuff, if you're an LPT fan.
"So come back with your next flippant, apologist, red shaded glasses answer that ignores the FACT that Pitino has recruiting issues. Tell us how a 20% rate isn't an indicator that Pitino is making some serious mistakes in his recruiting process"...
All that bull$hit is exaggeration. Either about me or the real focus of your hate, Pitino. A damn shame some of you guys can't appreciate what you have instead of b!tch and whine about what you want or feel you're entitled to. Like the big guy said... "No talent."
Originally posted by ACCCard:
Come on back critics? We miss you tonight. Where are you?Well, one came back. If only to enlighten us about what he is and isn't.
Conceding anything is tough when they're as emotional and irrational as they are. And when they've invested so much personally. That's the part I don't understand--why it's so personal for them. You'd almost think THEY coached the team or signed the coach's paycheck. I do understand that different people live under different circumstances. One guy can't debate for too long without bringing his wife into the issue, and yesterday he laments how many LPT fans he has to live with. Marital stuff and LPT fans are factors I don't care about hearing, but they probably matter.
The old memory ain't what it used to be, but I need to try harder to remember who they are. The more they debate, the easier that is...
WRONG.Originally posted by NISMOZCARD:
I have observed endless debate here about recruiting issues and so forth. The fact is, Louisville basketball is having the best run they have ever had! I personally have been enjoying it instead of worrying about what could have been. My observation is that too many of the negative thinkers are so affected by what UK is doing that they cannot enjoy what Louisville is doing. When Pitino leaves, the Cards will be hard pressed to find a replacement that has brought the kind of success to this program he has. You may just find that then you will really have something to complain, worry and gripe about. "Microwave society"