Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Money has nothing to do with winning, like it used too. They are projecting the SEC will make $1.3 billion in 2024 and the Big Ten a little more. The next conference is the Big 12 at $600 million. TV deals are driving this, The Big Ten`s deal is with Fox, CBS and NBC. The SEC is with ESPN/ABC. As it stands now the SEC and Big Ten schools will be splitting twice as much money as the next conference, a team can go 0-11 and still get an equal share.The ACC as a whole just get better and things will work themselves out. FSU arrogance is going to bite them. The best spot for them is the ACC. It gives them the best chance to win. They win recruiting will follow. A regular spot in the playoff will follow. Money will come. That isn’t happening in the SEC and it probably won’t happen in Big Ten because winning becomes much more difficult
FSU remains a massive brand.there's about a $30 million difference i believe. a buyout costs the amount of years left on the contract x annual payout.
"How much money would it cost a school to leave? It’s their annual revenue distribution from the league multiplied by the number of years remaining on the grant of rights contract. In simple terms, if a school gets $40 million a year from the ACC and 10 years remain in the contract, that’s $400 million."
"Meanwhile, Clemson is making about $35 million per season now in the ACC. Accoriding figures from a data analysis firm called Navigate in March, ACC members can expect to pull around $60 million by 2029."
so in money terms, FSU would hire a hedge fund to put of the $400,000,000 lets say. they need to get a return on their invest so it's a balance of how much interest are the getting, how long is the term, hwo much do they think they are going to make off ad partnerships with FSU, how much of the yearly payout does FSU give up and will they actually get less per year, and if the difference is onlly $30,000,000, that's going to be almsot 30 years to recoup investment for the hedge fun, but if some bean counter decides that they can get a constant 10% return for 30+ years they'll take it.
funny thing is FSU is really not great in any sport and don;t bring anything to the table, imho
Not as the eighth place team in the $EC. They have no chance to win that league. They haven’t won the ACC in years, why do they think they’ll like being 6-6 in the SEC?FSU remains a massive brand.
Conference realignment has been about introducing new TV markets into the conferences. Florida State is in the panhandle and the SEC doesn`t need that. They have Florida for the TV market in that state and we have Georgia. Same with Clemson, we have the South Carolina TV market. What they need is the NC and DMV markets. Thats NC, NC State, Virginia and Tech. If the SEC expands further, that`s the schools they`ll probably target. Since this is a football move, Duke maybe left out.Not as the eighth place team in the $EC. They have no chance to win that league. They haven’t won the ACC in years, why do they think they’ll like being 6-6 in the SEC?
I agree with this and even more so with FSU. If either of those teams stay in the ACC and have a great season they will be in the playoffs. If they jump to the SEC or Big? Their opportunities are not going to come very often because it's going to be harder to have a great season.. Kind of the big fish in a small pond or small fish in a big pond argument..As the SEC continues its expansion, and the elite get stronger; it will be interesting to see if the “middle of the road”, and the “bottom feeders” can sustain fan support.
Clemson is now, and has always been the elite team in the ACC, and deserves the National prominence it has enjoyed, particularly in Death Valley where they dominate. As good as the Tigers are, I honestly believe they too would struggle in the SEC. Their loss to South Carolina last year was not a fluke; it serves as a warning to those ACC schools thinking about moving into the SEC.
Markets don’t matter compared to big programs. It’s all about primetime TV matchups.Conference realignment has been about introducing new TV markets into the conferences. Florida State is in the panhandle and the SEC doesn`t need that. They have Florida for the TV market in that state and we have Georgia. Same with Clemson, we have the South Carolina TV market. What they need is the NC and DMV markets. Thats NC, NC State, Virginia and Tech. If the SEC expands further, that`s the schools they`ll probably target. Since this is a football move, Duke maybe left out.
I agree, Florida State wouldn`t be as successful in the SEC, at least not year to year. The SEC will have the typical powers and adding Texas and Oklahoma. A 4 loss SEC team would still be top 25 team going forward.
How long will that be allowed? At some point the big dogs will tire of sharing and leave to form a new league. The bottom feeders will be left behind.Money has nothing to do with winning, like it used too. They are projecting the SEC will make $1.3 billion in 2024 and the Big Ten a little more. The next conference is the Big 12 at $600 million. TV deals are driving this, The Big Ten`s deal is with Fox, CBS and NBC. The SEC is with ESPN/ABC. As it stands now the SEC and Big Ten schools will be splitting twice as much money as the next conference, a team can go 0-11 and still get an equal share.
How long will that be allowed? At some point the big dogs will tire of sharing and leave to form a new league. The bottom feeders will be left behind.
I don`t think that will happen, not saying it won`t, I just don't it happening. They still want to win and if they have loaded conferences, everyone could end the season at 6-6 to 8-4 and be left out of any playoff. The SEC has always shared so that`s nothing new to them. They even split the bowl money. Now, if the players become employee`s and I can see that happening, that may change things. The one question I have is this, if the players become employee`s, will they have to go to school or will they be there just to play ball? Ok... one more question, what will happen to the minor sports?How long will that be allowed? At some point the big dogs will tire of sharing and leave to form a new league. The bottom feeders will be left behind.
Except UNC. UVA want the Big 10. They’re snob schools and the SEC is below them academically. Once the door opens those two jump to the Big 10. That’s been common knowledge for years. And it’s not a secret in the ACC. So the SEC can co after NCSU or WF neither bring a large marketConference realignment has been about introducing new TV markets into the conferences. Florida State is in the panhandle and the SEC doesn`t need that. They have Florida for the TV market in that state and we have Georgia. Same with Clemson, we have the South Carolina TV market. What they need is the NC and DMV markets. Thats NC, NC State, Virginia and Tech. If the SEC expands further, that`s the schools they`ll probably target. Since this is a football move, Duke maybe left out.
I agree, Florida State wouldn`t be as successful in the SEC, at least not year to year. The SEC will have the typical powers and adding Texas and Oklahoma. A 4 loss SEC team would still be top 25 team going forward.
This won`t happen in the near future, but I can see the Big Ten and SEC joining in an alignment. They can go to 20 teams and going to a pro style playoff. They can have five 4 team divisions and the top 2 in each division being in the playoffs. The champion of each conference will play for the "championship". The other schools will have their own format.The employee thing becomes another rabbit hole, but it is coming.
The SEC is going to get hit with parody in the league. They all have talented players and good coaching. Bringing Texas and Oklahoma only brings in more talent and resources. Then bring in FSU and Clemson who have all the resources as well. The margin for error in that league is incredibly small. Even more than today each week will become a blood bath.
Money does matter and winning is directly related to winning titles in football.
Oh I think this is the plan and it’s closer than any of us would like to admit.This won`t happen in the near future, but I can see the Big Ten and SEC joining in an alignment. They can go to 20 teams and going to a pro style playoff. They can have five 4 team divisions and the top 2 in each division being in the playoffs. The champion of each conference will play for the "championship". The other schools will have their own format.
I`m old and I think my opinion matters, even though it doesn`t.................... lol.
Or it will go back to how it was before the court ruling where the NCAA couldn’t own all the TV rights.Eventually programs are gonna go the way of Notre Dame and negotiate their own individual tv deals.
That’s why I love your posts. Numbers. Money. You and I aren’t on the same side of some issues, but you bring the numbers and I hope you think I bring mine to state my case too.All schools will look out for their own financial interests. No one really gives a damn about their conference or the little guys in it. Just lip service...
What did TJ do for the dental school?That’s why I love your posts. Numbers. Money. You and I aren’t on the same side of some issues, but you bring the numbers and I hope you think I bring mine to state my case too.
You are right that our current admin doesn’t understand what Ramsey and Jurich understood. Even the drunk red faced Pizza Racist understood it too. It’s about maximizing that dollar and your brand.
The group that got the football stadium got it started. Tom came in and really worked to improve everything. From donors to facilities. Coaches pay. Fan experience. It had to be top notch. James Ramsey’s leadership allowed it.
The hiring of Pitino was what took us to the next level. Tom took the swing for the fences and got us the guy. People don’t understand what Rick Pitino did for this University and city. He’s the guy that made people believe. Many of our 30 and under crowd don’t realize that Rick Pitino was one of the biggest names in all of sports in 2001. He got the donors and the casual city fans to take us seriously.
Then James and Tom didn’t stop. They made sure our entire athletics dept was elite. Not to mention our world class schools like our Dental program that gets no credit. Money from big business. Games on ESPN primetime to get us exposure. The Adidas deal. The wealth was spread. Then it got us to the Big East and now ACC.
Now Tom Jurich and Ramsey are gone. That’s a fact. We can’t change that now. But it’s on the current group to build on what the last group started.
Denny Crum made us a national brand. Howard made our football program get noticed which led to Papa John’s Stadium. Then it kept going. You can rest on what others have built like what others have done, or you can keep going further.
Doc Ramsey used to say that "athletics is the front porch" to your school.What did TJ do for the dental school?
I’ll try again. What did TJ do for the dental school?Doc Ramsey used to say that "athletics is the front porch" to your school.
I miss Doc...
I'm not speaking for @LeFors4Ever, but it's not clear to me why you asked and maybe the same with him.I’ll try again. What did TJ do for the dental school?
See his post, Tuesday, 3:42 pm.I'm not speaking for @LeFors4Ever, but it's not clear to me why you asked and maybe the same with him.
What's your point since there's no way to answer a question like that?...
Interestingly, the new president seems a bit invisible so far, which is both good and bad. Of course, being an out of towner my primary contact with UofL is these boards, but if she just decides to let athletics run itself it would be an improvement over her predecessor.It isn’t that Jurich over rated I doubt anyone feels he is over rated. It is that he gets a free pass on these boards for all the things that brought Louisville down. All the good outweighs the negative but the negative was under his watch. Bottom line he was not without his faults.
I do agree Ramsey and Jurich understood the importance of college athletics to this University. It would be wise to for the new President to embrace athletics.
I agree they don't need FSU & Clemson for markets, but does the 4 you named increase the $ that they'd get from TV? Highly doubtful adding those 4 would add enough TV$ to prevent the dilution of the $ per team. Doesn't make sense to a team(s) unless $ increases the per team share.Conference realignment has been about introducing new TV markets into the conferences. Florida State is in the panhandle and the SEC doesn`t need that. They have Florida for the TV market in that state and we have Georgia. Same with Clemson, we have the South Carolina TV market. What they need is the NC and DMV markets. Thats NC, NC State, Virginia and Tech. If the SEC expands further, that`s the schools they`ll probably target. Since this is a football move, Duke maybe left out.
I agree, Florida State wouldn`t be as successful in the SEC, at least not year to year. The SEC will have the typical powers and adding Texas and Oklahoma. A 4 loss SEC team would still be top 25 team going forward.