I'm listening to him on the radio as I write this. He was interviewed live on ESPN from the broadcast table at yesterday's game. And he started his comments on the radio acknowledging that he doesn't often attend women's basketball games.
Valvano just referred to the comparison between the game environments at women's and men's basketball games as "jawdroppingly" different. And he's gone on to attribute at least some of it to the makeup of fans in the lower sideline seats. This is a reference to the well heeled or corporate buyers of premium men's seats and the emotional state of those fans at games.
If he attended more games, he would have witnessed the same thing at most women's games and wouldn't have been surprised yesterday. Valvano would also have noticed that there are very few students at women's games who are outwardly the most emotional and vocal part of any fanbase. In fact, an entire endzone is comprised of students at--or set aside for them to attend--men's basketball games. I'm also not sure (nor is he) how many of the lower sideline seats are now populated by the same type of affluent buyer at women's games. It's just a convenient excuse to say that those folks are less inclined to cheer and clap.
What Bob won't say (and I will) is that he just witnessed firsthand the game environment for two U of L athletics programs heading in opposite directions. Granted it was UK, but there were 12 thousand fans in attendance yesterday which is right at the average that the men's team is averaging this year. There's no comparison for how the two teams perform on the court, and there are a growing number of fans like me who have season tickets in women's basketball and won't step in the door of a men's game. In fact, I turned down a pair of free tickets to a men's game this year; I just wasn't interested.
I also know firsthand that type of apathy didn't evolve overnight. And a new AD has his job cut out how to reverse it...
Valvano just referred to the comparison between the game environments at women's and men's basketball games as "jawdroppingly" different. And he's gone on to attribute at least some of it to the makeup of fans in the lower sideline seats. This is a reference to the well heeled or corporate buyers of premium men's seats and the emotional state of those fans at games.
If he attended more games, he would have witnessed the same thing at most women's games and wouldn't have been surprised yesterday. Valvano would also have noticed that there are very few students at women's games who are outwardly the most emotional and vocal part of any fanbase. In fact, an entire endzone is comprised of students at--or set aside for them to attend--men's basketball games. I'm also not sure (nor is he) how many of the lower sideline seats are now populated by the same type of affluent buyer at women's games. It's just a convenient excuse to say that those folks are less inclined to cheer and clap.
What Bob won't say (and I will) is that he just witnessed firsthand the game environment for two U of L athletics programs heading in opposite directions. Granted it was UK, but there were 12 thousand fans in attendance yesterday which is right at the average that the men's team is averaging this year. There's no comparison for how the two teams perform on the court, and there are a growing number of fans like me who have season tickets in women's basketball and won't step in the door of a men's game. In fact, I turned down a pair of free tickets to a men's game this year; I just wasn't interested.
I also know firsthand that type of apathy didn't evolve overnight. And a new AD has his job cut out how to reverse it...
Last edited: