Generally, when you see such a laundry list of issues as this one, you also tend to find no cause for suit. These are complaints listing every single violation or anything close to violations in her history - a wholesale flinging of crap against a wall to see what sticks.
If we did have someone under our employ who had their own hot "Firing Jar", sadistically forcing employees to rat out people who did nothing to earn censure - that is most certainly cause for termination because it creates an intolerable, abusive ambiance. Frankly, if such a person exists, what this lady has done was to blow the whistle appropriately on one uncivil, powercrazed POS.
But I;m afraid sexual relations between employees of relatively equal standing- shock of shocks! - is not only one of the most common modes of some great relationships starting at work places - as delicate as that can be - but is hardly fireable, lol."Having an affair" violates no policy known to man, outside of the family if one is married, or when clear of abusive possibilities by virtue of career positions.
The thing with Petrino hiring family is another moot point.........the last hire was the intimate everyday strategic partner of a Heisman Trophy winner - a reasonably efficient track record. Add the numbers of fans who were loudly advocating we rehire Paul Petrino for the :fire" he brings, lol, and the case begins getting confusing.....Everyone in a field where trust is vital hires family, especially football, as is known and illustrated elsewhere in spades, if they are lucky enough to have some. Then there was this, which gives the entire thing even less cred: "The suit also raises concerns about “a coach’s unused University office reserved for his private Foundation.”" Really?? An unused office, lol? Are the closets busy?? I actually once had an affair in a closet at a party myself. Now that I am finally a clean individual, I realize those things are vile and dirty as hell. Good Lord, the unused office is the Devil's Playground.
I'm disappointed in this lady.. She's a whiner with a lawyer. She probably had a case if she were doing a good job at her field. She was swept out with Mark and Julie under the new regime's filter - very unceremoniously and with apparent rancor, humiliatingly - but all this other crap tells me they may have made an excellent decision ridding themselves of her whiny, dissolute ass.