There is a thread mentioning that Malik was spouting off at fans, is that true or are they just making shit up again?
Now we are making some progress in answering the question.His dad needs to STFU and let the coaches decide.
Parents that do things like that have always pissed me off.Now we are making some progress in answering the question.
I said Saturday that if MC didn't get a wake up call, and start being a QUARTERBACK...he never will.
Seems like Dad got it.
The offense, regardless the strength of competition, moved more efficiently than it has this year.
And speaking of strength of competition, UVA is arguably "better" than BC.
And how did that BC competition work out for MC?
Yeah, you and your post really lit a fire under the Cunningham family - lol. As for your other question well - Malik accounted for 250yds and 4 TDS until he left the game with a concussion. Your new hero Domann went 1-8 with an INT and failed to lead UofL back after the defense got repeatedly gashed for big plays So fair to say that the BC loss wasn’t on Malik.I said Saturday that if MC didn't get a wake up call, and start being a QUARTERBACK...he never will.
Seems like Dad got it.
The offense, regardless the strength of competition, moved more efficiently than it has this year.
And speaking of strength of competition, UVA is arguably "better" than BC.
And how did that BC competition work out for MC?
I see.Yeah, you and your post really lit a fire under the Cunningham family - lol. As for your other question well - Malik accounted for 250yds and 4 TDS until he left the game with a concussion. Your new hero Domann went 1-8 with an INT and failed to lead UofL back after the defense got repeatedly gashed for big plays So fair to say that the BC loss wasn’t on Malik.
Way better. We were not mentally prepared to win against BC. We came out going through the motions like we have so many times under Satterfield. When we bring it we're a different team. Why is that so hard for Satterfield to see.And speaking of strength of competition, UVA is arguably "better" than BC.
Look I agree with his passing issues and inability to completely go through progressions but this here is not it... multiple ACC coaches have openly said he’s one of the hardest players in the country to defend and game plan for. They also said they can’t wait for him to leave so they don’t have to plan for him again.There a simple fact that some do not want to admit, Malik is easy to defend because of his inability to read defenses and go beyond the 1st read.
I get it that players want to "hotdog" but athleticism will only take you so far.
Polite coach speak. Of course they are going to say that. Ask the opposing linebackers and DEs if they think he is hard to defend.Look I agree with his passing issues and inability to completely go through progressions but this here is not it... multiple ACC coaches have openly said he’s one of the hardest players in the country to defend and game plan for. They also said they can’t wait for him to leave so they don’t have to plan for him again.
Nope - as usual, you don’t see.I see.
Wins are his and losses are everybody else’s.
Got it.
Actually, you are right.Nope - as usual, you don’t see.
Wins and losses are team things. You tried to crap on Malik individually suggesting that the loss was on him. In every way - statistically, the eye test, etc - that is simply nonsense.
You’re welcome.
Question for all of my fellow posters: Would we be better off with our backup qb and have MC as a runner/receiver? He could actually pass the ball from the rb spot from time to time as a surprise to opposing defenses. In my opinion, MC might make it at the next level as a receiver/runner but not as a qb whereas Domann is a better and more consistent passer. Just some thoughts.Actually, you are right.
When MC is “on” he’s the most exciting DANGEROUS player today.
It’s just frustrating that in his 20th year here (it seems) he has so many brain farts.
I as much as anybody hope things click for him so we can win 4 or 5 of the next 6. We need him “on” in order to do that.
@BPGhost is right.Question for all of my fellow posters: Would we be better off with our backup qb and have MC as a runner/receiver? He could actually pass the ball from the rb spot from time to time as a surprise to opposing defenses. In my opinion, MC might make it at the next level as a receiver/runner but not as a qb whereas Domann is a better and more consistent passer. Just some thoughts.
GO CARDS!!!
OK fine. But how would we know if gocds point is valid or not until it is tried in a game. At this point record wise...what do the Cards have to lose?@BPGhost is right.
MC has had fantastic games and flashes of “special” in his career.
For some reason he seems to forget everything at times
At other times he passes like Tom Brady.
I hope the injured week and the bye week get his head back where it needs to be.
When he is “on” we can compete with anyone and beat a lot of them.
Malik has averaged 250+ yards and 18+ points per game in his career - that’s pretty special for a CFB QB. He had the misfortune of following a generational player in Lamar with a similar skill set that was never going to match up.Malik is one of the most gifted athletes to ever play football at UL; he, nor anyone else will likely measure up to Lamar, but Malik comes about as close as anyone. Malik reminds me a lot of Major Harris when he was guiding WVU so successfully, but went drafted because he was a much better athlete than he was a QB.
Eveyone knowledgeable of offensive football in college, and have paid attention to UL a over the last 3 years, can clearly see that Malik lacks all of the necessary skill set to perform as a winning QB. His struggle reading the defense and moving from one progression to another, as he so often locks into one receiver as soon as the ball is snapped ……something opposing defenses have recognized. Yet, the most overwhelming issue Malik has failed to overcome, is his inability to sustain consistency in the passing game. There have been games, and periods within some games, where Malik exhibited consistent accuracy completing passes …..but it has never been sufficiently consistent, evidenced by so many games where his percentage of completion reached the level it takes to win over the course of the season. Perhaps the most glaring negative has been his inability to execute in the critical 3rd and 4th down situations where it ws the difference between winning and losing.
Do not misinterpret what I am saying here, as Malik is not the only reason we are losing in disappointing fashion, as his ability to run the football has been the only thing that has kept us in so many close losses. I do believe right now, Doman at QB gives this UL team the best opportunity to salvage the season. Our opponents know how to beat UL with Malik at QB ……... they just need to load up the box and focus on containing Malik, as he has not demonstrated that he can beat them throwing the football.