SEC = Pathetic
- Thread starter Point Guard 77
- Start date
Really bad will get one team in tournament and don't say any thing about florida they suck
We will get two maybe three. SEC sucks but not THAT bad to only get one team in.
Even if you assume the SEC gets 3 in guess what that means? It still means the SEC sucks. If the Mildcats played in even a decent conference the last 30 years they would not be anywhere near the win totals of UNC and KU. What a hollow record that is.
Actually, half of those years you might not have even been invited.
you guys are the most delusional aholes on the planet
The topic is related to how many sec men's teams will get invited not women's.
According to logic presented by a few of the posters on this forum we would have been much more prepared for the NCAA-T had we been in a tougher league. By that logic, if we are more prepared in a tougher league we would have more final fours/championships
I'm just trying to see things through yals point of view
yes they are bad,,, going into this last weekend,, the sec as a whole was a combined 1-30 against teams ranked in the RPI top 25..... ky the only win against north Carolina,,, that is pretty bad.
According to ESPN Arkansas will be in and Georgia is among the first four out so maybe 5 teams make it in.
Well, you've reached the saddest fact of them all, then. The talent make-ups and the sheer frigging numbers of AA's on your teams have nearly guaranteed you Final Fours and almost certainly Elite 8's. Even playing in the SEC was at worst practice.
So you've had those talent advantages already, hell, ever since Calipari arrived with his Memphis team. But he hasn't been there 20 years, lol. I doubt seriously if BillyG the Savior would have been to any FF's, lol. Tubby? Who knows what miracles are even still in that massive desk.
You've had at least 4 teams who should have won it all. You can draw your own conclusions, bearing in mind an AAC team beat you - twice - when the chips were down and that Calipari's other national finalist came from CUSA. Those were not classically "strong conferences" - not like the old Big East or ACC. You've won just exactly what you are due.
So you're saying a tougher conference wouldn't better prepare us? Make up yals mind I can't keep up with your double standard logic.
I can agree with this. I hope and actually think it will start trending in right direction as soon as next year. Three or four good teams out of 14 doesn't cut it. I still enjoy watching the games, but they are not near as fun as they were back 20 - 30 years ago.
They can't do anything about the conference being weak, and they schedule tough opponents in their non-conference schedule.
I imagine it's like being in the AAC indefinitely...
I imagine it's like being in the AAC indefinitely...
Similar threads
