Now the committee will have to show whether they have prejudice. Clemson goes down, Washington goes down, Michigan is in a dog fight with an unranked team.
UofL started slow, but came back to demolish a 6-3 team. I think they jump Washington. How does the committee view the ACC? Does Clemson get plastered? Does Michigan get penalized for a close game against an unranked team like we did?
This week will show how their prejudices lay.
IMO Michigan should have already been penalized for only playing their third road game of the season, but it's obvious they don't see it that way.
IMO the committee wants 2 teams from a conference in. TAMU being at 8 is proof proof of that. If not the SEC, they want two B1G teams in.
I have a bad feeling that the committee would prefer a 2 loss B1G team (OSU or Mich) over a 1 loss ACC team.
UofL started slow, but came back to demolish a 6-3 team. I think they jump Washington. How does the committee view the ACC? Does Clemson get plastered? Does Michigan get penalized for a close game against an unranked team like we did?
This week will show how their prejudices lay.
IMO Michigan should have already been penalized for only playing their third road game of the season, but it's obvious they don't see it that way.
IMO the committee wants 2 teams from a conference in. TAMU being at 8 is proof proof of that. If not the SEC, they want two B1G teams in.
I have a bad feeling that the committee would prefer a 2 loss B1G team (OSU or Mich) over a 1 loss ACC team.